Regional governance and hazard information: the role of co-ordinated risk assessment and regional spatial accounting in wildfire hazard mitigation

With the threat of wildfire hanging over many communities in the Western and Southern United States, wildfire mitigation is evolving into a significant public responsibility for rural and urban edge county governments. Regional governance is an important piece of the effort to reduce wildfire risks although still weakly developed as a policy arena. This project explores two dimensions in which planning support systems can support regional governance: assessing patterns of wildfire risk accumulation; and, evaluating land use planning alternatives and their effects on cumulative risk levels. These tools are examined for regional governance using a prototype planning information system, the Alternative Growth Futures (AGF) tool, a scenario-building approach developed at the University of Colorado Denver. The project develops a hybrid urban growth model that integrates logistic regression techniques and methods for simulation of growth alternatives. This model is used to evaluate the attractiveness of undeveloped building sites with respect to natural amenities, distance to primary urban services and site characteristics such as slope. The model and scenario-testing framework are reasonably robust and suggest that regional spatial accounting methods have potential as a framework for inter-governmental and public discussion around wildfire planning.

[1]  G. Busenberg.  Wildfire Management in the United States: The Evolution of a Policy Failure , 2004 .

[2]  R. Werner,et al.  Fire and insects in northern and boreal forest ecosystems of North America. , 1998, Annual review of entomology.

[3]  John D. Landis,et al.  How We Will Grow: Baseline Projections of the Growth of California's Urban Footprint through the Year 2100 , 2003 .

[4]  W. D. McTACGART.  BIOREGIONALISM AND REGIONAL GEOGRAPHY: PLACE, PEOPLE, AND NETWORKS , 1993 .

[5]  P. Schoemaker.  MULTIPLE SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT: ITS CONCEPTUAL AND BEHAVIORAL FOUNDATION , 1993 .

[6]  K. Widaman,et al.  The risk perceptions and policy response toward wildland fire hazards by urban home-owners , 1987 .

[7]  E. Lambin,et al.  Predicting land-use change , 2001 .

[8]  Ming Zhang,et al.  The Second Generation of the California Urban Futures Model. Part 2: Specification and Calibration Results of the Land-Use Change Submodel , 1998 .

[9]  Jeffrey L. Arthur,et al.  Spatial-Endogenous Fire Risk and Efficient Fuel Management and Timber Harvest , 2008, Land Economics.

[10]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  The Use of Scenarios in Land-Use Planning , 2003 .

[11]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Scenario Planning: a Tool for Conservation in an Uncertain World , 2003, Conservation Biology.

[12]  E. Gramlich,et al.  Infrastructure Investment: A Review Essay , 1994 .

[13]  Peter Schwartz,et al.  The art of the long view : paths to strategic insight for yourself and your company , 1996 .

[14]  Warren L. Ziegler.  Envisioning the future , 1991 .

[15]  D. Theobald.  Landscape Patterns of Exurban Growth in the USA from 1980 to 2020 , 2005 .

[16]  Richard E. Klosterman,et al.  The What If? Collaborative Planning Support System , 1999 .

[17]  Olga V. Wilhelmi,et al.  Reducing Drought Risk: Bridging Theory and Practice , 2004 .

[18]  H. Couclelis.  “Where has the Future Gone?” Rethinking the Role of Integrated Land-Use Models in Spatial Planning , 2005 .

[19]  D. Myers.  Demographic Futures as a Guide to Planning: California's Latinos and the Compact City , 2001 .

[20]  Volker C. Radeloff,et al.  Rural and Suburban Sprawl in the U.S. Midwest from 1940 to 2000 and Its Relation to Forest Fragmentation , 2005 .

[21]  J. Landis,et al.  The Second Generation of the California Urban Futures Model. Part 1: Model Logic and Theory , 1998 .

[22]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Regional transportation planning in the US: An examination of changes in technical aspects of the planning process in response to changing goals , 2008 .

[23]  J. Fried,et al.  Homeowner Perspectives on Fire Hazard, Responsibility, and Management Strategies at the Wildland-Urban Interface , 2000 .

[24]  Jesse Abrams,et al.  Living among Frequent-fire Forests: Human History and Cultural Perspectives , 2007 .

[25]  Erin Bohensky,et al.  Young Scholars Dialogue, part of a Special Feature on Scenarios of global ecosystem services Linking Futures across Scales: a Dialog on Multiscale Scenarios , 2007 .

[26]  T. Veblen.  Key Issues in Fire Regime Research for Fuels Management and Ecological Restoration , 2003 .

[27]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  Loose-Coupling a Cellular Automaton Model and GIS: Long-Term Urban Growth Prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[28]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[29]  R. Feiock.  Rational Choice and Regional Governance , 2007 .

[30]  Timothy W. Collins,et al.  Households, forests, and fire hazard vulnerability in the American West: A case study of a California community , 2005 .

[31]  Causasilty among wildfire, ENSO, timber harvest, and urban sprawl: The vector autoregression approach , 2006 .

[32]  Michael Batty,et al.  Automata-based exploration of emergent urban form , 1997 .

[33]  Raymond J. Burby,et al.  Plans Can Matter! The Role of Land Use Plans and State Planning Mandates in Limiting the Development of Hazardous Areas , 1994 .

[34]  E. J. Kaiser,et al.  Unleashing the Power of Planning to Create Disaster-Resistant Communities , 1999 .

[35]  P. Wilding.  Globalization, Regionalism and Social Policy , 1997 .

[36]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[37]  Raymond J. Burby,et al.  Creating Hazard Resilient Communities through Land-Use Planning , 2000 .

[38]  Matthias Ruth,et al.  Using Dynamic Modeling to Scope Environmental Problems and Build Consensus , 1998, Environmental management.

[39]  Ted K. Bradshaw,et al.  Impacts of Rapid Urban Growth on Farmland Conversion: Application of New Regional Land Use Policy Models and Geographical Information Systems1 , 2010 .