Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are generally accepted to be the most biologically significant lesion by which ionizing radiation causes cancer and hereditary disease. However, no information on the induction and processing of DSBs after physiologically relevant radiation doses is available. Many of the methods used to measure DSB repair inadvertently introduce this form of damage as part of the methodology, and hence are limited in their sensitivity. Here we present evidence that foci of γ-H2AX (a phosphorylated histone), detected by immunofluorescence, are quantitatively the same as DSBs and are capable of quantifying the repair of individual DSBs. This finding allows the investigation of DSB repair after radiation doses as low as 1 mGy, an improvement by several orders of magnitude over current methods. Surprisingly, DSBs induced in cultures of nondividing primary human fibroblasts by very low radiation doses (≈1 mGy) remain unrepaired for many days, in strong contrast to efficient DSB repair that is observed at higher doses. However, the level of DSBs in irradiated cultures decreases to that of unirradiated cell cultures if the cells are allowed to proliferate after irradiation, and we present evidence that this effect may be caused by an elimination of the cells carrying unrepaired DSBs. The results presented are in contrast to current models of risk assessment that assume that cellular responses are equally efficient at low and high doses, and provide the opportunity to employ γ-H2AX foci formation as a direct biomarker for human exposure to low quantities of ionizing radiation.

[1]  Thomas Ried,et al.  AID is required to initiate Nbs1/γ-H2AX focus formation and mutations at sites of class switching , 2001, Nature.

[2]  E. Rogakou,et al.  Megabase Chromatin Domains Involved in DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Vivo , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  P. Jeggo,et al.  Radiation-induced genomic rearrangements formed by nonhomologous end-joining of DNA double-strand breaks. , 2001, Cancer research.

[4]  J. Hoeijmakers,et al.  Chromosomal stability and the DNA double-stranded break connection , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[5]  E. Hall,et al.  Induction of a bystander mutagenic effect of alpha particles in mammalian cells. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  J. Hoeijmakers Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer , 2001, Nature.

[7]  V. Yamazaki,et al.  A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage , 2000, Current Biology.

[8]  S. Keeney,et al.  Recombinational DNA double-strand breaks in mice precede synapsis , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[9]  Thomas Ried,et al.  Response to RAG-mediated V(D)J cleavage by NBS1 and γ-H2AX , 2000 .

[10]  Michael M. Murphy,et al.  ATM Phosphorylates Histone H2AX in Response to DNA Double-strand Breaks* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  E. Rogakou,et al.  DNA Double-stranded Breaks Induce Histone H2AX Phosphorylation on Serine 139* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  P. Jeggo,et al.  A DNA double-strand break defective fibroblast cell line (180BR) derived from a radiosensitive patient represents a new mutant phenotype. , 1997, Cancer research.

[13]  M. Löbrich,et al.  Repair of x-ray-induced DNA double-strand breaks in specific Not I restriction fragments in human fibroblasts: joining of correct and incorrect ends. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  P Lambin,et al.  Low-dose hypersensitivity: current status and possible mechanisms. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  E. Rogakou,et al.  Quantitative Detection of 125IdU-Induced DNA Double-Strand Breaks with γ-H2AX Antibody , 2002 .

[16]  Y. Pommier,et al.  Initiation of DNA Fragmentation during Apoptosis Induces Phosphorylation of H2AX Histone at Serine 139* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  R. Kanaar,et al.  DNA repair: Spot(light)s on chromatin , 2001, Current Biology.

[18]  B M Sutherland,et al.  Clustered DNA damages induced in isolated DNA and in human cells by low doses of ionizing radiation. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  M. Löbrich,et al.  Efficient Rejoining of Radiation-induced DNA Double-strand Breaks in Centromeric DNA of Human Cells* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  E. Rogakou,et al.  Histone H2A variants H2AX and H2AZ. , 2002, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[21]  岩崎 民子 SOURCES AND EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION : United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes , 2002 .

[22]  J. Little,et al.  Unexpected sensitivity to the induction of mutations by very low doses of alpha-particle radiation: evidence for a bystander effect. , 1999, Radiation research.

[23]  P. Jeggo,et al.  Identification of a defect in DNA ligase IV in a radiosensitive leukaemia patient , 1999, Current Biology.

[24]  K M Prise,et al.  Studies of bystander effects in human fibroblasts using a charged particle microbeam. , 1998, International journal of radiation biology.

[25]  J. Little,et al.  Induction of sister chromatid exchanges by extremely low doses of alpha-particles. , 1992, Cancer research.