Behavioral Change and Its Neural Correlates in Visual Agnosia After Expertise Training

Agnosia, the impairment in object and face recognition despite intact vision and intelligence, is one of the most intriguing and debilitating neuropsychological deficits. The goal of this study was to determine whether S.M., an individual with longstanding visual agnosia and concomitant prosopagnosia, can be retrained to perform visual object recognition and, if so, what neural substrates mediate this reacquisition. Additionally, of interest is the extent to which training on one type of visual stimulus generalizes to other visual stimuli, as this informs our understanding of the organization of ventral visual cortex. Greebles were chosen as the stimuli for retraining given that, in neurologically normal individuals, these stimuli can engage the fusiform face area. Posttraining, S.M. showed significant improvement in recognizing Greebles, although he did not attain normal levels of performance. He was also able to recognize untrained Greebles and showed improvement in recognizing common objects. Surprisingly, his performance on face recognition, albeit poor initially, was even more impaired following training. A comparison of preand postintervention functional neuroimaging data mirrored the behavioral findings: Face-selective voxels in the fusiform gyrus prior to training were no longer so and were, in fact, more Greeble-selective. The findings indicate potential for experience-dependent dynamic reorganization in agnosia with the possibility that residual neural tissue, with limited capacity, will compete for representations.

[1]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[2]  Wolfgang Grodd,et al.  Reorganization of Speech Production at the Motor Cortex and Cerebellum following Capsular Infarction: a Follow-up Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2002, Neurocase.

[3]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Impairments in part–whole representations of objects in two cases of integrative visual agnosia , 2007, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[4]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Individual differences in FFA activity suggest independent processing at different spatial scales , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[5]  Glyn W Humphreys,et al.  AGNOSIA WITHOUT PROSOPAGNOSIA OR ALEXIA: EVIDENCE FOR STORED VISUAL MEMORIES SPECIFIC TO OBJECTS. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[6]  M. Farah,et al.  EARLY COMMITMENT OF NEURAL SUBSTRATES FOR FACE RECOGNITION , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[7]  C. Price,et al.  Mechanisms of recovery from aphasia: evidence from positron emission tomography studies , 1999, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[8]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Krzysztof Laudanski,et al.  The cognitive impairments due to the occipito-parietal brain injury after gunshot: a successful neurorehabiliation case study , 2003, Brain injury.

[11]  Emiliano Ricciardi,et al.  Beyond sensory images: Object-based representation in the human ventral pathway. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Functional Plasticity in Ventral Temporal Cortex following Cognitive Rehabilitation of a Congenital Prosopagnosic , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  Rachel A Robbins,et al.  No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks , 2007, Cognition.

[14]  Steven L. Miller,et al.  Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: Evidence from functional MRI , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  M. Tarr,et al.  Learning to see faces and objects , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Visual Object Agnosia without Alexia or Prosopagnosia: Arguments for Separate Knowledge Stores , 1997 .

[17]  M. Tarr,et al.  FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Galia Avidan,et al.  Detailed Exploration of Face-related Processing in Congenital Prosopagnosia: 1. Behavioral Findings , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Douglas C. Noll,et al.  Different Neural Circuits Subserve Reading before and after Therapy for Acquired Dyslexia , 1998, Brain and Language.

[21]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Impact of learning on representation of parts and wholes in monkey inferotemporal cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  T. Robinson,et al.  Brain Plasticity and Behavior , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[23]  J. Riddoch,et al.  Birmingham object recognition battery , 1993 .

[24]  P. Maquet,et al.  Neural correlates of perceptual learning: A functional MRI study of visual texture discrimination , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Category-specific Agnosia , 2002, Neurocase.

[26]  M. Burns,et al.  Clinical Management of Agnosia , 2004, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[27]  Graham J Hole,et al.  I can't recognize your face but I can recognize its movement , 2007, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[28]  B. Duchaine,et al.  Visual Agnosia, 2nd Ed. , 2005 .

[29]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[30]  R. Seitz,et al.  Functional Neuroimaging in Stroke Recovery and Neurorehabilitation: Conceptual Issues and Perspectives , 2007, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[31]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  M. Farah Visual Agnosia: Disorders of Object Recognition and What They Tell Us about Normal Vision , 1990 .

[33]  N. Kanwisher Domain specificity in face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[35]  C. Genovese,et al.  A functional MRI study of face recognition in patients with prosopagnosia , 2001, Neuroreport.

[36]  J. Moake,et al.  This article has been cited by other articles , 2003 .

[37]  J. Keenan,et al.  Lesions of the fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia , 2002, Neurology.

[38]  L. Deouell,et al.  STRUCTURAL ENCODING AND IDENTIFICATION IN FACE PROCESSING: ERP EVIDENCE FOR SEPARATE MECHANISMS , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[39]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[40]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Just,et al.  Plasticity of language-related brain function during recovery from stroke. , 1999, Stroke.

[42]  Charles Wallis,et al.  Consciousness, context, and know-how , 2006, Synthese.

[43]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Categorizing the world: expert neurons look into key features , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  M. Seghier,et al.  A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[46]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[47]  Thomas Elbert,et al.  Reorganization of Human Cerebral Cortex: The Range of Changes Following Use and Injury , 2004, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[48]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[49]  M. Tarr,et al.  Training ‘greeble’ experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes , 1998, Vision Research.

[50]  M. Farah Is an Object an Object an Object? Cognitive and Neuropsychological Investigations of Domain Specificity in Visual Object Recognition , 1992 .

[51]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Neural correlates of recovery from aphasia after damage to left inferior frontal cortex , 2000, Neurology.

[52]  R. Kimchi,et al.  What does visual agnosia tell us about perceptual organization and its relationship to object perception? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  M. Tarr,et al.  Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Patterns of normal human brain plasticity after practice and their implications for neurorehabilitation. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[55]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Visual object agnosia without prosopagnosia or alexia: Evidence for hierarchical theories of visual recognition , 1994 .

[56]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Cognitive Neuropsychology: Patterns of Co-occurrence Among the Associative Agnosias: Implications for Visual Object Representation , 1991 .

[57]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Are Greebles like faces? Using the neuropsychological exception to test the rule , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[58]  Laurel J. Buxbaum,et al.  Impaired face and word recognition without object agnosiafn2 fn2 Supported by nih Grant R29DC03179-01 to the first author. , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[60]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Faces and objects in macaque cerebral cortex , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[61]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Congenital prosopagnosia: face-blind from birth , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[62]  A. Alavi,et al.  Recovery of vision after ischemic lesions: Positron emission tomography , 1987, Annals of neurology.

[63]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[64]  Volkmar Nicolas,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging mirrors recovery of visual perception after repetitive tachistoscopic stimulation in patients with partial cortical blindness , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[65]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Is the Fusiform Face Area Specialized for Faces, Individuation, or Expert Individuation? , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[66]  J. Sergent,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[67]  K. Grill-Spector The neural basis of object perception , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[68]  M. Tarr,et al.  Can Face Recognition Really be Dissociated from Object Recognition? , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[69]  Gaspare Galati,et al.  The Contribution of Functional Neuroimaging to Recovery After Brain Damage: A Review , 2001, Cortex.

[70]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Neurophysiology of shape processing , 1993, Image Vis. Comput..