Automating drug discovery

Small-molecule drug discovery can be viewed as a challenging multidimensional problem in which various characteristics of compounds — including efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety — need to be optimized in parallel to provide drug candidates. Recent advances in areas such as microfluidics-assisted chemical synthesis and biological testing, as well as artificial intelligence systems that improve a design hypothesis through feedback analysis, are now providing a basis for the introduction of greater automation into aspects of this process. This could potentially accelerate time frames for compound discovery and optimization and enable more effective searches of chemical space. However, such approaches also raise considerable conceptual, technical and organizational challenges, as well as scepticism about the current hype around them. This article aims to identify the approaches and technologies that could be implemented robustly by medicinal chemists in the near future and to critically analyse the opportunities and challenges for their more widespread application.

[1]  Andrew D Griffiths,et al.  Synthesis of new hydrophilic rhodamine based enzymatic substrates compatible with droplet-based microfluidic assays. , 2017, Chemical communications.

[2]  G. Roth,et al.  Preparative microfluidic electrosynthesis of drug metabolites. , 2013, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.

[3]  S. Satyanarayanajois,et al.  Medicinal chemistry for 2020. , 2011, Future medicinal chemistry.

[4]  Yair Glick,et al.  DNA Bipedal Motor Achieves a Large Number of Steps Due to Operation Using Microfluidics-Based Interface. , 2017, ACS nano.

[5]  Joost N. H. Reek,et al.  Dynamic Combinatorial Chemistry in Chemical Catalysis , 2013 .

[6]  David R. Spring,et al.  Diversity-Oriented Synthesis: Producing Chemical Tools for Dissecting Biology , 2012 .

[7]  Babur Hadimioglu,et al.  Moving Liquids with Sound , 2016, Journal of laboratory automation.

[8]  Stephen D. Roughley,et al.  The Medicinal Chemist′s Toolbox: An Analysis of Reactions Used in the Pursuit of Drug Candidates , 2011 .

[9]  Raluca M. Fratila,et al.  Small-volume nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. , 2011, Annual review of analytical chemistry.

[10]  Steven V Ley,et al.  The use of a continuous flow-reactor employing a mixed hydrogen-liquid flow stream for the efficient reduction of imines to amines. , 2005, Chemical communications.

[11]  Vijay S. Pande,et al.  Low Data Drug Discovery with One-Shot Learning , 2016, ACS central science.

[12]  G. Schneider,et al.  Active learning for computational chemogenomics. , 2017, Future medicinal chemistry.

[13]  Paulina Kanigowska,et al.  Smart DNA Fabrication Using Sound Waves , 2016, Journal of laboratory automation.

[14]  Roger D. Kamm,et al.  Modeling the Blood-Brain Barrier in a 3D triple co-culture microfluidic system , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[15]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  Neural networks are useful tools for drug design , 2000, Neural Networks.

[16]  Alexander G. Godfrey,et al.  A remote-controlled adaptive medchem lab: an innovative approach to enable drug discovery in the 21st Century. , 2013, Drug discovery today.

[17]  A V Eliseev,et al.  Dynamic combinatorial chemistry: evolutionary formation and screening of molecular libraries. , 1999, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.

[18]  David A. Patterson,et al.  In-datacenter performance analysis of a tensor processing unit , 2017, 2017 ACM/IEEE 44th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA).

[19]  K. Baumann,et al.  Chemoinformatic Classification Methods and their Applicability Domain , 2016, Molecular informatics.

[20]  Sang-Hoon Lee,et al.  Applications of micromixing technology. , 2010, The Analyst.

[21]  Gisbert Schneider De novo Molecular Design: Schneider/De novo Molecular Design , 2013 .

[22]  Jing Li,et al.  Representing high throughput expression profiles via perturbation barcodes reveals compound targets , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[23]  Igor V Tetko,et al.  A renaissance of neural networks in drug discovery , 2016, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[24]  A. Theberge,et al.  Microdroplets in microfluidics: an evolving platform for discoveries in chemistry and biology. , 2010, Angewandte Chemie.

[25]  Jordi Mestres,et al.  Distant polypharmacology among MLP chemical probes. , 2015, ACS chemical biology.

[26]  C. Oliver Kappe,et al.  Process Intensified Flow Synthesis of 1H-4-Substituted Imidazoles: Toward the Continuous Production of Daclatasvir , 2015 .

[27]  J Vidugiriene,et al.  Miniaturized GPCR signaling studies in 1536-well format. , 2008, Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT.

[28]  Kimito Funatsu,et al.  Exhaustive Structure Generation for Inverse‐QSPR/QSAR , 2010, Molecular informatics.

[29]  G. Schneider,et al.  Review : Macromolecular target prediction by self-organizing feature maps , 2016 .

[30]  Vladimir Sykora,et al.  Automation of decision making in drug design. , 2013, Drug discovery today. Technologies.

[31]  Mickael Montembault,et al.  Leveraging the Advantages Offered by Microfluidics to Enhance the Drug Discovery Process , 2005 .

[32]  Kathrin Heikamp,et al.  Do medicinal chemists learn from activity cliffs? A systematic evaluation of cliff progression in evolving compound data sets. , 2013, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[33]  A V Eliseev,et al.  Dynamic Combinatorial Chemistry , 2001, Science.

[34]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Learning to Predict Chemical Reactions , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[35]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  Steering target selectivity and potency by fragment-based de novo drug design. , 2013, Angewandte Chemie.

[36]  Nathan Brown,et al.  Multi-objective optimization methods in drug design. , 2013, Drug discovery today. Technologies.

[37]  Richard C. Wilson,et al.  Generative Models for Chemical Structures , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[38]  Dave Allen Where will we get the next generation of medicinal chemists? , 2016, Drug discovery today.

[39]  A. Vandenbroucke,et al.  Technologies That Enable Accurate and Precise Nano- to Milliliter-Scale Liquid Dispensing of Aqueous Reagents Using Acoustic Droplet Ejection , 2016, Journal of laboratory automation.

[40]  Meir Glick,et al.  Extending 'predict first' to the design-make-test cycle in small-molecule drug discovery. , 2017, Future medicinal chemistry.

[41]  Oliver J. Dressler,et al.  Droplet-Based Microfluidics , 2014, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[42]  Ross D. King,et al.  Representation of probabilistic scientific knowledge , 2013, J. Biomed. Semant..

[43]  F. Lombardo,et al.  Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings , 1997 .

[44]  G Schneider,et al.  Artificial neural networks for computer-based molecular design. , 1998, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[45]  Klavs F Jensen,et al.  An integrated microreactor system for self-optimization of a Heck reaction: from micro- to mesoscale flow systems. , 2010, Angewandte Chemie.

[46]  Remo Hochstrasser,et al.  Seamless integration of dose-response screening and flow chemistry: efficient generation of structure-activity relationship data of β-secretase (BACE1) inhibitors. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[47]  A. Gambin,et al.  Predicting the outcomes of organic reactions via machine learning: are current descriptors sufficient? , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[48]  Jun-ichi Yoshida,et al.  Flash synthesis of TAC-101 and its analogues from 1,3,5-tribromobenzene using integrated flow microreactor systems , 2011 .

[49]  Carsten Strohmann,et al.  Total synthesis and absolute configuration of the guaiane sesquiterpene englerin A. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[50]  S. Quake,et al.  Microfluidics: Fluid physics at the nanoliter scale , 2005 .

[51]  Ulrike von Luxburg,et al.  Feasibility of Active Machine Learning for Multiclass Compound Classification , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[52]  Peter Friess,et al.  Internet of Things: Converging Technologies for Smart Environments and Integrated Ecosystems , 2013 .

[53]  S. M. M. R. Al-Arif,et al.  Deep learning for single-molecule science , 2017, Nanotechnology.

[54]  Jeffrey Y. Pan,et al.  An Integrated Synthesis-Purification System to Accelerate the Generation of Compounds in Pharmaceutical Discovery , 2011 .

[55]  Andrew J. deMello,et al.  Synthesis of Cesium Lead Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals in a Droplet-Based Microfluidic Platform: Fast Parametric Space Mapping. , 2016, Nano letters.

[56]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  No Electron Left Behind: A Rule-Based Expert System To Predict Chemical Reactions and Reaction Mechanisms , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[57]  Bram van Ginneken,et al.  A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis , 2017, Medical Image Anal..

[58]  Hayato Yoshida,et al.  Continuous-flow synthesis of vitamin D3. , 2010, Chemical communications.

[59]  P. H. Seeberger,et al.  New Avenues to Efficient Chemical Synthesis , 2007 .

[60]  R. M. Francis,et al.  No Denying It: Medicinal Chemistry Training Is in Big Trouble. , 2016 .

[61]  Petra Schneider,et al.  From Complex Natural Products to Simple Synthetic Mimetics by Computational De Novo Design. , 2016, Angewandte Chemie.

[62]  Knut Eis,et al.  Automated medicinal chemistry. , 2006, Drug discovery today.

[63]  P S Dittrich,et al.  Implementing enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays on a microfluidic chip to quantify intracellular molecules in single cells. , 2013, Analytical chemistry.

[64]  Ajay,et al.  Recognizing molecules with drug-like properties. , 1999, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[65]  Igor I. Baskin,et al.  Stargate GTM: Bridging Descriptor and Activity Spaces , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[66]  Martin D. Burke,et al.  Synthesis of many different types of organic small molecules using one automated process , 2015, Science.

[67]  Antoine Cully,et al.  Robots that can adapt like animals , 2014, Nature.

[68]  Manju Bhaskar,et al.  An overview on Combinatorial Chemistry , 2012 .

[69]  Michael F Rafferty,et al.  No Denying It: Medicinal Chemistry Training Is in Big Trouble. , 2016, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[70]  K. Lam,et al.  Combinatorial chemistry in drug discovery. , 2017, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[71]  Chang Lu,et al.  A microfluidic device for epigenomic profiling using 100 cells , 2015, Nature Methods.

[72]  Petra Schneider,et al.  Privileged Structures Revisited , 2017, Angewandte Chemie.

[73]  Ajay,et al.  Can we learn to distinguish between "drug-like" and "nondrug-like" molecules? , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[74]  Antonio del Sol Mesa Big-data-driven stem cell science and tissue engineering: vision and unique opportunities , 2017 .

[75]  Qian Zhu,et al.  Semantic inference using chemogenomics data for drug discovery , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[76]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[77]  Daniel T. Chiu,et al.  Chemistry and biology in femtoliter and picoliter volume droplets. , 2009, Accounts of chemical research.

[78]  Sean Ekins The Next Era: Deep Learning in Pharmaceutical Research , 2016, Pharmaceutical Research.

[79]  Regina Barzilay,et al.  Prediction of Organic Reaction Outcomes Using Machine Learning , 2017, ACS central science.

[80]  Bradley J. Erickson,et al.  Toolkits and Libraries for Deep Learning , 2017, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[81]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  Identification of Hits and Lead Structure Candidates with Limited Resources by Adaptive Optimization , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[82]  Q. Fang,et al.  Direct Surface and Droplet Microsampling for Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry Analysis with an Integrated Dual-Probe Microfluidic Chip. , 2017, Analytical Chemistry.

[83]  Christian Kramer,et al.  Strong Nonadditivity as a Key Structure–Activity Relationship Feature: Distinguishing Structural Changes from Assay Artifacts , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[84]  B. Grzybowski,et al.  Parallel optimization of synthetic pathways within the network of organic chemistry. , 2012, Angewandte Chemie.

[85]  Aleksandra Baranczak,et al.  Integrated Platform for Expedited Synthesis-Purification-Testing of Small Molecule Libraries. , 2017, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.

[86]  Alexander K. Price,et al.  An Integrated Microfluidic Processor for DNA-Encoded Combinatorial Library Functional Screening , 2017, ACS combinatorial science.

[87]  Abhinav Vishnu,et al.  Chemception: A Deep Neural Network with Minimal Chemistry Knowledge Matches the Performance of Expert-developed QSAR/QSPR Models , 2017, ArXiv.

[88]  Andy Koswara,et al.  Reaction screening and optimization of continuous-flow atropine synthesis by preparative electrospray mass spectrometry. , 2017, The Analyst.

[89]  Johann Gasteiger,et al.  Computer‐Assisted Planning of Organic Syntheses: The Second Generation of Programs , 1996 .

[90]  Paul A. Wender,et al.  Function through Synthesis-Informed Design , 2015, Accounts of chemical research.

[91]  B. Munos Lessons from 60 years of pharmaceutical innovation , 2009, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[92]  Dieter Lang,et al.  Predicting drug metabolism: experiment and/or computation? , 2015, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[93]  Petra S Dittrich,et al.  Advances in microfluidics for drug discovery , 2010, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[94]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  A Computational Method for Unveiling the Target Promiscuity of Pharmacologically Active Compounds. , 2017, Angewandte Chemie.

[95]  Roland Zengerle,et al.  Microfluidic platforms for lab-on-a-chip applications. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[96]  Lyn H. Jones,et al.  Applications of chemogenomic library screening in drug discovery , 2017, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[97]  A. deMello,et al.  Intelligent routes to the controlled synthesis of nanoparticles. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[98]  Sergey Plis,et al.  Deep Learning Applications for Predicting Pharmacological Properties of Drugs and Drug Repurposing Using Transcriptomic Data. , 2016, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[99]  R. B. Merrifield Solid phase peptide synthesis. I. the synthesis of a tetrapeptide , 1963 .

[100]  Joshua Lederberg,et al.  DENDRAL: A Case Study of the First Expert System for Scientific Hypothesis Formation , 1993, Artif. Intell..

[101]  Milon Mondal,et al.  Dynamic combinatorial chemistry: a tool to facilitate the identification of inhibitors for protein targets. , 2015, Chemical Society reviews.

[102]  Mark Peplow,et al.  Organic synthesis: The robo-chemist , 2014, Nature.

[103]  Steve Edmondson,et al.  3D printed fluidics with embedded analytic functionality for automated reaction optimisation , 2017, Beilstein journal of organic chemistry.

[104]  P. Leeson,et al.  The influence of drug-like concepts on decision-making in medicinal chemistry , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[105]  Ryoji Kurita,et al.  Microfluidic platforms for DNA methylation analysis. , 2016, Lab on a chip.

[106]  Petra Schneider,et al.  Combinatorial chemistry by ant colony optimization. , 2014, Future medicinal chemistry.

[107]  S Y F Wong-Hawkes,et al.  Microreactors as new tools for drug discovery and development. , 2006, Ernst Schering Foundation symposium proceedings.

[108]  David R Spring,et al.  Diversity-oriented synthesis: producing chemical tools for dissecting biology. , 2012, Chemical Society reviews.

[109]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  Artificial neural networks and simulated molecular evolution are potential tools for sequence-oriented protein design , 1994, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[110]  G. Church,et al.  Large-scale de novo DNA synthesis: technologies and applications , 2014, Nature Methods.

[111]  Yoshihiro Yamanishi,et al.  Benchmarking a Wide Range of Chemical Descriptors for Drug‐Target Interaction Prediction Using a Chemogenomic Approach , 2014, Molecular informatics.

[112]  K. James,et al.  Rapid access to compound libraries through flow technology: fully automated synthesis of a 3-aminoindolizine library via orthogonal diversification. , 2012, ACS combinatorial science.

[113]  P. Seth,et al.  The Medicinal Chemistry of Therapeutic Oligonucleotides. , 2016, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[114]  Bruno Botta,et al.  The Pictet-Spengler Reaction Still on Stage. , 2016, Current pharmaceutical design.

[115]  A. deMello,et al.  3D Droplet Microfluidic Systems for High-Throughput Biological Experimentation. , 2015, Analytical chemistry.

[116]  James E. J. Mills,et al.  Enhanced HTS Hit Selection via a Local Hit Rate Analysis , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[117]  D. Baker,et al.  Emergence of a catalytic tetrad during evolution of a highly active artificial aldolase , 2016, Nature Chemistry.

[118]  Michael Shevlin,et al.  Practical High-Throughput Experimentation for Chemists , 2017, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.

[119]  Cícero Nogueira dos Santos,et al.  Boosting Docking-Based Virtual Screening with Deep Learning , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[120]  Satoshi Ichikawa,et al.  Function-Oriented Synthesis: How to Design Simplified Analogues of Antibacterial Nucleoside Natural Products? , 2016, Chemical record.

[121]  M. Maier,et al.  Design and synthesis of analogues of natural products. , 2015, Organic & biomolecular chemistry.

[122]  Hyeon-Eui Kim,et al.  Deep mining heterogeneous networks of biomedical linked data to predict novel drug‐target associations , 2017, Bioinform..

[123]  Luca Banfi,et al.  Molecular Diversity and Combinatorial Chemistry , 2006, Molecular Diversity.

[124]  Davide Castelvecchi,et al.  Can we open the black box of AI? , 2016, Nature.

[125]  Frank Glorius,et al.  Contemporary screening approaches to reaction discovery and development. , 2014, Nature chemistry.

[126]  Lars Carlsson,et al.  ExCAPE-DB: an integrated large scale dataset facilitating Big Data analysis in chemogenomics , 2017, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[127]  Elizabeth Farrant,et al.  Rapid discovery of a novel series of Abl kinase inhibitors by application of an integrated microfluidic synthesis and screening platform. , 2013, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[128]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Distilling Free-Form Natural Laws from Experimental Data , 2009, Science.

[129]  David A Winkler,et al.  Performance of Deep and Shallow Neural Networks, the Universal Approximation Theorem, Activity Cliffs, and QSAR , 2017, Molecular informatics.

[130]  J. Zupan,et al.  Neural networks: A new method for solving chemical problems or just a passing phase? , 1991 .

[131]  Duncan Guthrie,et al.  Continuous Flow-Processing of Organometallic Reagents Using an Advanced Peristaltic Pumping System and the Telescoped Flow Synthesis of (E/Z)-Tamoxifen , 2013 .

[132]  Petra Schneider,et al.  Accessing new chemical entities through microfluidic systems. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[133]  Jürgen Popp,et al.  Making a big thing of a small cell--recent advances in single cell analysis. , 2014, The Analyst.

[134]  Abhinav Vishnu,et al.  Deep learning for computational chemistry , 2017, J. Comput. Chem..

[135]  Kimito Funatsu,et al.  Structure Modification toward Applicability Domain of a QSAR/QSPR Model Considering Activity/Property , 2017, Molecular informatics.

[136]  H. Kubinyi,et al.  A scoring scheme for discriminating between drugs and nondrugs. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[137]  Zhi Zhu,et al.  Hydrogel Droplet Microfluidics for High-Throughput Single Molecule/Cell Analysis. , 2017, Accounts of chemical research.

[138]  G. V. Paolini,et al.  Quantifying the chemical beauty of drugs. , 2012, Nature chemistry.

[139]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction and mapping of compound libraries for drug discovery. , 2012, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[140]  A. Gautam,et al.  The changing model of big pharma: impact of key trends. , 2016, Drug discovery today.

[141]  Charles W. Hutchins,et al.  Current status and future prospects for enabling chemistry technology in the drug discovery process , 2016, F1000Research.

[142]  Steven V Ley,et al.  Accelerating spirocyclic polyketide synthesis using flow chemistry. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[143]  Y. S. Zhang,et al.  Cancer-on-a-chip systems at the frontier of nanomedicine. , 2017, Drug discovery today.

[144]  Helen Sneddon,et al.  Embedding sustainable practices into pharmaceutical R&D: what are the challenges? , 2014, Future medicinal chemistry.

[145]  Andreas Verras,et al.  Is Multitask Deep Learning Practical for Pharma? , 2017, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[146]  Heike Schönherr,et al.  Profound methyl effects in drug discovery and a call for new C-H methylation reactions. , 2013, Angewandte Chemie.

[147]  Nicholas D. P. Cosford,et al.  An integrated chemical biology approach reveals the mechanism of action of HIV replication inhibitors. , 2017, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[148]  Kevin E Healy,et al.  WAT-on-a-chip: a physiologically relevant microfluidic system incorporating white adipose tissue. , 2017, Lab on a chip.

[149]  Angelo S. Mao,et al.  3D Printed Microtransporters: Compound Micromachines for Spatiotemporally Controlled Delivery of Therapeutic Agents , 2015, Advanced materials.

[150]  Igor V. Tetko,et al.  BIGCHEM: Challenges and Opportunities for Big Data Analysis in Chemistry , 2016, Molecular informatics.

[151]  G. Schneider,et al.  Peptide design by artificial neural networks and computer-based evolutionary search. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[152]  Adam Nelson,et al.  Embarking on a Chemical Space Odyssey. , 2017, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[153]  Paul D Leeson,et al.  Molecular inflation, attrition and the rule of five. , 2016, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[154]  Charlotte Truchet,et al.  Optimizing the Heck–Matsuda Reaction in Flow with a Constraint-Adapted Direct Search Algorithm , 2016 .

[155]  Ryan L. Hartman,et al.  Deciding Whether to Go with the Flow: Evaluating the Merits of Flow Reactors for Synthesis , 2011 .

[156]  P Schneider,et al.  Spotting and designing promiscuous ligands for drug discovery. , 2016, Chemical communications.

[157]  Iskander Yusof,et al.  Considering the impact drug-like properties have on the chance of success. , 2013, Drug discovery today.

[158]  Lawrence G. Hamann,et al.  Accessing Drug Metabolites via Transition‐Metal Catalyzed C—H Oxidation: The Liver as Synthetic Inspiration , 2016 .

[159]  Steven V Ley,et al.  Microwave reactions under continuous flow conditions. , 2007, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[160]  Klavs F Jensen,et al.  Feedback in Flow for Accelerated Reaction Development. , 2016, Accounts of chemical research.

[161]  Stephen L. Crooks,et al.  Overview of Combinatorial Chemistry , 2000, Current protocols in pharmacology.

[162]  Petra Schneider,et al.  Generative Recurrent Networks for De Novo Drug Design , 2017, Molecular informatics.

[163]  D. H. Randle,et al.  Drug Discovery Goes Three-Dimensional: Goodbye to Flat High-Throughput Screening? , 2015, Assay and drug development technologies.

[164]  Alex Zhavoronkov,et al.  Applications of Deep Learning in Biomedicine. , 2016, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[165]  Tim Chapman Lab automation and robotics: Automation on the move , 2003, Nature.

[166]  Bradford A Pindzola,et al.  Microstructured reactors as tools for the intensification of pharmaceutical reactions and processes. , 2009, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[167]  Jun-ichi Yoshida,et al.  Flash chemistry: fast chemical synthesis by using microreactors. , 2008, Chemistry.

[168]  Hamza Landari,et al.  Towards a Multifunctional Electrochemical Sensing and Niosome Generation Lab-on-Chip Platform Based on a Plug-and-Play Concept , 2016, Sensors.

[169]  Marco Schorlemmer,et al.  P2P proteomics -- data sharing for enhanced protein identification , 2012, Automated experimentation.

[170]  A. Manz,et al.  Lab-on-a-chip: microfluidics in drug discovery , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[171]  P Schneider,et al.  Multi-objective active machine learning rapidly improves structure–activity models and reveals new protein–protein interaction inhibitors† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Details about computational comparisons and all screening results. See DOI: 10.1039/c5sc04272k , 2016, Chemical science.

[172]  Chris Marshall,et al.  Starting material oriented retrosynthetic analysis in the LHASA program. 3. Heuristic estimation of synthetic proximity , 1992, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[173]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  De novo Drug Design – Ye olde Scoring Problem Revisited , 2017, Molecular informatics.

[174]  Sung Jin Cho,et al.  ADAAPT: Amgen's data access, analysis, and prediction tools , 2006, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[175]  G. Schneider,et al.  Enabling future drug discovery by de novo design , 2011 .

[176]  Christoph Adami Artificial intelligence: Robots with instincts , 2015, Nature.

[177]  Orr Ravitz,et al.  Data-driven computer aided synthesis design. , 2013, Drug discovery today. Technologies.

[178]  Q. Fang,et al.  Microfluidics for cell-based high throughput screening platforms - A review. , 2016, Analytica chimica acta.

[179]  Ji-Bo Wang,et al.  The Proximal Lilly Collection: Mapping, Exploring and Exploiting Feasible Chemical Space , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[180]  Martin D. Burke,et al.  From Synthesis to Function via Iterative Assembly of N‐Methyliminodiacetic Acid Boronate Building Blocks , 2015 .

[181]  O. A. Burmistrova,et al.  Development of a Specific Substrate—Inhibitor Panel (Liver-on-a-Chip) for Evaluation of Cytochrome P450 Activity , 2016, Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[182]  Lei Xie,et al.  Harnessing Big Data for Systems Pharmacology , 2016, bioRxiv.

[183]  Jose M. Palomo,et al.  Solid-phase peptide synthesis: an overview focused on the preparation of biologically relevant peptides , 2014 .

[184]  E. Corey General methods for the construction of complex molecules , 1967 .

[185]  Katharine Sanderson March of the synthesis machines , 2015, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[186]  Emile M. Bellott,et al.  Combinatorial Chemistry in the Drug Discovery Process , 1997 .

[187]  Klavs F Jensen,et al.  "Batch" kinetics in flow: online IR analysis and continuous control. , 2013, Angewandte Chemie.

[188]  Jonas Boström,et al.  Analysis of Past and Present Synthetic Methodologies on Medicinal Chemistry: Where Have All the New Reactions Gone? , 2016, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[189]  Herbert Waldmann,et al.  Principles, implementation, and application of biology-oriented synthesis (BIOS) , 2010, Biological chemistry.

[190]  Peter H. Seeberger,et al.  Synthesis and medical applications of oligosaccharides , 2007, Nature.

[191]  Rohit Rana,et al.  An eco-compatible strategy for the diversity-oriented synthesis of macrocycles exploiting carbohydrate-derived building blocks , 2017, Beilstein journal of organic chemistry.

[192]  G. Schneider,et al.  Combining on-chip synthesis of a focused combinatorial library with computational target prediction reveals imidazopyridine GPCR ligands. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[193]  Maria F. Sassano,et al.  Automated design of ligands to polypharmacological profiles , 2012, Nature.

[194]  Richard J Ingham,et al.  Organic synthesis: march of the machines. , 2015, Angewandte Chemie.

[195]  Martin Stahl,et al.  Rationalizing Tight Ligand Binding through Cooperative Interaction Networks , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[196]  Wyeth W. Wasserman,et al.  Deep Feature Selection: Theory and Application to Identify Enhancers and Promoters , 2015, RECOMB.

[197]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  Multidimensional de novo design reveals 5-HT2B receptor-selective ligands. , 2015, Angewandte Chemie.

[198]  Steven V. Ley,et al.  Flow Chemistry: Intelligent Processing of Gas-Liquid Transformations Using a Tube-in-Tube Reactor , 2015 .

[199]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Target-oriented and diversity-oriented organic synthesis in drug discovery. , 2000, Science.

[200]  Gisbert Schneider De novo Molecular Design , 2013 .

[201]  Steven V Ley,et al.  A flow-based synthesis of imatinib: the API of Gleevec. , 2010, Chemical communications.

[202]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  Computer-based de novo design of drug-like molecules , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[203]  Igor V Tetko,et al.  Does 'Big Data' exist in medicinal chemistry, and if so, how can it be harnessed? , 2016, Future medicinal chemistry.

[204]  João Rodrigues,et al.  Why and how have drug discovery strategies in pharma changed? What are the new mindsets? , 2016, Drug discovery today.

[205]  S. Y. Wong,et al.  On-demand continuous-flow production of pharmaceuticals in a compact, reconfigurable system , 2016, Science.

[206]  Anna Goldenberg,et al.  TensorFlow: Biology's Gateway to Deep Learning? , 2016, Cell systems.

[207]  Glenn P Carroll,et al.  Measuring the effectiveness and impact of an open innovation platform. , 2017, Drug discovery today.

[208]  Brian H Warrington,et al.  Automated flow-through synthesis of heterocyclic thioethers. , 2004, Journal of combinatorial chemistry.

[209]  Lu Zhang,et al.  From machine learning to deep learning: progress in machine intelligence for rational drug discovery. , 2017, Drug discovery today.

[210]  Jun-ichi Yoshida,et al.  Flash chemistry: flow chemistry that cannot be done in batch. , 2013, Chemical communications.

[211]  Brian H Warrington,et al.  Synthesis of a three-member array of cycloadducts in a glass microchip under pressure driven flow. , 2002, Lab on a chip.

[212]  J. Scannell,et al.  Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency , 2012, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[213]  Petra Schneider,et al.  De Novo Design at the Edge of Chaos. , 2016, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[214]  Ross D King,et al.  Intelligent software for laboratory automation. , 2004, Trends in biotechnology.

[215]  Steven V Ley,et al.  Flow chemistry syntheses of natural products. , 2013, Chemical Society reviews.

[216]  R. J. Beulig,et al.  A droplet-chip/mass spectrometry approach to study organic synthesis at nanoliter scale. , 2017, Lab on a chip.

[217]  Junbo Wang,et al.  Development of Droplet Microfluidics Enabling High-Throughput Single-Cell Analysis , 2016, Molecules.

[218]  A. Long,et al.  Parallel Chemistry in the 21st Century , 2012, Current protocols in pharmacology.

[219]  Mitsutoshi Nakajima,et al.  Recent lab‐on‐chip developments for novel drug discovery , 2017, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.

[220]  Koushik Mondal Design Issues of Big Data Parallelisms , 2016 .

[221]  Petra Schneider,et al.  Identifying the macromolecular targets of de novo-designed chemical entities through self-organizing map consensus , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[222]  Lawrence B. Holder,et al.  Machine learning for epigenetics and future medical applications , 2017, Epigenetics.

[223]  Elizabeth Farrant,et al.  Integrated Synthesis and Testing of Substituted Xanthine Based DPP4 Inhibitors: Application to Drug Discovery. , 2013, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.

[224]  Piotr Dittwald,et al.  Computer-Assisted Synthetic Planning: The End of the Beginning , 2016 .

[225]  Paul A Wender,et al.  Function-oriented synthesis, step economy, and drug design. , 2008, Accounts of chemical research.

[226]  Anthony P. F. Cook,et al.  Computer‐aided synthesis design: 40 years on , 2012 .

[227]  D. Chiu,et al.  Selective encapsulation of single cells and subcellular organelles into picoliter- and femtoliter-volume droplets. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[228]  Amine Miled,et al.  Electrochemical imaging for microfluidics: a full-system approach. , 2016, Lab on a chip.

[229]  Wolfgang Guba,et al.  Neighborhood-preserving visualization of adaptive structure-activity landscapes: application to drug discovery. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[230]  Jeremy L. Steinbacher,et al.  Simplified Mesofluidic Systems for the Formation of Micron to Millimeter Droplets and the Synthesis of Materials , 2012, Journal of Flow Chemistry.

[231]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  Flashback Forward: Reaction-Driven de novo Design of Bioactive Compounds , 2014 .

[232]  Johann Gasteiger Physicochemical effects in the representation of molecular structures for drug designing. , 2003, Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry.

[233]  Hiromasa Kaneko,et al.  Inverse QSPR/QSAR Analysis for Chemical Structure Generation (from y to x) , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[234]  Yanju Wang,et al.  An integrated microfluidic device for large-scale in situ click chemistry screening. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[235]  Eduardo Garcia-Egido,et al.  Synthesis and analysis of combinatorial libraries performed in an automated micro reactor system. , 2003, Lab on a chip.

[236]  Petra Schneider,et al.  Multi-objective molecular de novo design by adaptive fragment prioritization. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[237]  David Ryan Koes,et al.  Protein-Ligand Scoring with Convolutional Neural Networks , 2016, Journal of chemical information and modeling.

[238]  Shuigeng Zhou,et al.  Boosting compound-protein interaction prediction by deep learning , 2015, BIBM.

[239]  T. LaPorte,et al.  Continuous processes for the production of pharmaceutical intermediates and active pharmaceutical ingredients. , 2007, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[240]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  Flashback Forward: Reaction-Driven De Novo Design of Bioactive Compounds , 2013 .

[241]  A. Bogdan,et al.  Enabling Chemistry Technologies and Parallel Synthesis-Accelerators of Drug Discovery Programmes. , 2017, Progress in medicinal chemistry.

[242]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  Active-learning strategies in computer-assisted drug discovery. , 2015, Drug discovery today.

[243]  D. Huh,et al.  Organs-on-chips at the frontiers of drug discovery , 2015, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[244]  Anthony Atala,et al.  Organoid-on-a-chip and body-on-a-chip systems for drug screening and disease modeling. , 2016, Drug discovery today.

[245]  Stefan Wetzel,et al.  Biology-oriented synthesis. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[246]  Maria Liakata,et al.  Towards Robot Scientists for autonomous scientific discovery , 2010, Automated experimentation.

[247]  David Li,et al.  Deep Learning in Drug Discovery and Medicine; Scratching the Surface , 2018, Molecules.

[248]  Steven V Ley,et al.  Flow chemistry: intelligent processing of gas-liquid transformations using a tube-in-tube reactor. , 2015, Accounts of chemical research.

[249]  Kento Ishida,et al.  Total Synthesis of (±)-Englerin A Using An Intermolecular [3+2] Cycloaddition Reaction of Platinum-Containing Carbonyl Ylide. , 2016, Chemistry, an Asian journal.

[250]  A. Abate,et al.  Ultrahigh-throughput screening in drop-based microfluidics for directed evolution , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[251]  Ken E. Whelan,et al.  The Automation of Science , 2009, Science.

[252]  Petra Schneider,et al.  De Novo Fragment Design for Drug Discovery and Chemical Biology. , 2015, Angewandte Chemie.

[253]  Jeremiah P. Malerich,et al.  Multi-step continuous flow synthesis of fluconazole , 2018, Journal of Flow Chemistry.