The role of ECG-gated MDCT in the evaluation of aortic and mitral mechanical valves: initial experience.

OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to evaluate the role of ECG-gated MDCT in the functional evaluation of mechanical prosthetic aortic and mitral valves. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty sequential patients with 23 mechanical prosthetic valves were evaluated with an ECG-gated 40- or 64-MDCT scanner. Multiplanar reformation, maximal-intensity-projection, volume-rendering, and volume-averaging techniques were used for visualization of valve leaflets in systole and diastole. The visibility of each mechanical valve was evaluated by consensus of a radiologist and a cardiologist using a subjective 5-point scale (0-4). MDCT findings were correlated with fluoroscopic opening and closing angle measurements and echocardiographic pressure gradient measurements in 11 and 19 valves, respectively. RESULTS The series included 18 bileaflet and five single-leaflet mechanical valves. The visibility score for the bileaflet mechanical valves was excellent (score of 4) in all 18 cases, but it was lower for single-leaflet valves (mean score, 2.8; range, 1-4) (p = 0.04). Bland-Altman plots showed high agreement between MDCT and fluoroscopy for measurements of opening and closing angles of bileaflet mechanical valves. In four patients, a stuck valve was seen on MDCT and was confirmed by fluoroscopy. Doppler echocardiography showed increased transvalvular pressure in two of the four patients with a stuck mitral valve and increased transaortic pressure in four patients with normal prosthetic aortic valve motion. CONCLUSION Our preliminary results suggest that MDCT is a promising technique for functional evaluation of bileaflet mechanical valves, allowing reliable measurements of opening and closing leaflet angles. However, the role of MDCT in the evaluation of single-leaflet valves might be limited.

[1]  A. Makaryus,et al.  Added value of CT in adult congenital heart disease , 2009 .

[2]  J. Sanz,et al.  Evaluation of cardiac valves using multidetector CT. , 2009, Cardiology clinics.

[3]  E. Kazerooni,et al.  Evaluation of mechanical heart valve size and function with ECG-gated 64-MDCT. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  M. Prokop,et al.  Comparison of multidetector-row computed tomography to echocardiography and fluoroscopy for evaluation of patients with mechanical prosthetic valve obstruction. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  S. Gündüz,et al.  Letter to the Editor re: Correctness of multi-detector-row computed tomography for diagnosing mechanical prosthetic heart valve disorders using operative findings as a gold standard , 2009, European Radiology.

[6]  E. Kazerooni,et al.  Hemodynamic and functional assessment of mechanical aortic valves using combined echocardiography and multidetector computed tomography. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[7]  W. Wood Multidetector CT: a new "window" adding to the echocardiographic assessment of prosthetic aortic valves? , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[8]  M. Ozkan,et al.  Role of MDCT in the evaluation of prosthetic heart valves. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  A. Sagie,et al.  Obstructive left-sided prosthetic valve thrombosis , 2009, Acute cardiac care.

[10]  Eiki Tayama,et al.  Leaflet movement of the ATS valve in the aortic position: unique behavior observed in 19-mm valves. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  R. Ronderos,et al.  Are all echocardiographic findings equally predictive for diagnosis in prosthetic endocarditis? , 2004, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[12]  H. Teshima,et al.  Usefulness of a multidetector-row computed tomography scanner for detecting pannus formation. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[13]  Mauro Pepi,et al.  Prosthetic Mitral Valve Thrombosis: Can Fluoroscopy Predict the Efficacy of Thrombolytic Treatment? , 2003, Circulation.

[14]  H. Akashi,et al.  Obstruction of St Jude Medical valves in the aortic position: histology and immunohistochemistry of pannus. , 2003, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[15]  H. Akashi,et al.  Obstruction of St Jude Medical valves in the aortic position: significance of a combination of cineradiography and echocardiography. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[16]  G. Santambrogio,et al.  Incorrect echocardiographic diagnosis in patients with mechanical prosthetic valve dysfunction: correlation with surgical findings. , 2000, The American journal of medicine.

[17]  G. Thiene,et al.  Reoperations for acute prosthetic thrombosis and pannus: an assessment of rates, relationship and risk. , 1999, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[18]  M. Quiñones,et al.  Differentiating thrombus from pannus formation in obstructed mechanical prosthetic valves: an evaluation of clinical, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiographic parameters. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  James G. Chandler,et al.  Radiographic detection of strut separations in Björk-Shiley convexo-concave mitral valves. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  R. Heethaar,et al.  Assessment of the opening angle of implanted Björk-Shiley prosthetic valves. , 1983, Circulation.

[21]  A. Bartorelli,et al.  Valve design characteristics and cine-fluoroscopic appearance of five currently available bileaflet prosthetic heart valves. , 1996, American journal of cardiac imaging.