The role of alternative prey in sustaining predator populations.

Generalist predators are widely acknowledged to contribute valuable levels of biological control in agroecosystems throughout the world. Although their feeding habits can result in the rejection of target pests in favor of preferred and often more nutritious non-pest prey, these natural enemies are capable of colonizing habitats prior to the arrival of pests by subsisting on alternative sources of food. The effect of consuming non-pest species on rates of pest predation by a generalist predator can be twofold; feeding upon these nutritious food items generally enhances fecundity thus improving their population growth, but the presence of alternative prey, especially during times when pest regulation is required, can result in reduced levels of pest consumption per individual predator. However, an increased density of natural enemies can counteract this reduction in pest consumption and exert significant levels of biological control. The role of alternative prey in sustaining predator populations has been widely reported in laboratory studies and field trials examining the fecundity, feeding behavior and growth rates of species subjected to diets of varying quality. Recently, the application of monoclonal antibody and molecular technology to study predation rates in the field has revealed the extent to which many predator communities rely on alternative prey before, during and after the immigration of pests into crops. In this study we examine the role of key species of alternative prey to generalist predators and discuss their impact in the context of biological control. The importance of these prey items to sustaining linyphiid spider and coccinellid communities will also be examined. Microsite sampling of arthropod populations in alfalfa indicated that the overlap in availability of pests (Acyrthosiphon pisum and Empoasca fabae) and alternative prey to linyphiid spiders is likely to reduce the ability of these generalist predators to restrict the growth of pest populations.

[1]  R. Fleming.  The potential for control of cereal rust by natural enemies , 1980 .

[2]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Biological Control in Theory and Practice , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[3]  P. Chiverton.  Predator density manipulation and its effects on populations of Rhopalosiphumpadi (Horn.: Aphididae) in spring barley , 1986 .

[4]  T. Bilde,et al.  Prey preference and egg production of the carabid beetle Agonum dorsale , 1994 .

[5]  S. Toft.  Value of the Aphid Rhopalosiphum padi as Food for Cereal Spiders , 1995 .

[6]  Arief Lukman Hakim,et al.  Managing Tropical Rice Pests Through Conservation of Generalist Natural Enemies and Alternative Prey , 1996 .

[7]  J. Axelsen,et al.  Pest control by a community of natural enemies. , 1997 .

[8]  T. Kring,et al.  Predaceous Coccinellidae in biological control. , 1998, Annual review of entomology.

[9]  T. Bilde,et al.  Quantifying food limitation of arthropod predators in the field , 1998, Oecologia.

[10]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Theoretical Approaches to Biological Control: The case for indigenous generalists in biological control , 1999 .

[11]  Bradford A. Hawkins,et al.  Theoretical Approaches to Biological Control , 2008 .

[12]  S. Toft,et al.  Nutrient composition of the prey's diet affects growth and survivorship of a generalist predator , 2001, Oecologia.

[13]  T. Bilde,et al.  The value of three cereal aphid species as food for a generalist predator , 2001 .

[14]  E. Evans,et al.  Larval Responses of Aphidophagous Lady Beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to Weevil Larvae Versus Aphids as Prey , 2001 .

[15]  J. Harwood,et al.  Living where the food is: web location by linyphiid spiders in relation to prey availability in winter wheat , 2001 .

[16]  M. Greenstone,et al.  Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents? , 2003, Annual review of entomology.

[17]  D. Pimentel.  Encyclopedia of Pest Management , 2002 .

[18]  J. Obrycki,et al.  Prey Suitability of Galerucella pusilla Eggs for Two Generalist Predators, Coleomegilla maculata and Chrysoperla carnea , 2002 .

[19]  J. Harwood,et al.  Web‐location by linyphiid spiders: prey‐specific aggregation and foraging strategies , 2003 .

[20]  J. Harwood,et al.  Collembola as alternative prey sustaining spiders in arable ecosystems: prey detection within predators using molecular markers , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[21]  M. Madsen,et al.  Microcosm studies on control of aphids by generalist arthropod predators: Effects of alternative prey , 2004, BioControl.

[22]  J. Harwood,et al.  Prey selection by linyphiid spiders: molecular tracking of the effects of alternative prey on rates of aphid consumption in the field , 2004, Molecular Ecology.

[23]  D. R. Richards,et al.  Using food for different purposes: female responses to prey in the predator Coccinella septempunctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) , 2004 .

[24]  W. E. Snyder,et al.  Predation of green peach aphids by generalist predators in the presence of alternative, Colorado potato beetle egg prey , 2004 .

[25]  Søren Toft,et al.  The quality of aphids as food for generalist predators: implications for natural control of aphids , 2005 .

[26]  William E. Snyder,et al.  Alternative prey disrupt biocontrol by a guild of generalist predators , 2005 .

[27]  J. Harwood,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies reveal the potential of the tetragnathid spider Pachygnatha degeeri (Araneae: Tetragnathidae) as an aphid predator. , 2005, Bulletin of entomological research.

[28]  S. Toft.  Acquired food aversion of a wolf spider to three cereal aphids: Intra- and interspecific effects , 1997, Entomophaga.