Use of bionic inspired surfaces for aerodynamic drag reduction on motor vehicle body panels

Inspired by the successful applications of biological non-smoothness, we introduced bionic non-smooth surfaces as appendices into vehicle body design, aiming to further reduce aerodynamic drag. The size range of the non-smooth units with pits and grooves was determined according to our analysis with the mechanisms underlying non-smooth unit mediated aerodynamic drag reduction. The bionic non-smooth units reported here were designed to adapt the structure of a given vehicle body from the point of boundary layer control that reduces the burst and the loss of turbulent kinetic energy. The engine cover lid and vehicle body cap were individually treated with the non-smooth units, and the treated vehicles were subjected to aerodynamic drag coefficient simulation tests using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis method. The simulation results showed that, in comparison with smooth surfaces, properly designed non-smooth surfaces can have greater effects on drag reduction. The mechanism underlying drag reduction mediated by non-smooth surfaces was revealed by further analyses, in which the effects of non-smooth and smooth surfaces were directly compared.

[1]  Ryutaro Hino,et al.  Turbulent drag reduction by the seal fur surface , 2006 .

[2]  Turbulent flow over thin rectangular riblets , 2005 .

[3]  M. Koike,et al.  Research on Aerodynamic Drag Reduction by Vortex Generators , .

[4]  William L. Sellers,et al.  Riblet drag at flight conditions , 1989 .

[5]  Tian Limei Experimental Study on Drag Reduction for Bodies of Revolution Using Bionic Non-Smoothness , 2005 .

[6]  Mohamed Gad-el-Hak,et al.  Compliant coatings: The simpler alternative , 1998 .

[7]  Ho-Hwan Chun,et al.  Drag reduction of turbulent flow over thin rectangular riblets , 2007 .

[8]  William L. Sellers,et al.  Riblet drag reduction at flight conditions , 1988 .

[9]  C. Brücker,et al.  Streaming and mixing induced by a bundle of ciliary vibrating micro-pillars , 2010 .

[10]  R. Bullen,et al.  The pelage of bats (Chiroptera) and the presence of aerodynamic riblets: the effect on aerodynamic cleanliness. , 2008, Zoology.

[11]  Stephen A. Whitmore,et al.  Drag Reduction on Blunt-Based Vehicles Using Forebody Surface Roughness , 2002 .

[13]  B. Launder,et al.  The numerical computation of turbulent flows , 1990 .

[14]  Weeratunge Malalasekera,et al.  An introduction to computational fluid dynamics - the finite volume method , 2007 .

[15]  L. Sirovich,et al.  Turbulent drag reduction by passive mechanisms , 1997, Nature.

[16]  Luquan Ren,et al.  Effects of biomimetic surface designs on furrow opener performance , 2009 .

[17]  Toshiyuki Hayase,et al.  Fundamental Study of Aerodynamic Drag Reduction for Vehicle with Feedback Flow Control , 2004 .

[18]  Shailja Singh,et al.  Effect of moving surface on the aerodynamic drag of road vehicles , 2005 .

[19]  C. Cossu,et al.  Delaying transition to turbulence by a passive mechanism. , 2006, Physical review letters.