Aptamers can Discriminate Alkaline Proteins with High Specificity

Aptamers are single‐stranded nucleic acids that fold into stable three‐dimensional structures with ligand binding sites that are complementary in shape and charge to a desired target. Aptamers are generated by an iterative process known as in vitro selection, which permits their isolation from pools of random sequences. While aptamers have been selected to bind a wide range of targets, it is generally thought that these molecules are incapable of discriminating strongly alkaline proteins due to the attractive forces that govern oppositely charged polymers (e.g., polyelectrolyte effect). Histones, eukaryotic proteins that make up the core structure of nucleosomes are attractive targets for exploring the binding properties of aptamers because these proteins have positively charged surfaces that bind DNA through noncovalent sequence‐independent interactions. Previous selections by our lab and others have yielded DNA aptamers with high affinity but low specificity to individual histone proteins. Whether this is a general limitation of aptamers is an interesting question with important practical implications in the future development of protein affinity reagents. Here we report the in vitro selection of a DNA aptamer that binds to histone H4 with a Kd of 13 nM and distinguishes other core histone proteins with 100 to 480‐fold selectivity, which corresponds to a ΔΔG of up to 3.4 kcal mol−1. This result extends our fundamental understanding of aptamers and their ability to fold into shapes that selectively bind alkaline proteins.

[1]  T. Lohman,et al.  Kinetics of protein-nucleic acid interactions: use of salt effects to probe mechanisms of interaction. , 1986, CRC critical reviews in biochemistry.

[2]  Yi Lu,et al.  Label‐Free Colorimetric Detection of Lead Ions with a Nanomolar Detection Limit and Tunable Dynamic Range by using Gold Nanoparticles and DNAzyme , 2008 .

[3]  T. Richmond,et al.  Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution , 1997, Nature.

[4]  Michael Musheev,et al.  Non-SELEX selection of aptamers. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[5]  Juewen Liu,et al.  A simple and sensitive "dipstick" test in serum based on lateral flow separation of aptamer-linked nanostructures. , 2006, Angewandte Chemie.

[6]  M. Bowser,et al.  Capillary electrophoresis-SELEX selection of aptamers with affinity for HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  B. Sullenger,et al.  Developing aptamers into therapeutics. , 2000, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[8]  James M. Carothers,et al.  Informational Complexity and Functional Activity of RNA Structures , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[9]  V. Gonzalez,et al.  In vitro selection of Leishmania infantum H3-binding ssDNA aptamers. , 2010, Oligonucleotides.

[10]  Jijun Tang,et al.  The DNA aptamers that specifically recognize ricin toxin are selected by two in vitro selection methods , 2006, Electrophoresis.

[11]  Michael Famulok,et al.  Functional aptamers and aptazymes in biotechnology, diagnostics, and therapy. , 2007, Chemical reviews.

[12]  Manuel Soto,et al.  A DNA aptamer population specifically detects Leishmania infantum H2A antigen , 2007, Laboratory Investigation.

[13]  D. Drolet,et al.  Aptamer affinity chromatography: combinatorial chemistry applied to protein purification. , 1999, Journal of chromatography. B, Biomedical sciences and applications.

[14]  John C Chaput,et al.  In vitro selection of histone H4 aptamers for recognition imaging microscopy. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[15]  M. Mascini,et al.  Analytical applications of aptamers. , 2005, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[16]  S. Jayasena Aptamers: an emerging class of molecules that rival antibodies in diagnostics. , 1999, Clinical chemistry.

[17]  G. Mayer The chemical biology of aptamers. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[18]  A. Pardi,et al.  High-resolution molecular discrimination by RNA. , 1994, Science.

[19]  Rachel Ostroff,et al.  Photoaptamer arrays applied to multiplexed proteomic analysis , 2004, Proteomics.

[20]  L. Gold,et al.  Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment: RNA ligands to bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase. , 1990, Science.

[21]  M. Siddiqui,et al.  Pegaptanib , 2012, Drugs.

[22]  M Yarus,et al.  Diversity of oligonucleotide functions. , 1995, Annual review of biochemistry.

[23]  David E. Gloriam,et al.  ProteomeBinders: planning a European resource of affinity reagents for analysis of the human proteome , 2007, Nature Methods.

[24]  Michael Zuker,et al.  Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  D. Bunka,et al.  Aptamers come of age – at last , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[26]  P. Richardson,et al.  An improved method for the in vitro evolution of aptamers and applications in protein detection and purification. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[27]  Bhyravabhotla Jayaram,et al.  A theoretical study of polyelectrolyte effects in protein-DNA interactions: Monte Carlo free energy simulations on the ion atmosphere contribution to the thermodynamics of .lambda. repressor-operator complex formation , 1991 .

[28]  T. Tullius,et al.  Footprinting protein–DNA complexes using the hydroxyl radical , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[29]  J. Szostak,et al.  In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands , 1990, Nature.

[30]  L. Gold,et al.  Let's get specific: the relationship between specificity and affinity. , 1995, Chemistry & biology.

[31]  M. Famulok,et al.  Nucleic acid aptamers-from selection in vitro to applications in vivo. , 2000, Accounts of chemical research.

[32]  J. Szostak,et al.  In vitro selection of functional nucleic acids. , 1999, Annual review of biochemistry.

[33]  G. Mayer Die chemische Biologie von Aptameren , 2009 .

[34]  D. Patel,et al.  Structure, recognition and discrimination in RNA aptamer complexes with cofactors, amino acids, drugs and aminoglycoside antibiotics. , 2000, Journal of biotechnology.

[35]  D. Drolet,et al.  An enzyme-linked oligonucleotide assay , 1996, Nature Biotechnology.

[36]  T. Lohman,et al.  A double-filter method for nitrocellulose-filter binding: application to protein-nucleic acid interactions. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Sergey N Krylov,et al.  Non-SELEX: selection of aptamers without intermediate amplification of candidate oligonucleotides , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[38]  Jack W. Szostak,et al.  A Small Aptamer with Strong and Specific Recognition of the Triphosphate of ATP , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[39]  Joshua A Bittker,et al.  Recent advances in the in vitro evolution of nucleic acids. , 2002, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[40]  J. Feigon,et al.  Thrombin-binding DNA aptamer forms a unimolecular quadruplex structure in solution. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  M. Bowser,et al.  In vitro selection of aptamers with affinity for neuropeptide Y using capillary electrophoresis. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[42]  B. Sullenger,et al.  Crystal structure of an RNA aptamer bound to thrombin. , 2008, RNA.

[43]  M. Bowser,et al.  In vitro evolution of functional DNA using capillary electrophoresis. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[44]  John C Chaput,et al.  Evolution of a histone H4-K16 acetyl-specific DNA aptamer. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[45]  J. Szostak,et al.  Aptamers selected for higher-affinity binding are not more specific for the target ligand. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.