MitraClip After Failed Surgical Mitral Valve Repair—An International Multicenter Study

Background Recurrence of mitral regurgitation (MR) after surgical mitral valve repair (SMVR) varies and may require reoperation. Redo mitral valve surgery can be technically challenging and is associated with increased risk of mortality and morbidity. We aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of MitraClip as a treatment strategy after failed SMVR and identify procedure modifications to overcome technical challenges. Methods and Results This international multicenter observational retrospective study collected information for all patients from 16 high‐volume hospitals who were treated with MitraClip after failed SMVR from October 29, 2009, until August 1, 2017. Data were anonymously collected. Technical and device success were recorded per modified Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. Overall, 104 consecutive patients were included. Median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 4.5% and median age was 73 years. At baseline, the majority of patients (82%) were in New York Heart Association class ≥III and MR was moderate or higher in 86% of patients. The cause of MR pre‐SMVR was degenerative in 50%, functional in 35%, mixed in 8%, and missing/unknown in 8% of patients. The median time between SMVR and MitraClip was 5.3 (1.9–9.7) years. Technical and device success were 90% and 89%, respectively. Additional/modified imaging was applied in 21% of cases. An MR reduction of ≥1 grade was achieved in 94% of patients and residual MR was moderate or less in 90% of patients. In‐hospital all‐cause mortality was 2%, and 86% of patients were in New York Heart Association class ≤II. Conclusions MitraClip is a safe and less invasive treatment option for patients with recurrent MR after failed SMVR. Additional/modified imaging may help overcome technical challenges during leaflet grasping.

[1]  O. Dekkers,et al.  Impact of recurrent mitral regurgitation after mitral valve repair for functional mitral regurgitation: long-term analysis of competing outcomes. , 2019, European heart journal.

[2]  T. Feldman,et al.  Continuous Direct Left Atrial Pressure: Intraprocedural Measurement Predicts Clinical Response Following MitraClip Therapy. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[3]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement for degenerated bioprostheses, failed annuloplasty rings, and mitral annular calcification , 2018, European heart journal.

[4]  M. Mack,et al.  Transcatheter Mitral‐Valve Repair in Patients with Heart Failure , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  R. Lederman,et al.  Long or redundant leaflet complicating transcatheter mitral valve replacement: Case vignettes that advocate for removal or reduction of the anterior mitral leaflet , 2018, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[6]  D. Maucort-Boulch,et al.  Percutaneous Repair or Medical Treatment for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  I. Palacios,et al.  1-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Mitral Annular Calcification. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  R. Hawkins,et al.  Contemporary outcomes in reoperative mitral valve surgery , 2017, Heart.

[9]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. , 2017, European heart journal.

[10]  H. Thiele,et al.  Percutaneous Edge-to-Edge Repair of Recurrent Severe Mitral Regurgitation After Surgical Mitral Valve Repair. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  L. Fleisher,et al.  2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  M. Neuss,et al.  Elevated Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient After MitraClip Implantation Deteriorates Long-Term Outcome in Patients With Severe Mitral Regurgitation and Severe Heart Failure. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[13]  M. Voskuil,et al.  Current MitraClip experience, safety and feasibility in the Netherlands , 2017, Netherlands Heart Journal.

[14]  B. Chang,et al.  Effect of Recurrent Mitral Regurgitation After Mitral Valve Repair in Patients With Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation. , 2017, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[15]  Emilia Bagiella,et al.  Two-Year Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  H. Schaff,et al.  Effect of Recurrent Mitral Regurgitation Following Degenerative Mitral Valve Repair: Long-Term Analysis of Competing Outcomes. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  G. Ailawadi,et al.  Adjunctive intracardiac echocardiography imaging from the left ventricle to guide percutaneous mitral valve repair with the mitraclip in patients with failed prior surgical rings , 2016, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[18]  M. Mack,et al.  Randomized Comparison of Percutaneous Repair and Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation: 5-Year Results of EVEREST II. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  R. Rajani,et al.  Factors influencing left ventricular outflow tract obstruction following a mitral valve‐in‐valve or valve‐in‐ring procedure, part 1 , 2015, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[20]  G. Filippatos,et al.  Clinical Trial Design Principles and Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair and Replacement: Part 2: Endpoint Definitions: A Consensus Document From the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  D. Capodanno,et al.  Percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system for severe mitral regurgitation in patients with surgical mitral valve repair failure. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  Timothy J Gardner,et al.  Mitral-valve repair versus replacement for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  J. Hausleiter,et al.  Percutaneous mitral valve interventions in the real world: early and 1-year results from the ACCESS-EU, a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized post-approval study of the MitraClip therapy in Europe. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  P. Boekstegers,et al.  Acute outcomes after MitraClip therapy in highly aged patients: results from the German TRAnscatheter Mitral valve Interventions (TRAMI) Registry. , 2013, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[25]  Susan Armstrong,et al.  Late Outcomes of Mitral Valve Repair for Mitral Regurgitation Due to Degenerative Disease , 2013, Circulation.

[26]  Jennifer Taylor,et al.  ESC/EACTS Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease. , 2012, European heart journal.

[27]  R. Smalling,et al.  Mitral valve repair with the MitraClip device after prior surgical mitral annuloplasty , 2010, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[28]  Willem Flameng,et al.  Recurrence of Mitral Valve Regurgitation After Mitral Valve Repair in Degenerative Valve Disease , 2003, Circulation.