Cost–benefit analysis for commissioning decisions in GEO 600

Gravitational wave (GW) interferometers are complex instruments, requiring years of commissioning to achieve the required sensitivities for the detection of GWs, of order lesssim10−21 in dimensionless detector strain, in the tens of Hz to several kHz frequency band. Investigations carried out by the GEO 600 detector characterization group have shown that detector characterization techniques are useful when planning for commissioning work. At the time of writing, GEO 600 is the only large scale laser interferometer currently in operation running with a high duty factor, $\sim 70\%$, limited chiefly by the time spent commissioning the detector. The number of observable GW sources scales as the product of the volume of space to which the detector is sensitive and the observation time, so the goal of commissioning is to improve the detector sensitivity with the least possible detector down-time. We demonstrate a method for increasing the number of sources observable by such a detector, by assessing the severity of non-astrophysical noise contaminations to efficiently guide commissioning. This method will be particularly useful in the early stages and during the initial science runs of the aLIGO and adVirgo detectors, as they are brought up to design performance.

[1]  J. Leong,et al.  Advanced techniques in GEO600 , 2014 .

[2]  R. Schnabel,et al.  First long-term application of squeezed states of light in a gravitational-wave observatory. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[3]  A. Parameswaran On aspects of gravitational-wave detection: Detector characterisation, data analysis and source modelling for ground-based detectors , 2007 .

[4]  M. M. Casey,et al.  The GEO-HF project , 2006 .

[5]  M. S. Shahriar,et al.  Methods and results of a search for gravitational waves associated with gamma-ray bursts using the GEO 600, LIGO, and Virgo detectors , 2014, 1405.1053.

[6]  David Blair,et al.  A gravitational wave observatory operating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit: Squeezed light in application , 2011, 1109.2295.

[7]  J. Rollins,et al.  Multimessenger Astronomy with Low-Latency Searches for Transient Gravitational Waves , 2011 .

[8]  P. Sutton A Rule of Thumb for the Detectability of Gravitational-Wave Bursts , 2013, 1304.0210.

[9]  J. R. Leong,et al.  A fixed false alarm probability figure of merit for gravitational wave detectors , 2014 .

[10]  Kentaro Somiya,et al.  Detector configuration of KAGRA–the Japanese cryogenic gravitational-wave detector , 2011, 1111.7185.

[11]  Hartmut Grote,et al.  The GEO 600 status , 2010 .

[12]  B. Schutz,et al.  First steps towards characterizing the hierarchical algorithm for curves and ridges pipeline , 2004 .

[13]  S. Chatterji,et al.  The search for gravitational wave bursts in data from the second LIGO science run , 2005 .

[14]  E. Regős,et al.  Casimir effect: running Newton constant or cosmological term , 2004, hep-th/0404185.

[15]  G.Mitselmakher,et al.  Coherent method for detection of gravitational wave bursts , 2008, 0802.3232.

[16]  M. Loupias,et al.  Virgo: a laser interferometer to detect gravitational waves , 2012 .

[17]  C. Caves Quantum Mechanical Noise in an Interferometer , 1981 .

[18]  Karsten Danzmann,et al.  The GEO 600 squeezed light source , 2010, 1004.4975.

[19]  P. Sundell,et al.  Biaxially symmetric solutions to 4D higher spin gravity , 2012, 1208.4077.

[20]  G. Mitselmakher,et al.  A coherent method for detection of gravitational wave bursts , 2004 .

[21]  K. Cannon,et al.  A method to estimate the significance of coincident gravitational-wave observations from compact binary coalescence , 2012, 1209.0718.

[22]  Joshua R. Smith,et al.  LIGO: the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory , 1992, Science.

[23]  Benno Willke,et al.  Advanced techniques in GEO 600 , 2014 .