Online, Interactive Tutorials Provide Effective Instruction in Science Process Skills

Explicit emphasis on teaching science process skills leads to both gains in the skills themselves and, strikingly, deeper understanding of content. Here, we created and tested a series of online, interactive tutorials with the goal of helping undergraduate students develop science process skills. We designed the tutorials in accordance with evidence-based multimedia design principles and student feedback from usability testing. We then tested the efficacy of the tutorials in an introductory undergraduate biology class. Based on a multivariate ordinary least squares regression model, students that received the tutorials are predicted to score 0.824 points higher on a 15 point science process skill assessment than their peers that received traditional textbook instruction on the same topic. This moderate but significant impact indicates that well designed online tutorials can be more effective than traditional ways of teaching science process skills to undergraduate students. We also found trends that suggest the tutorials are especially effective for non-native English speaking students. However, due to a limited sample size, we were unable to confirm that these trends occurred due to more than just variation in the sampled student group.

[1]  Philip J. Guo,et al.  How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos , 2014, L@S.

[2]  Miriam Segura-Totten,et al.  The CREATE Method Does Not Result in Greater Gains in Critical Thinking than a More Traditional Method of Analyzing the Primary Literature † , 2013, Journal of microbiology & biology education.

[3]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  The effects of realism in learning with dynamic visualizations , 2009 .

[5]  J. Horton,et al.  Effects of a Research-Infused Botanical Curriculum on Undergraduates’ Content Knowledge, STEM Competencies, and Attitudes toward Plant Sciences , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[6]  Clarissa Dirks,et al.  Teaching the Process of Science: Faculty Perceptions and an Effective Methodology , 2010, CBE life sciences education.

[7]  Alison Crowe,et al.  Biology in bloom: implementing Bloom's Taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology. , 2008, CBE life sciences education.

[8]  Sara E. Brownell,et al.  A High-Enrollment Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience Improves Student Conceptions of Scientific Thinking and Ability to Interpret Data , 2015, CBE life sciences education.

[9]  Noah L. Schroeder,et al.  Efficacy of a Meiosis Learning Module Developed for the Virtual Cell Animation Collection , 2017, CBE life sciences education.

[10]  Selen Turkay,et al.  The effects of whiteboard animations on retention and subjective experiences when learning advanced physics topics , 2016 .

[11]  Alan J. Gottesman,et al.  CREATE Cornerstone: Introduction to Scientific Thinking, a New Course for STEM-Interested Freshmen, Demystifies Scientific Thinking through Analysis of Scientific Literature , 2013, CBE life sciences education.

[12]  Suzanne Reeve,et al.  Teaching cell biology in the large-enrollment classroom: methods to promote analytical thinking and assessment of their effectiveness. , 2003, Cell biology education.

[13]  R. Mayer Applying the science of learning: evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. , 2008, The American psychologist.

[14]  Sally G. Hoskins,et al.  The CREATE Strategy for Intensive Analysis of Primary Literature Can Be Used Effectively by Newly Trained Faculty to Produce Multiple Gains in Diverse Students , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[15]  R. Moreno Decreasing Cognitive Load for Novice Students: Effects of Explanatory versus Corrective Feedback in Discovery-Based Multimedia , 2004 .

[16]  Sally G. Hoskins,et al.  The C.R.E.A.T.E. Approach to Primary Literature Shifts Undergraduates’ Self-Assessed Ability to Read and Analyze Journal Articles, Attitudes about Science, and Epistemological Beliefs , 2011, CBE life sciences education.

[17]  Clarissa Dirks,et al.  Enhancing diversity in science: is teaching science process skills the answer? , 2006, CBE life sciences education.

[18]  Lisa Daniels,et al.  Molecular and cellular biology animations: development and impact on student learning. , 2005, Cell biology education.

[19]  James R. Okey,et al.  Development of an integrated process skill test: TIPS II , 1985 .

[20]  Jan L. Plass,et al.  Interactivity in multimedia learning: An integrated model , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[22]  S. Debburman,et al.  Learning how scientists work: experiential research projects to promote cell biology learning and scientific process skills. , 2002, Cell biology education.

[23]  Charles F. Abel,et al.  Academic success and the international student: Research and recommendations , 2002 .

[24]  Anthony Carpi Improvements in Undergraduate Science Education Using Web-Based Instructional Modules: The Natural Science Pages , 2001 .

[25]  S. Narciss The impact of informative tutoring feedback and self-efficacy on motivation and achievement in concept learning. , 2004, Experimental psychology.

[26]  Louisa A. Stark,et al.  A Primer for Developing Measures of Science Content Knowledge for Small-Scale Research and Instructional Use , 2016, CBE life sciences education.

[27]  Michael W. Klymkowsky,et al.  Revealing Student Thinking about Experimental Design and the Roles of Control Experiments , 2011 .

[28]  Alun Anderson Planned NSF centres to boost economy may gain from funding , 1987, Nature.

[29]  G Wiggins,et al.  Understanding by design (expanded 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[30]  Paul D. Sampson,et al.  Facilitating Long-Term Changes in Student Approaches to Learning Science , 2012, CBE life sciences education.

[31]  Wytze Brouwer,et al.  The Sharing of Personal Science and the Narrative Element in Science Education. , 1991 .

[32]  Sally G Hoskins,et al.  Selective Use of the Primary Literature Transforms the Classroom Into a Virtual Laboratory , 2007, Genetics.

[33]  Eric H. Chudler,et al.  Explain the Brain: Websites to Help Scientists Teach Neuroscience to the General Public , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[34]  Michael W Klymkowsky,et al.  Points of view: content versus process: is this a fair choice? Can nonmajors courses lead to biological literacy? Do majors courses do any better? , 2005, Cell biology education.

[35]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[36]  Alan J. Gottesman,et al.  Testing CREATE at Community Colleges: An Examination of Faculty Perspectives and Diverse Student Gains , 2016, CBE life sciences education.

[37]  Gili Marbach-Ad,et al.  Enhancing Scientific Literacy in the Undergraduate Cell Biology Laboratory Classroom† , 2016, Journal of microbiology & biology education.

[38]  Susan L. Silver,et al.  Are Online Tutorials Effective? A Comparison of Online and Classroom Library Instruction Methods. , 2005 .

[39]  Nicola J. Gibbons,et al.  The interactivity effect in multimedia learning , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[40]  Olga Kritskaya,et al.  Best Practices for Creating an Online Tutorial: A Literature Review , 2009 .