Intact electrodermal skin conductance responses after bilateral amygdala damage

Several lines of evidence have suggested that the amygdala is a crucial component of the anatomical network that mediates the skin conductance orienting response (SCOR). In this study, the electrodermal activity of a patient whose entire amygdaloid complex had been destroyed bilaterally, and of 7 age- and gender-matched controls, was recorded under the same experimental conditions. The results indicate unequivocally that the subject could generate normal skin conductance and SCORs, in response to stimuli of different sensory modalities and configurations. This suggests that the amygdala is not a necessary component of the neural network underlying SCORs and that there are alternate neural units and pathways that link sensory cortices to autonomic effectors.

[1]  Karl H. Pribram,et al.  The GSR of monkeys during orienting and habituation and after ablation of the amygdala, hippocampus and inferotemporal cortex ☆ , 1965 .

[2]  A. Luria,et al.  Frontal lobes and the regulation of arousal processes , 1970 .

[3]  W. Surwillo,et al.  The influence of some psychological factors on latency of the galvanic skin reflex. , 1967, Psychophysiology.

[4]  P. Venables.  Some Problems and Controversies in the Psychophysiological Investigation of Schizophrenia , 1983 .

[5]  D. Amaral,et al.  An autoradiographic study of the projections of the central nucleus of the monkey amygdala , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  M. Eysenck,et al.  Attention and Arousal , 1982 .

[7]  G. V. Hoesen,et al.  Temporal neocortical afferent connections to the amygdala in the rhesus monkey , 1976, Brain Research.

[8]  R. B. Mefferd,et al.  Physiological responses to mild heteromodal sensory stimulation. , 1969, Psychophysiology.

[9]  P. Valleala,et al.  AMYGDALOID AFTERDISCHARGE AND GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE. , 1964, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  K. Pribram,et al.  Arousal, activation, and effort in the control of attention. , 1975, Psychological review.

[11]  I. Lieblich,et al.  Manipulation of contrast between differential GSR responses through the use of ordered tasks of information detection. , 1969, Psychophysiology.

[12]  W. Cowan,et al.  The efferent connections of the anterior hypothalamic area of the rat, cat and monkey , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  W. Wilson,et al.  The effects of amygdalectomy on locomotor activity in monkeys. , 1961, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[14]  G. V. Van Hoesen,et al.  Multimodal amnesic syndrome following bilateral temporal and basal forebrain damage. , 1985, Archives of neurology.

[15]  H. Damasio,et al.  A computed tomographic guide to the identification of cerebral vascular territories. , 1983, Archives of neurology.

[16]  K. Pribram,et al.  Chapter III – The Neuropsychology of Attention: Emotional and Motivational Controls , 1980 .

[17]  W. Cowan,et al.  The efferent connections of the ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus of the rat , , 1976, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[18]  A. Damasio,et al.  Knowledge without awareness: an autonomic index of facial recognition by prosopagnosics. , 1985, Science.

[19]  L. H. Miller,et al.  Differences among age and sex groups in electro-dermal conditioning. , 1968, Psychophysiology.

[20]  M H Bagshaw,et al.  Multiple measures of the orienting reaction and their dissociation after amygdalectomy in monkeys. , 1968, Experimental neurology.

[21]  J. Price,et al.  A description of the amygdaloid complex in the rat and cat with observations on intra‐amygdaloid axonal connections , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[22]  P. Venables,et al.  Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. , 1981 .

[23]  W. F. Prokasy,et al.  Electrodermal Activity in Psychological Research , 1973 .