ADME of Antibody–Maytansinoid Conjugates

The concept of treating cancer with antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) has gained momentum with the favorable activity and safety of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), SAR3419, and lorvotuzumab mertansine (IMGN901). All three ADCs utilize maytansinoid cell-killing agents which target tubulin and suppress microtubule dynamics. Each ADC utilizes a different optimized chemical linker to attach the maytansinoid to the antibody. Characterizing the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) of these ADCs in preclinical animal models is important to understanding their efficacy and safety profiles. The ADME properties of these ADCs in rodents were inferred from studies with radio-labeled ADCs prepared with nonbinding antibodies since T-DM1, SAR3419, IMGN901 all lack cross-reactivity with rodent antigens. For studies exploring tumor localization and activation in tumor-bearing mice, tritium-labeled T-DM1, SAR3419, and IMGN901 were utilized. The chemical nature of the linker was found to have a significant impact on the ADME properties of these ADCs—particularly on the plasma pharmacokinetics and observed catabolites in tumor and liver tissues. Despite these differences, T-DM1, SAR3419, and IMGN901 were all found to facilitate efficient deliveries of active maytansinoid catabolites to the tumor tissue in mouse xenograft models. In addition, all three ADCs were effectively detoxified during hepatobiliary elimination in rodents.

[1]  P. LoRusso,et al.  Catabolic fate and pharmacokinetic characterization of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1): an emphasis on preclinical and clinical catabolism. , 2012, Current drug metabolism.

[2]  B. Gunter,et al.  The Effect of Different Linkers on Target Cell Catabolism and Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Trastuzumab Maytansinoid Conjugates , 2012, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[3]  M. Sliwkowski,et al.  Conjugation site modulates the in vivo stability and therapeutic activity of antibody-drug conjugates , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  Dan Lu,et al.  Clinical pharmacology of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1): an antibody–drug conjugate in development for the treatment of HER2-positive cancer , 2012, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[5]  J. Pinkas,et al.  Abstract B195: Lorvotuzumab mertansine displays favorable pharmacokinetics and tumor delivery in mouse models. , 2011 .

[6]  R. Lutz,et al.  SAR3419: An Anti-CD19-Maytansinoid Immunoconjugate for the Treatment of B-Cell Malignancies , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[7]  M. Sliwkowski,et al.  Trastuzumab Emtansine: A Unique Antibody-Drug Conjugate in Development for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Cancer , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[8]  F. Theil,et al.  Impact of drug conjugation on pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of anti-STEAP1 antibody-drug conjugates in rats. , 2011, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[9]  K. Kiick,et al.  Tunable degradation of maleimide-thiol adducts in reducing environments. , 2011, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[10]  E. K. Maloney,et al.  A novel pathway for maytansinoid release from thioether linked antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) under oxidative conditions. , 2011, Chemical communications.

[11]  R. Lutz,et al.  Disulfide-linked antibody-maytansinoid conjugates: optimization of in vivo activity by varying the steric hindrance at carbon atoms adjacent to the disulfide linkage. , 2011, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[12]  Rajeeva Singh,et al.  Design of antibody-maytansinoid conjugates allows for efficient detoxification via liver metabolism. , 2011, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[13]  M. Sliwkowski,et al.  Trastuzumab-DM1 (T-DM1) retains all the mechanisms of action of trastuzumab and efficiently inhibits growth of lapatinib insensitive breast cancer , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[14]  M. Sliwkowski,et al.  Clinical Cancer esearch cer Therapy : Preclinical ineered Thio-Trastuzumab-DM 1 Conjugate with an roved Therapeutic Index to Target Human Epidermal R wth Factor Receptor 2 – Positive Breast Cancer , 2010 .

[15]  Suzanne F. Jones,et al.  Phase I study of trastuzumab-DM1, an HER2 antibody-drug conjugate, given every 3 weeks to patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  J. Lambert Antibody-maytansinoid conjugates: A new strategy for the treatment of cancer , 2010, Drugs of the Future.

[17]  S. Jagannath,et al.  Phase I Study of BT062 Given as Repeated Single Dose Once Every 3 Weeks in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. , 2009 .

[18]  L. Gordon,et al.  Phase I Multi-Dose Escalation Study of the Anti-CD19 Maytansinoid Immunoconjugate SAR3419 Administered by Intravenous (IV) Infusion Every 3 Weeks to Patients with Relapsed/ Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL). , 2009 .

[19]  S. Jagannath,et al.  Phase I Study of IMGN901, Used as Monotherapy, in Patients with Heavily Pre-Treated CD56-Positive Multiple Myeloma - A Preliminary Safety and Efficacy Analysis. , 2009 .

[20]  D. Benjamin,et al.  The Pharmacologic Basis for Antibody-Auristatin Conjugate Activity , 2009, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[21]  Rajeeva Singh,et al.  Antibody-cytotoxic agent conjugates: preparation and characterization. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[22]  J. Leonard,et al.  Multiple Complete Responses in a Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study of the Antibody-Drug Conjugate SGN-35 in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory CD30-Positive Lymphomas. , 2008 .

[23]  John M Lambert,et al.  Targeting HER2-positive breast cancer with trastuzumab-DM1, an antibody-cytotoxic drug conjugate. , 2008, Cancer research.

[24]  K Dane Wittrup,et al.  Antibody tumor penetration: transport opposed by systemic and antigen-mediated clearance. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[25]  A. Ebens,et al.  Anti-CD22-MCC-DM1 and MC-MMAF conjugates: impact of assay format on pharmacokinetic parameters determination. , 2008, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[26]  R. Chari Targeted cancer therapy: conferring specificity to cytotoxic drugs. , 2008, Accounts of chemical research.

[27]  Alastair H Kyle,et al.  Direct Visualization of Heterogeneous Extravascular Distribution of Trastuzumab in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Type 2 Overexpressing Xenografts , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[28]  Damon L. Meyer,et al.  Contribution of linker stability to the activities of anticancer immunoconjugates. , 2008, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[29]  Bart Cornelissen,et al.  Associations between the uptake of 111In-DTPA-trastuzumab, HER2 density and response to trastuzumab (Herceptin) in athymic mice bearing subcutaneous human tumour xenografts , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[30]  R. Lutz,et al.  Linker selection in antibody-maytansinoid conjugates impacts bystander killing in mouse xenograft models , 2007 .

[31]  V. Goldmacher,et al.  Cell killing by antibody-drug conjugates. , 2007, Cancer letters.

[32]  W. Cai,et al.  Quantitative radioimmunoPET imaging of EphA2 in tumor-bearing mice , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[33]  Yelena Kovtun,et al.  Semisynthetic maytansine analogues for the targeted treatment of cancer. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[34]  R. Lutz,et al.  Antibody-maytansinoid conjugates are activated in targeted cancer cells by lysosomal degradation and linker-dependent intracellular processing. , 2006, Cancer research.

[35]  T. Chittenden,et al.  Antibody-drug conjugates designed to eradicate tumors with homogeneous and heterogeneous expression of the target antigen. , 2006, Cancer research.

[36]  Hongsheng Xie,et al.  In vivo behaviour of antibody–drug conjugates for the targeted treatment of cancer , 2006, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[37]  J. Lambert Drug-conjugated monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of cancer. , 2005, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[38]  Suzanne V. Smith Technology evaluation: huN901-DM1, ImmunoGen. , 2005, Current opinion in molecular therapeutics.

[39]  O. Boerman,et al.  The effect of antibody protein dose on the uniformity of tumor distribution of radioantibodies: An autoradiographic study , 2005, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.

[40]  A. Rajasekaran,et al.  Biological impediments to monoclonal antibody-based cancer immunotherapy. , 2004, Molecular cancer therapeutics.

[41]  Damon L. Meyer,et al.  Effects of Drug Loading on the Antitumor Activity of a Monoclonal Antibody Drug Conjugate , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[42]  Hongsheng Xie,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution of the Antitumor Immunoconjugate, Cantuzumab Mertansine (huC242-DM1), and Its Two Components in Mice , 2004, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[43]  A. Tolcher,et al.  Cantuzumab mertansine, a maytansinoid immunoconjugate directed to the CanAg antigen: a phase I, pharmacokinetic, and biologic correlative study. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[44]  S. Morrison,et al.  In vivo trafficking and catabolism of IgG1 antibodies with Fc associated carbohydrates of differing structure. , 2000, Glycobiology.

[45]  R K Jain,et al.  Transport of molecules, particles, and cells in solid tumors. , 1999, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[46]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Micropharmacology of monoclonal antibodies in solid tumors: direct experimental evidence for a binding site barrier. , 1992, Cancer research.

[47]  E. Hamel,et al.  Dolastatin 15, a potent antimitotic depsipeptide derived from Dolabella auricularia. Interaction with tubulin and effects of cellular microtubules. , 1992, Biochemical pharmacology.

[48]  K. Bosslet,et al.  Antibodies as Carriers of Cytotoxicity , 1992 .