A Review of In Silico Tools as Alternatives to Animal Testing: Principles, Resources and Applications

Across the spectrum of industrial sectors, including pharmaceuticals, chemicals, personal care products, food additives and their associated regulatory agencies, there is a need to develop robust and reliable methods to reduce or replace animal testing. It is generally recognised that no single alternative method will be able to provide a one-to-one replacement for assays based on more complex toxicological endpoints. Hence, information from a combination of techniques is required. A greater understanding of the time and concentration-dependent mechanisms, underlying the interactions between chemicals and biological systems, and the sequence of events that can lead to apical effects, will help to move forward the science of reducing and replacing animal experiments. In silico modelling, in vitro assays, high-throughput screening, organ-on-a-chip technology, omics and mathematical biology, can provide complementary information to develop a complete picture of the potential response of an organism to a chemical stressor. Adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) and systems biology frameworks enable relevant information from diverse sources to be logically integrated. While individual researchers do not need to be experts across all disciplines, it is useful to have a fundamental understanding of what other areas of science have to offer, and how knowledge can be integrated with other disciplines. The purpose of this review is to provide those who are unfamiliar with predictive in silico tools, with a fundamental understanding of the underlying theory. Current applications, software, barriers to acceptance, new developments and the use of integrated approaches are all discussed, with additional resources being signposted for each of the topics.

[1]  Prachi Pradeep,et al.  Estimating uncertainty in the context of new approach methodologies for potential use in chemical safety evaluation , 2019, Current Opinion in Toxicology.

[2]  Marin Georgiev,et al.  Automated and standardized workflows in the OECD QSAR Toolbox , 2019, Computational Toxicology.

[3]  U. Tillmann,et al.  A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. , 1997, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[4]  A. Stepan,et al.  Structural alert/reactive metabolite concept as applied in medicinal chemistry to mitigate the risk of idiosyncratic drug toxicity: a perspective based on the critical examination of trends in the top 200 drugs marketed in the United States. , 2011, Chemical research in toxicology.

[5]  Catherine Mahony,et al.  Case studies to test: A framework for using structural, reactivity, metabolic and physicochemical similarity to evaluate the suitability of analogs for SAR-based toxicological assessments. , 2011, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[6]  Judith C. Madden,et al.  Development and analysis of an adverse outcome pathway network for human neurotoxicity , 2019, Archives of Toxicology.

[7]  L Kuepfer,et al.  Applied Concepts in PBPK Modeling: How to Build a PBPK/PD Model , 2016, CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology.

[8]  A. Worth Computational modelling for the sustainable management of chemicals , 2020, Computational toxicology.

[9]  Judith C. Madden,et al.  Quantitative adverse outcome pathway (qAOP) models for toxicity prediction , 2020, Archives of Toxicology.

[10]  V. Chelliah,et al.  The promises of quantitative systems pharmacology modelling for drug development , 2016, Computational and structural biotechnology journal.

[11]  Eann A Patterson,et al.  A framework to establish credibility of computational models in biology. , 2017, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[12]  Bertrand Desprez,et al.  Finding synergies for the 3Rs - Repeated dose toxicity testing: Report from an EPAA partners' forum. , 2019, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[13]  Mark T. D. Cronin,et al.  How Does the Quality of Phospholipidosis Data Influence the Predictivity of Structural Alerts? , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[14]  J. Hermens,et al.  Classifying environmental pollutants , 1992 .

[15]  Petko Alov,et al.  Molecular Modelling Study of the PPARγ Receptor in Relation to the Mode of Action/Adverse Outcome Pathway Framework for Liver Steatosis , 2014, International journal of molecular sciences.

[16]  S D Dimitrov,et al.  QSAR Toolbox – workflow and major functionalities* , 2016, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[17]  J. C. Madden,et al.  Molecular fingerprint‐derived similarity measures for toxicological read‐across: Recommendations for optimal use , 2019, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[18]  Andrea-Nicole Richarz,et al.  Identification and description of the uncertainty, variability, bias and influence in quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for toxicity prediction. , 2019, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[19]  T W Schultz,et al.  A strategy for structuring and reporting a read-across prediction of toxicity. , 2015, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[20]  T. Bueters,et al.  Can quantitative pharmacology improve productivity in pharmaceutical research and development? , 2020, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[21]  Marlene Ågerstrand,et al.  CRED: Criteria for reporting and evaluating ecotoxicity data , 2016, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[22]  John M. Burke,et al.  Quantitative systems toxicology , 2017, Current opinion in toxicology.

[23]  Thomas E. Exner,et al.  Skin sensitization in silico protocol. , 2020, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[24]  Yu-Mei Tan,et al.  PBPK model reporting template for chemical risk assessment applications , 2020, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[25]  Wouter Fransman,et al.  Exposure Models for REACH and Occupational Safety and Health Regulations , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[26]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Demystifying Multitask Deep Neural Networks for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships , 2017, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[27]  F. Lombardo,et al.  Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[28]  R. M. Muir,et al.  Correlation of Biological Activity of Phenoxyacetic Acids with Hammett Substituent Constants and Partition Coefficients , 1962, Nature.

[29]  J. Schwöbel,et al.  Measurement and estimation of electrophilic reactivity for predictive toxicology. , 2011, Chemical reviews.

[30]  Corie A Ellison,et al.  Structural and functional pharmacokinetic analogs for physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model evaluation , 2018, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[31]  Romualdo Benigni,et al.  Structural Alerts of Mutagens and Carcinogens , 2006 .

[32]  Catherine Mahony,et al.  New ideas for non-animal approaches to predict repeated-dose systemic toxicity: Report from an EPAA Blue Sky Workshop. , 2020, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[33]  Emilio Benfenati,et al.  Integrating QSAR models predicting acute contact toxicity and mode of action profiling in honey bees (A. mellifera): Data curation using open source databases, performance testing and validation. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[34]  Steven J Enoch,et al.  Development of an in Silico Profiler for Mitochondrial Toxicity. , 2015, Chemical research in toxicology.

[35]  R. Benigni,et al.  In silico models for genotoxicity and drug regulation , 2020, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[36]  Russell O. Potts,et al.  Predicting Skin Permeability , 1992, Pharmaceutical Research.

[37]  M. Cronin,et al.  Relationship Between Adverse Outcome Pathways and Chemistry-Based in Silico Models to Predict Toxicity , 2017 .

[38]  M T D Cronin,et al.  Development of new structural alerts suitable for chemical category formation for assigning covalent and non-covalent mechanisms relevant to DNA binding. , 2012, Mutation research.

[39]  Maykel Cruz-Monteagudo,et al.  Activity cliffs in drug discovery: Dr Jekyll or Mr Hyde? , 2014, Drug discovery today.

[40]  Bas J Blaauboer,et al.  Considering new methodologies in strategies for safety assessment of foods and food ingredients. , 2016, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[41]  Karen Blackburn,et al.  A framework for using structural, reactivity, metabolic and physicochemical similarity to evaluate the suitability of analogs for SAR-based toxicological assessments. , 2010, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[42]  A. Minidis,et al.  Systematic Approach to Organizing Structural Alerts for Reactive Metabolite Formation from Potential Drugs. , 2018, Chemical research in toxicology.

[43]  Chanita Kuseva,et al.  Towards AOP application--implementation of an integrated approach to testing and assessment (IATA) into a pipeline tool for skin sensitization. , 2014, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[44]  M T D Cronin,et al.  A review of the electrophilic reaction chemistry involved in covalent DNA binding , 2010, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[45]  Paola Gramatica,et al.  QSAR classification models for the prediction of endocrine disrupting activity of brominated flame retardants. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.

[46]  Maria Vanina Martinez,et al.  QSAR Classification Models for Predicting the Activity of Inhibitors of Beta-Secretase (BACE1) Associated with Alzheimer’s Disease , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[47]  Helmut Segner,et al.  Data quality assessment for in silico methods: A survey of approaches and needs , 2010 .

[48]  Yu-Mei Tan,et al.  Challenges Associated With Applying Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for Public Health Decision-Making , 2018, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[49]  Gopal Pawar,et al.  In silico resources to assist in the development and evaluation of physiologically-based kinetic models , 2019, Computational Toxicology.

[50]  S. Enoch,et al.  Development of an In Silico Profiler for Respiratory Sensitisation , 2014, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[51]  Laura Uusitalo,et al.  An overview of methods to evaluate uncertainty of deterministic models in decision support , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[52]  Andrew Worth,et al.  Ab initio chemical safety assessment: A workflow based on exposure considerations and non-animal methods , 2017, Computational toxicology.

[53]  J. Dearden,et al.  QSAR modeling: where have you been? Where are you going to? , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[54]  Alicia Paini,et al.  Finding synergies for 3Rs – Toxicokinetics and read‐across: Report from an EPAA partners' Forum , 2018, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[55]  R. Tennant,et al.  Chemical structure, Salmonella mutagenicity and extent of carcinogenicity as indicators of genotoxic carcinogenesis among 222 chemicals tested in rodents by the U.S. NCI/NTP. , 1988, Mutation research.

[56]  Gopal Pawar,et al.  In Silico Toxicology Data Resources to Support Read-Across and (Q)SAR , 2019, Front. Pharmacol..

[57]  R A Ford,et al.  Estimation of toxic hazard--a decision tree approach. , 1978, Food and cosmetics toxicology.

[58]  Jie Shen,et al.  Toward Good Read-Across Practice (GRAP) , 2016 .

[59]  Maciej Stępnik,et al.  The SCCS notes of guidance for the testing of cosmetic ingredients and their safety evaluation - 10th revisionSCCS/1602/18 – Final version(ISSN : 1831-4767 ISBN : 978-92-76-00245-1 DOI : 10.2875/77673 Catalog Number : EW-AQ-19-012-EN-N) , 2019 .

[60]  R. Kroes Structure-Based Thresholds of Toxicological Concern (TTC): Guidance for Application to Substances Present at Low Levels in the Diet , 2004, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[61]  Paola Gramatica,et al.  Principles of QSAR models validation: internal and external , 2007 .

[62]  Reinhard Kreiling,et al.  Principles underpinning the use of new methodologies in the risk assessment of cosmetic ingredients , 2018, Computational Toxicology.

[63]  Alan Boobis,et al.  An evaluation framework for new approach methodologies (NAMs) for human health safety assessment. , 2020, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[64]  Shengde Wu,et al.  Application of structural and functional pharmacokinetic analogs for physiologically based pharmacokinetic model development and evaluation. , 2020, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[65]  Katarzyna R Przybylak,et al.  In silico models for drug-induced liver injury – current status , 2012, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[66]  Andrew Worth,et al.  Assessment of developmental neurotoxicity induced by chemical mixtures using an adverse outcome pathway concept , 2020, Environmental Health.

[67]  Hao Zhu,et al.  t4 report*: Toward Good Read-Across Practice (GRAP) Guidance , 2016, ALTEX.

[68]  U. Norinder,et al.  Computational approaches to the prediction of the blood-brain distribution. , 2002, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[69]  Read-Across Assessment Framework (RAAF) , 2017 .

[70]  M T D Cronin,et al.  Development of mechanism-based structural alerts for respiratory sensitization hazard identification. , 2012, Chemical research in toxicology.

[71]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  Open access in silico tools to predict the ADMET profiling of drug candidates , 2020, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[72]  K R Przybylak,et al.  Hepatotoxicity: A scheme for generating chemical categories for read-across, structural alerts and insights into mechanism(s) of action , 2013, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[73]  M T D Cronin,et al.  A review of the electrophilic reaction chemistry involved in covalent protein binding relevant to toxicity , 2011, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[74]  Ocspp,et al.  The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act , 2016 .

[75]  Katarzyna R Przybylak,et al.  In Silico Studies of the Relationship Between Chemical Structure and Drug Induced Phospholipidosis , 2011, Molecular informatics.

[76]  Mark T. D. Cronin,et al.  Computational Methods to Predict Toxicity , 2019, The History of Alternative Test Methods in Toxicology.

[77]  Uko Maran,et al.  Best Practices for QSAR Model Reporting: Physical and Chemical Properties, Ecotoxicity, Environmental Fate, Human Health, and Toxicokinetics Endpoints , 2018, Environmental health perspectives.

[78]  Mark T. D. Cronin,et al.  Assessing uncertainty in read-across: Questions to evaluate toxicity predictions based on knowledge gained from case studies , 2019, Computational Toxicology.