Performance prediction of roadheaders using ensemble machine learning techniques

Mechanical excavators are widely used in mining, tunneling and civil engineering projects. There are several types of mechanical excavators, such as a roadheader, tunnel boring machine and impact hammer. This is because these tools can bring productivity to the project quickly, accurately and safely. Among these, roadheaders have some advantages like selective mining, mobility, less over excavation, minimal ground disturbances, elimination of blast vibration, reduced ventilation requirements and initial investment cost. A critical issue in successful roadheader application is the ability to evaluate and predict the machine performance named instantaneous (net) cutting rate. Although there are several prediction methods in the literature, for the prediction of roadheader performance, only a few of them have been developed via artificial neural network techniques. In this study, for this purpose, 333 data sets including uniaxial compressive strength and power on cutting boom, 103 data set including RQD, and 125 data sets including machine weight are accumulated from the literature. This paper focuses on roadheader performance prediction using six different machine learning algorithms and a combination of various machine learning algorithms via ensemble techniques. Algorithms are ZeroR, random forest (RF), Gaussian process, linear regression, logistic regression and multi-layer perceptron (MLP). As a result, MLP and RF give better results than the other algorithms also the best solution achieved was bagging technique on RF and principle component analysis (PCA). The best success rate obtained in this study is 90.2% successful prediction, and it is relatively better than contemporary research.

[1]  H. Copur,et al.  Roadheader applications in mining and tunneling industries , 2000 .

[2]  Dimitris Kaliampakos,et al.  Modelling TBM performance with artificial neural networks , 2004 .

[3]  Yong Wang,et al.  Using Model Trees for Classification , 1998, Machine Learning.

[4]  Kourosh Shahriar,et al.  A model to predict the performance of roadheaders based on the Rock Mass Brittleness Index , 2011 .

[5]  Candan Gokceoglu,et al.  Estimation of rock modulus: For intact rocks with an artificial neural network and for rock masses with a new empirical equation , 2006 .

[6]  Abbas Aghajani Bazzazi,et al.  Comparison Between Neural Networks and Multiple Regression Analysis to Predict Rock Fragmentation in Open-Pit Mines , 2014, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[7]  M. Alvarez Grima,et al.  Modeling tunnel boring machine performance by neuro-fuzzy methods , 2000 .

[8]  E. T. Brown Rock characterization, testing & monitoring: ISRM suggested methods , 1981 .

[9]  Sadi Evren Seker,et al.  Estimation of Elastic Modulus of Intact Rocks by Artificial Neural Network , 2012, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[10]  I. Farmer,et al.  Prediction Of Roadheader Cutting Performance From Fracture Toughness Considerations , 1987 .

[11]  Abdolreza Yazdani-Chamzini,et al.  Predicting roadheader performance by using artificial neural network , 2013, Neural Computing and Applications.

[12]  Nuh Bilgin,et al.  A Model to Predict the Performance of Roadheaders And Impact Hammers In Tunnel Drivages , 1996 .

[13]  O. J. Santos,et al.  Artificial neural networks analysis of São Paulo subway tunnel settlement data , 2008 .

[14]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[15]  Nuh Bilgin,et al.  ROADHEADERS GLEAN VALUABLE TIPS FOR ISTANBUL METRO , 1990 .

[16]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Decision tree regression for soft classification of remote sensing data , 2005 .

[17]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Stacked regressions , 2004, Machine Learning.

[18]  R. J. Fowell,et al.  Prediction of Boom Tunnelling Machine Excavation Rates , 1994 .

[19]  Gholamnejad Javad,et al.  Application of artificial neural networks to the prediction of tunnel boring machine penetration rate , 2010 .

[20]  D. Tumac,et al.  Prediction of roadheader performance by artificial neural network , 2014 .

[21]  S. Sathiya Keerthi,et al.  Improvements to the SMO algorithm for SVM regression , 2000, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst..

[22]  Sadi Evren Seker,et al.  Calculation of surface settlements caused by EPBM tunneling using artificial neural network, SVM, and Gaussian processes , 2013, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[23]  Gary B. Hemphill,et al.  Practical Tunnel Construction: Hemphill/Practical Tunnel Construction , 2012 .

[24]  H. Schneider,et al.  Criteria for selecting a boom-type roadheader : Min MagSept 1988, P183–187 , 1989 .

[25]  Arash Ebrahimabadi,et al.  Prediction of roadheaders' performance using artificial neural network approaches (MLP and KOSFM) , 2015 .

[26]  S. Chehreh Chelgani,et al.  Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength and modulus of elasticity for Travertine samples using regression and artificial neural networks , 2010 .

[27]  Yingjie Yang,et al.  A hierarchical analysis for rock engineering using artificial neural networks , 1997 .

[28]  Ibrahim Ocak,et al.  Comparative studies on the performance of a roadheader, impact hammer and drilling and blasting method in the excavation of metro station tunnels in Istanbul , 2010 .

[29]  L. Buydens,et al.  Facilitating the application of Support Vector Regression by using a universal Pearson VII function based kernel , 2006 .

[30]  H. Copur,et al.  Some geological and geotechnical factors affecting the performance of a roadheader in an inclined tunnel , 2004 .

[31]  Jingsheng Shi,et al.  MODULAR NEURAL NETWORKS FOR PREDICTING SETTLEMENTS DURING TUNNELING , 1998 .

[32]  Hiroshi Ohyama,et al.  Studies on performance prediction of heavy weight transverse roadheaders based on field data in tunneling projects , 2010 .

[33]  M. P. Roy,et al.  Application of artificial neural network in mining industry , 2004 .

[34]  Zhi-Hua Zhou,et al.  Ensemble Methods: Foundations and Algorithms , 2012 .

[35]  S. Kahramana,et al.  Sawability prediction of carbonate rocks from shear strength parameters using artificial neural networks , 2005 .

[36]  Kourosh Shahriar,et al.  A Universal Model to Predict Roadheaders' Cutting Performance / Uniwersalny Model Do Prognozowania Postępu Prac Kombajnów Do Drążenia Tuneli , 2012 .

[37]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK APPLICATIONS IN GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING , 2001 .

[38]  I. Yılmaz,et al.  An Example of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Application for Indirect Estimation of Rock Parameters , 2008 .

[39]  Yali Amit,et al.  Shape Quantization and Recognition with Randomized Trees , 1997, Neural Computation.

[40]  Kurosch Thuro PREDICTING ROADHEADER ADVANCE RATES: GEOLOGICAL CHALLENGES AND GEOTECHNICAL ANSWERS , 2003 .

[41]  Jamal Rostami,et al.  Performance prediction: a key issue in mechanical hard rock mining , 1995 .

[42]  T. N. Singh,et al.  Prediction of strength properties of some schistose rocks from petrographic properties using artificial neural networks , 2001 .

[43]  S. Suwansawat,et al.  Artificial neural networks for predicting the maximum surface settlement caused by EPB shield tunneling , 2006 .

[44]  Cemal Balci,et al.  Performance prediction of roadheaders in metallic ore excavation , 2014 .

[45]  Jiancong Xu,et al.  Grey correlation-hierarchical analysis for metro-caused settlement , 2011 .

[46]  C. Balci,et al.  Estimation of optimum specific energy based on rock properties for assessment of roadheader performance , 2004 .

[47]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[48]  Suchatvee Suwansawat Earth pressure balance (EPB) shield tunneling in Bangkok : ground response and prediction of surface settlements using artificial neural networks , 2002 .