An assessment of the skin sensitisation hazard of a group of polyfunctional silicones using a weight of evidence approach.

Discordant results were observed when testing five prototype polyfunctional silicone materials for skin sensitization potential in the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) and in the guinea pig maximization test (GPMT). While all five silicone materials were consistently negative in the GPMT, the testing in the LLNA revealed weak to moderate skin sensitisation potential for four of the five test materials. Neither study quality nor other known chemical factors could explain these findings. Further analysis did not provide sufficient evidence for a link between the LLNA responses and the irritancy of the test substances. Only in the case of one of the test materials, the occurrence of an excessive level of irritation could be linked to the positive LLNA result. Considering all existing information including physico-chemical and structure activity and animal data as well as existing human experience from silicone exposures at the workplace or their use in cosmetic products, the weight of evidence suggests that none of the examined silicone materials represents a significant skin sensitization hazard to humans. The suitability of the LLNA appears questionable for this class of materials. In case of any additional data needs for other or new silicone materials, the skin sensitization testing strategy will require careful evaluation and will need to be set up on a case by case basis.

[1]  U. Tillmann,et al.  A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. , 1997, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[2]  J Hilton,et al.  Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial. , 1996, Toxicology.

[3]  John McFadden,et al.  Identification and classification of skin sensitizers: identifying false positives and false negatives , 2006, Contact dermatitis.

[4]  J Hilton,et al.  The murine local lymph node assay. , 1995, Methods in molecular biology.

[5]  M. Meade A COMBINED MURINE LOCAL LYMPH NODE AND IRRITANCY ASSAY TO PREDICT SENSITIZATION AND IRRITANCY POTENTIAL OF CHEMICALS , 1998 .

[6]  Frank Gerberick,et al.  Nothing is perfect, not even the local lymph node assay: a commentary and the implications for REACH , 2009, Contact dermatitis.

[7]  M. S. Lee,et al.  Comparison of the skin sensitizing potential of unsaturated compounds as assessed by the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) and the guinea pig maximization test (GPMT). , 2008, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[8]  Grace Patlewicz,et al.  Skin sensitization: reaction mechanistic applicability domains for structure-activity relationships. , 2005, Chemical research in toxicology.

[9]  I. Kimber,et al.  Local lymph node assay responses to paraphenylenediamine: intra‐ and inter‐laboratory evaluations , 1999, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[10]  Reinhard Kreiling,et al.  Application of a weight of evidence approach to assessing discordant sensitisation datasets: implications for REACH. , 2009, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[11]  Grace Patlewicz,et al.  Electrophilic chemistry related to skin sensitization. Reaction mechanistic applicability domain classification for a published data set of 106 chemicals tested in the mouse local lymph node assay. , 2007, Chemical research in toxicology.

[12]  David W Roberts,et al.  Determinants of skin sensitisation potential , 2008, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[13]  A. Jürgen,et al.  The local lymph node assay being too sensitive? , 2005, Archives of Toxicology.

[14]  M. Singh,et al.  Assessment of skin irritation and molecular responses in rat skin exposed to nonane, dodecane and tetradecane. , 2004, Toxicology letters.

[15]  I Kimber,et al.  Skin sensitisation, vehicle effects and the local lymph node assay. , 2001, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.