Optimal sizing for SAPIEN 3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with or without left ventricular outflow tract calcification.

AIMS The impact of left ventricular outflow tract calcification (LVOT-CA) on SAPIEN 3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement (S3-TAVR) is not well understood. The aims of the present study were to determine optimal device sizing for S3-TAVR in patients with or without LVOT-CA and to evaluate the influence of residual paravalvular leak (PVL) on survival after S3-TAVR in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS This study analysed 280 patients (LVOT-CA=144, no LVOT-CA=136) undergoing S3-TAVR. Optimal annular area sizing was defined as % annular area sizing related to lower rates of ≥mild PVL. Annular area sizing was determined as follows: (prosthesis area/CT annulus area-1)×100. Overall, ≥mild PVL was present in 25.7%. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for prediction of ≥mild PVL in patients with LVOT-CA showed that 7.2% annular area sizing was identified as the optimal threshold (area under the curve [AUC] 0.71). Conversely, annular area sizing for no LVOT-CA appeared unrelated to PVL (AUC 0.58). Aortic annular injury was seen in four patients (average 15.5% annular area oversizing), three of whom had LVOT-CA. Although there was no difference in one-year survival between patients with ≥mild PVL and without PVL (log-rank p=0.91), subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients with ≥moderate LVOT-CA who had ≥mild PVL had lower survival compared to patients with ≥mild PVL and none or mild LVOT-CA (log-rank p=0.010). CONCLUSIONS In the setting of LVOT-CA, an optimally sized S3 valve is required to reduce PVL and to increase survival following TAVR.

[1]  J. Leipsic,et al.  One-Year Clinical Outcomes With SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk and Inoperable Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis , 2016, Circulation.

[2]  L. Conradi,et al.  Device landing zone calcification and its impact on residual regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with different devices. , 2016, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[3]  D. Berman,et al.  Comparison of SAPIEN 3 and SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valve stent-frame expansion: evaluation using multi-slice computed tomography , 2016, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[4]  R. Lange,et al.  1-Year Outcomes With the Fully Repositionable and Retrievable Lotus Transcatheter Aortic Replacement Valve in 120 High-Risk Surgical Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Results of the REPRISE II Study. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[5]  G. Gerosa,et al.  Unravelling the (arte)fact of increased pacemaker rate with the Edwards SAPIEN 3 valve. , 2015, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[6]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Incidence and severity of paravalvular aortic regurgitation with multidetector computed tomography nominal area oversizing or undersizing after transcatheter heart valve replacement with the Sapien 3: a comparison with the Sapien XT. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[7]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Multicenter evaluation of a next-generation balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  D. Berman,et al.  A revised methodology for aortic-valvar complex calcium quantification for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. , 2014, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[9]  A. Einstein,et al.  Quantity and location of aortic valve complex calcification predicts severity and location of paravalvular regurgitation and frequency of post-dilation after balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[10]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Anatomical and Procedural Features Associated With Aortic Root Rupture During Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , 2013, Circulation.

[11]  M. Mack,et al.  Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. , 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[12]  S. Achenbach,et al.  SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). , 2012, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[13]  M. Mack,et al.  Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  G. Latsios,et al.  Correlation of Device landing zone calcification and acute procedural success in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantations with the self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.