Translational Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling for an Orally Available Novel Inhibitor of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase and c-Ros Oncogene 1

An orally available macrocyclic small molecule, PF06463922 [(10R)-7-amino-12-fluoro-2,10,16-trimethyl-15-oxo-10,15,16,17-tetrahydro-2H-8,4-(metheno)pyrazolo[4,3-h][2,5,11]benzoxadiazacyclotetradecine-3-carbonitrile], is a selective inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and c-Ros oncogene 1 (ROS1). The objectives of the present study were to characterize the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of PF06463922 between its systemic exposures, pharmacodynamic biomarker (target modulation), and pharmacologic response (antitumor efficacy) in athymic mice implanted with H3122 non–small cell lung carcinomas expressing echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK mutation (EML4-ALKL1196M) and with NIH3T3 cells expressing CD74-ROS1. In these nonclinical tumor models, PF06463922 was orally administered to animals with EML4-ALKL1196M and CD74-ROS1 at twice daily doses of 0.3–20 and 0.01–3 mg/kg per dose, respectively. Plasma concentration-time profiles of PF06463922 were adequately described by a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Using the model-simulated plasma concentrations, a pharmacodynamic indirect response model with a modulator sufficiently fit the time courses of target modulation (i.e., ALK phosphorylation) in tumors of EML4-ALKL1196M–driven models with EC50,in vivo of 36 nM free. A drug-disease model based on an indirect response model reasonably fit individual tumor growth curves in both EML4-ALKL1196M– and CD74-ROS1–driven models with the estimated tumor stasis concentrations of 51 and 6.2 nM free, respectively. Thus, the EC60,in vivo (52 nM free) for ALK inhibition roughly corresponded to the tumor stasis concentration in an EML4-ALKL1196M–driven model, suggesting that 60% ALK inhibition would be required for tumor stasis. Accordingly, we proposed that the EC60,in vivo for ALK inhibition corresponding to the tumor stasis could be considered a minimum target efficacious concentration of PF06463922 for cancer patients in a phase I trial.

[1]  F. André,et al.  The genetic complexity of common cancers and the promise of personalized medicine: is there any hope? , 2014, The Journal of pathology.

[2]  Shinji Yamazaki,et al.  Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Biomarker Response and Tumor Growth Inhibition to an Orally Available cMet Kinase Inhibitor in Human Tumor Xenograft Mouse Models , 2008, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[3]  Harvey Wong,et al.  Pharmacodynamics of 2-{4-[(1E)-1-(Hydroxyimino)-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-5-yl]-3-(pyridine-4-yl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl}ethan-1-ol (GDC-0879), a Potent and Selective B-Raf Kinase Inhibitor: Understanding Relationships between Systemic Concentrations, Phosphorylated Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinase 1 Inh , 2009, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[4]  Jeffrey W. Clark,et al.  Activity and safety of crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated results from a phase 1 study. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[5]  W. Colburn Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling: What it is! , 1987, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[6]  Sergei L Timofeevski,et al.  Abstract A277: PF-06463922, a novel ROS1/ALK inhibitor, demonstrates sub-nanomolar potency against oncogenic ROS1 fusions and capable of blocking the resistant ROS1G2032R mutant in preclinical tumor models. , 2013 .

[7]  Paolo Vicini,et al.  Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Crizotinib for Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibition and Antitumor Efficacy in Human Tumor Xenograft Mouse Models , 2012, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[8]  C. Gridelli,et al.  ALK inhibitors in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. , 2014, Cancer treatment reviews.

[9]  B. Solomon,et al.  New Treatment Options for ALK-Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2015, Current Treatment Options in Oncology.

[10]  Steven P Gygi,et al.  Signaling networks assembled by oncogenic EGFR and c-Met , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  N. Reguart,et al.  Acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: a new era begins. , 2014, Cancer treatment reviews.

[12]  Vikram Sinha,et al.  Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and the stages of drug development: Role of modeling and simulation , 2005, The AAPS Journal.

[13]  Johan Gabrielsson,et al.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Data Analysis: Concepts and Applications , 2002 .

[14]  P. Jänne,et al.  EGFR-mutated oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer: current trends and future prospects. , 2012, Cancer treatment reviews.

[15]  Funda Meric-Bernstam,et al.  Building a personalized medicine infrastructure at a major cancer center. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  P. Vrignaud,et al.  Experimental antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics of the camptothecin analog irinotecan (CPT-11) in mice , 1996, Anti-cancer drugs.

[17]  Holly Kimko,et al.  Mathematical modeling of tumor growth and tumor growth inhibition in oncology drug development , 2012, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[18]  Young Lim Choi,et al.  EML4-ALK mutations in lung cancer that confer resistance to ALK inhibitors. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  P. Jänne,et al.  The quest to overcome resistance to EGFR-targeted therapies in cancer , 2013, Nature Medicine.

[20]  H. Aburatani,et al.  Identification of the transforming EML4–ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer , 2007, Nature.

[21]  Harvey Wong,et al.  Pharmacodynamics of 2-{ 4-[ ( 1 E )-1-( Hydroxyimino )-2 , 3-dihydro-1 H-inden-5-yl ]-3-( pyridine-4-yl )-1 H-pyrazol-1-yl } ethan-1-ol ( GDC-0879 ) , a Potent and Selective B-Raf Kinase Inhibitor : Understanding Relationships between Systemic Concentrations , Phosphorylated Mitogen-Activated Protei , 2009 .

[22]  S. Yamazaki Translational Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling from Nonclinical to Clinical Development: A Case Study of Anticancer Drug, Crizotinib , 2013, The AAPS Journal.

[23]  J. Minna,et al.  Targeted Therapies for Lung Cancer: Clinical Experience and Novel Agents , 2011, Cancer journal.

[24]  R. Rosell,et al.  Adaptive resistance to targeted therapies in cancer. , 2013, Translational lung cancer research.

[25]  Laura A. Sullivan,et al.  Global Survey of Phosphotyrosine Signaling Identifies Oncogenic Kinases in Lung Cancer , 2007, Cell.

[26]  Johan Gabrielsson,et al.  Comprar Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Data Analysis: Concepts and Applications, Fourth Edition | Johan Gabrielsson | 9789197651004 | Informa Healthcare , 2007 .

[27]  A. Moreira,et al.  Personalized medicine for non-small-cell lung cancer: implications of recent advances in tissue acquisition for molecular and histologic testing. , 2012, Clinical lung cancer.

[28]  Jeffrey W. Clark,et al.  Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  理 福田,et al.  University of California, San Francisco , 1974, Medical History.

[30]  L. Tanoue,et al.  Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibition in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer , 2012 .

[31]  A. Sandler,et al.  EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Difference in Efficacy and Resistance , 2013, Current Oncology Reports.

[32]  Varun Garg,et al.  Comparison of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses , 1993, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[33]  A. Rossi,et al.  ALK inhibitors: a new targeted therapy in the treatment of advanced NSCLC , 2013, Targeted Oncology.

[34]  Quynh-Thu Le,et al.  Non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical practice guidelines in oncology , 2006 .

[35]  L B Sheiner,et al.  The population approach to pharmacokinetic data analysis: rationale and standard data analysis methods. , 1984, Drug metabolism reviews.

[36]  D. Ettinger,et al.  NCCN: Non-small cell lung cancer. , 2001, Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center.

[37]  Giuseppe De Nicolao,et al.  Biomarker- versus drug-driven tumor growth inhibition models: an equivalence analysis , 2015, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

[38]  W J Jusko,et al.  Precursor-dependent indirect pharmacodynamic response model for tolerance and rebound phenomena. , 1998, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[39]  Tianhong Li,et al.  Genotyping and genomic profiling of non-small-cell lung cancer: implications for current and future therapies. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[40]  Wei Liu,et al.  Discovery of (10R)-7-amino-12-fluoro-2,10,16-trimethyl-15-oxo-10,15,16,17-tetrahydro-2H-8,4-(metheno)pyrazolo[4,3-h][2,5,11]-benzoxadiazacyclotetradecine-3-carbonitrile (PF-06463922), a macrocyclic inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) with preclinical brain expos , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[41]  William Pao,et al.  Prospective Assessment of Discontinuation and Reinitiation of Erlotinib or Gefitinib in Patients with Acquired Resistance to Erlotinib or Gefitinib Followed by the Addition of Everolimus , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[42]  Daniel C Kirouac,et al.  Computational Modeling of ERBB2-Amplified Breast Cancer Identifies Combined ErbB2/3 Blockade as Superior to the Combination of MEK and AKT Inhibitors , 2013, Science Signaling.

[43]  Mats O. Karlsson,et al.  Assessment of Actual Significance Levels for Covariate Effects in NONMEM , 2001, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

[44]  S. Ou Crizotinib: a drug that crystallizes a unique molecular subset of non-small-cell lung cancer , 2012, Expert review of anticancer therapy.

[45]  Huichun Zhu,et al.  Discovery of (10R)-7-Amino-12-Fluoro-2,10,16-Trimethyl-15-Oxo-10,15,16,17-Tetrahydro-2H-8,4-(Metheno)Pyrazolo[4,3-H][2,5,11]Benzoxadiazacyclotetradecine-3-Carbonitrile (Pf-06463922), a Macrocyclic Inhibitor of Alk/Ros1 with Pre-Clinical Brain Exposure and Broad Spectrum Potency Against Alk-Resistant , 2014 .

[46]  J. Weiner Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data analysis , 2013 .

[47]  Hartmut Derendorf,et al.  Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling in Drug Research and Development , 2000, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[48]  B. Johnson,et al.  The impact of genomic changes on treatment of lung cancer. , 2013, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[49]  Paolo Vicini,et al.  Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Biomarker Response and Tumor Growth Inhibition to an Orally Available Heat Shock Protein 90 Inhibitor in a Human Tumor Xenograft Mouse Model , 2011, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[50]  Liquid Biopsies Non-small-cell lung cancer , 2015, Nature Reviews Disease Primers.

[51]  J. Minna,et al.  ALK inhibition for non-small cell lung cancer: from discovery to therapy in record time. , 2010, Cancer cell.

[52]  W J Jusko,et al.  Physiologic indirect response models characterize diverse types of pharmacodynamic effects , 1994, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[53]  Gregory Riely,et al.  Second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancers. , 2013, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[54]  Sandro Santagata,et al.  Chaperones as thermodynamic sensors of drug–target interactions reveal kinase inhibitor specificities in living cells , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.