Foraging innovation is inversely related to competitive ability in male but not in female guppies

Foraging success is likely to affect hunger level and motivation to locate and exploit novel food sources in animals. We explored the relationship between scramble competition for limited food and foraging innovation in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata), predicting that poor competitors would be more likely to innovate when presented with novel foraging tasks. Among males, we found that latency to complete novel foraging tasks was correlated both with weight gain and number of food items consumed, suggesting that poor competitors are more likely to innovate. However, among females there was no relationship between innovative tendency and either weight gain or foraging success. We suggest that this sex difference may reflect parental investment asymmetries in males and females, and we predict similar sex differences in other species.

[1]  W. Köhler The Mentality of Apes. , 2018, Nature.

[2]  K. Laland,et al.  Who follows whom? Shoaling preferences and social learning of foraging information in guppies , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  K. Laland,et al.  Shoaling generates social learning of foraging information in guppies , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  L. Lefebvre,et al.  Feeding innovations and forebrain size in birds , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  M. Feldman,et al.  Individual Versus Social Learning: Evolutionary Analysis in a Fluctuating Environment , 1996 .

[6]  A. Magurran,et al.  Sexual conflict as a consequence of ecology: evidence from guppy, Poecilia reticulata, populations in Trinidad , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  Female mate copying in the guppy {Poecilia reticulata): age-dependent effects , 1993 .

[8]  A. Magurran,et al.  Evolution of adaptive variation in antipredator behaviour , 1993 .

[9]  W. McGrew Tools Compared: The Material of Culture , 1988 .

[10]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Observational learning of tool-use by young chimpanzees , 1987 .

[11]  H. Kummer,et al.  Conditions of Innovative Behaviour in Primates , 1985 .

[12]  Manfred Milinski,et al.  Competitive resource sharing: An experimental test of a learning rule for ESSs , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  D. Kramer,et al.  Food and feeding behavior of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae) , 1981 .

[14]  Y. Sugita IMITATIVE CHOICE BEHAVIOR IN GUPPIES , 1980 .

[15]  B. Beck Animal Tool Behavior: The Use and Manufacture of Tools by Animals , 1980 .

[16]  W. Herrnkind,et al.  A quantitative analysis of social interaction of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata (pisces: Poeciliidae) as a function of population density , 1974 .

[17]  J. Goodall,et al.  Tool-Using and Aimed Throwing in a Community of Free-Living Chimpanzees , 1964, Nature.

[18]  A. Magurran,et al.  The Behavioral Diversity and Evolution of Guppy, Poecilia reticulata, Populations in Trinidad , 1995 .

[19]  Phyllis C. Lee Adaptations to environmental change: an evolutionary perspective , 1991 .

[20]  E. Visalberghi,et al.  Social processes affecting the appearance of innovative behaviors in capuchin monkeys. , 1990, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[21]  G. Katzir Relationships Between Social Structure and Response To Novelty in Captive Jackdaws, Corvus Monedula L. Ii. Response To Novel Palatable Food , 1982 .

[22]  R. Hinde,et al.  The Opening of Milk Bottles by Birds , 1952, Nature.