Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology

In observational studies with exposures or treatments that vary over time, standard approaches for adjustment of confounding are biased when there exist time-dependent confounders that are also affected by previous treatment. This paper introduces marginal structural models, a new class of causal models that allow for improved adjustment of confounding in those situations. The parameters of a marginal structural model can be consistently estimated using a new class of estimators, the inverse-probability-of-treatment weighted estimators.

[1]  D. Horvitz,et al.  A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement from a Finite Universe , 1952 .

[2]  P. J. Huber.  The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions , 1967 .

[3]  H. L. Le Roy,et al.  Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability; Vol. IV , 1969 .

[4]  R Neutra,et al.  Control of confounding in the assessment of medical technology. , 1980, International journal of epidemiology.

[5]  R Neutra,et al.  An analysis of detection bias and proposed corrections in the study of estrogens and endometrial cancer. , 1981, Journal of chronic diseases.

[6]  Rupert G. Miller,et al.  Survival Analysis , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[7]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[8]  P. Rosenbaum.  The Consequences of Adjustment for a Concomitant Variable that Has Been Affected by the Treatment , 1984 .

[9]  J. Robins.  A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect , 1986 .

[10]  J. Robins.  A graphical approach to the identification and estimation of causal parameters in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[11]  S Greenland,et al.  Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses. , 1987, American journal of epidemiology.

[12]  P. Rosenbaum.  Model-Based Direct Adjustment , 1987 .

[13]  J. Robins,et al.  Recovery of Information and Adjustment for Dependent Censoring Using Surrogate Markers , 1992 .

[14]  J. Robins,et al.  G-Estimation of the Effect of Prophylaxis Therapy for Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia on the Survival of AIDS Patients , 1992, Epidemiology.

[15]  Nicholas P. Jewell,et al.  AIDS epidemiology : methodological issues , 1993 .

[16]  J. Pearl.  Causal diagrams for empirical research , 1995 .

[17]  James M. Robins,et al.  Probabilistic evaluation of sequential plans from causal models with hidden variables , 1995, UAI.

[18]  J. Robins,et al.  G-estimation of causal effects: isolated systolic hypertension and cardiovascular death in the Framingham Heart Study. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  J M Robins,et al.  Correction for non-compliance in equivalence trials. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  J. Robins,et al.  Estimation of the Causal Effect of a Time-Varying Exposure on the Marginal Mean of a Repeated Binary Outcome , 1999 .

[21]  G. Shaw,et al.  Maternal pesticide exposure from multiple sources and selected congenital anomalies. , 1999 .

[22]  J. Pearl,et al.  Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[23]  James M. Robins,et al.  Marginal Structural Models versus Structural nested Models as Tools for Causal inference , 2000 .

[24]  D. Berry,et al.  Statistical models in epidemiology, the environment, and clinical trials , 2000 .

[25]  J. Robins,et al.  Marginal structural models to estimate the causal effect of zidovudine on the survival of HIV-positive men. , 2000, Epidemiology.