Detectability of pathological lesions in lumbar spine radiography

Thirty images with added simulated pathological lesions at two different dose levels (100% and 10% dose) were evaluated with the free-response forced error experiment by nine experienced radiologists. The simulated pathological lesions present in the images were classified according to four different parameters: the position within the lumbar spine, possibility to perform a symmetrical (left-right) comparison, the lesion contrast, and the complexity of the surrounding background where the lesion was situated. The detectability of each lesion was calculated as the fraction of radiologists who successfully detected the lesion before a false positive error was made. The influence of each of the four parameters on lesion detectability was investigated. The results of the study show that the influence of lesion contrast is the most important factor for detectability. Since the dose level had a limited effect on detectability, large dose savings can be made without reducing the detectability of pathological lesions in lumbar spine radiography.

[1]  David R. Dance,et al.  How do radiographic techniques affect mass lesion detection performance in digital mammography? , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[2]  E. Samei,et al.  Effects of Anatomical Structure on Signal Detection , 2000 .

[3]  John Yorkston,et al.  Relative impact of detector noise and anatomical structure on lung nodule detection , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[4]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Method of simulating dose reduction for digital radiographic systems. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[5]  E Samei,et al.  Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs. , 1999, Radiology.

[6]  Charles E. Metz.  Fundamental ROC Analysis , 2000 .

[7]  D. Chakraborty,et al.  Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment. , 1990, Radiology.

[8]  M Zankl,et al.  The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  Harold L. Kundel,et al.  Handbook of Medical Imaging, Volume 1. Physics and Psychophysics , 2000 .

[10]  Michael Sandborg,et al.  Comparison of two methods for evaluation of image quality of lumbar spine radiographs , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[11]  A. Burgess,et al.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. , 2001, Medical physics.

[12]  I. Cunningham.  Applied Linear-Systems Theory , 2000 .

[13]  Patrik Sund,et al.  Evaluation of lumbar spine images with added pathology , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[14]  F R Verdun,et al.  Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds. , 1999, Medical physics.

[15]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[16]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Simulation of nodule-like pathology in radiographs of the lumbar spine , 2000 .