Nanotechnology innovation system: Understanding hidden dynamics of nanoscience fusion trajectories

Abstract Nanoscience and technology has introduced a new dimension to basic sciences and a range of technologies. Researchers from various scientific disciplines are aggressively getting involved in the relevant research as a parallel way to boost nanoscience competitiveness through academic research, and corporations are directing their R&D activities towards the exploration and exploitation of nanotech opportunities. For years, it has been said that innovation is achieved by breaking through the boundaries of existing technologies. This paper has argued how nanotechnology is driven by scientific research and in what way traditional disciplines are fused into this emerging area. We attempt to provide an empirical analysis of the dynamics of nanoscience fusion trajectories, which is typically a focused area in innovation studies. In this paper, we seek to understand the attributes that are likely to enable scientific disciplines to fuse into nanoscience through a combination of quantitative and qualitative search within nanotechnology systems of innovation (NanoSI). An insight of the similarity and disparity of fusion between Europe and Japan is also provided. Finally, we develop an integrative framework to explore the co-evolutionary nature of nanotech. The paper then tries to derive some implications that would be useful for science and technology policy makers as well as for researchers in traditional scientific disciplines.

[1]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science , 2003 .

[2]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  International strategy for nanotechnology research and development , 2001 .

[3]  Nazrul Islam,et al.  Nanotechnology Innovation System: Strategic Perspective , 2006 .

[4]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues , 2002 .

[5]  F. Kodama,et al.  Analyzing Japanese High Technologies: The Techno-Paradigm Shift , 1991 .

[6]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[7]  Michel Zitt,et al.  Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: An application to nanosciences , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[8]  Helena M. M. Lastres,et al.  Emerging Patterns of Innovation: Sources of Japan's Technological Edge , 1994 .

[9]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Nanoscience and nanotecnology on the balance , 1997, Scientometrics.

[10]  Martin S. Meyer,et al.  Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology:An exploration of nano-science and nano-technology , 2001, Scientometrics.

[11]  S. Hung,et al.  Stimulating new industries from emerging technologies: challenges for the public sector , 2006 .

[12]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[13]  Kumiko Miyazaki,et al.  An integrated network approach to systems of innovation--the case of robotics in Japan , 1999 .

[14]  Richard Hull,et al.  The Techno-Economic: Perspectives for Analysis and Intervention , 1999 .

[15]  R. Nelson National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis , 1993 .

[16]  C. Edquist Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[17]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Publications and patents in nanotechnology , 2003, Scientometrics.

[18]  Jyoti S. A. Bhat,et al.  Concerns of new technology based industries: The case of nanotechnology. , 2005 .

[19]  Wolfgang Luther International Strategy and Foresight Report on Nanoscience and Nanotechnology , 2006 .

[20]  F. Malerba Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[21]  A. Porter,et al.  Nanopatenting patterns in relation to product life cycle , 2007 .

[22]  P. Zhou,et al.  The Emergence of China as a Leading Nation in Science. Research Policy, 35(1), 2006, 83-104. , 2006, 0911.3421.

[23]  N. Islam,et al.  Nanotechnology systems of innovation - An analysis of industry and academia research activities , 2007 .

[24]  Jarunee Wonglimpiyarat,et al.  The nano-revolution of Schumpeter's Kondratieff cycle , 2005 .

[25]  Steven T. Walsh,et al.  AN INTRODUCTION TO NANOTECHNOLOGY POLICY: OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS FOR EMERGING AND ESTABLISHED ECONOMIES , 2007 .

[26]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  International strategy for Nanotechnology Research , 2001 .

[27]  Jurgen Schulte Nanotechnology: Global Strategies, Industry Trends and Applications , 2010 .

[28]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[29]  J. R. Wolfson Social and Ethical Issues in Nanotechnology: Lessons from Biotechnology and Other High Technologies , 2003 .

[30]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[31]  Ronald N. Kostoff,et al.  Global nanotechnology research literature overview , 2007 .

[32]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance , 2003 .

[33]  Christine M. Shea Future management research directions in nanotechnology: A case study , 2005 .