Automated Fictional Ideation via Knowledge Base Manipulation

AbstractThe invention of fictional ideas (ideation) is often a central process in the creative production of artefacts such as poems, music and paintings, but has barely been studied in the computational creativity community. We present here a general approach to automated fictional ideation that works by manipulating facts specified in knowledge bases. More specifically, we specify a number of constructions which, by altering and combining facts from a knowledge base, result in the generation of fictions. Moreover, we present an instantiation of these constructions through the use of ConceptNet, a database of common sense knowledge. In order to evaluate the success of these constructions, we present a curation analysis that calculates the proportion of ideas which pass a typicality judgement. We further evaluate the output of this approach through a crowd-sourcing experiment in which participants were asked to rank ideas. We found a positive correlation between the participant’s rankings and a chaining inference technique that automatically assesses the value of the fictions generated through our approach. We believe that these results show that this approach constitutes a firm basis for automated fictional ideation with evaluative capacity.

[1]  Paul Sambre,et al.  Gilles Fauconnier & Mark Turner, " The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities" , 2002 .

[2]  Simon Colton,et al.  The Painting Fool: Stories from Building an Automated Painter , 2012 .

[3]  Anna Jordanous,et al.  A Standardised Procedure for Evaluating Creative Systems: Computational Creativity Evaluation Based on What it is to be Creative , 2012, Cognitive Computation.

[4]  Tony Veale,et al.  Tracking the Lexical Zeitgeist with WordNet and Wikipedia , 2006, ECAI.

[5]  Boyang Li,et al.  A Phone That Cures Your Flu: Generating Imaginary Gadgets in Fictions with Planning and Analogies , 2011, Intelligent Narrative Technologies.

[6]  Arvid Kappas,et al.  Applying a Text-Based Affective Dialogue System in Psychological Research: Case Studies on the Effects of System Behaviour, Interaction Context and Social Exclusion , 2014, Cognitive Computation.

[7]  Nada Lavrac,et al.  Baseline Methods for Automated Fictional Ideation , 2014, ICCC.

[8]  Jeffrey Dean,et al.  Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space , 2013, ICLR.

[9]  Henry Lieberman,et al.  A model of textual affect sensing using real-world knowledge , 2003, IUI '03.

[10]  Simon Colton,et al.  Full-FACE Poetry Generation , 2012, ICCC.

[11]  Finn Årup Nielsen,et al.  A New ANEW: Evaluation of a Word List for Sentiment Analysis in Microblogs , 2011, #MSM.

[12]  G. Fauconnier,et al.  The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind''s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books , 2002 .

[13]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Big Book of Concepts , 2002 .

[14]  Jeannette Schaeffer,et al.  Fictional vs. Factual Narration , 2013 .

[15]  Simon Colton,et al.  Towards the Automatic Generation of Fictional Ideas for Games , 2014 .

[16]  Oren Etzioni,et al.  Identifying Relations for Open Information Extraction , 2011, EMNLP.

[17]  James A. Tebbe Where Good Ideas Come From: The Natural History of Innovation , 2011 .

[18]  Graeme Ritchie,et al.  Some Empirical Criteria for Attributing Creativity to a Computer Program , 2007, Minds and Machines.

[19]  Simon Colton,et al.  Automating fictional ideation using ConceptNet , 2014 .

[20]  D. Hofstadter,et al.  Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid , 1979 .

[21]  Simon Colton,et al.  The FloWr Framework: Automated Flowchart Construction, Optimisation and Alteration for Creative Systems , 2014, ICCC.

[22]  S. Fienberg,et al.  The Clockwork Muse: The Predictability of Artistic Change. , 1991 .

[23]  Simon Colton,et al.  Computational Creativity: The Final Frontier? , 2012, ECAI.

[24]  Tony Veale,et al.  Transformative Character Arcs For Use in Compelling Stories , 2014, ICCC.

[25]  Jonathan Weese,et al.  UMBC_EBIQUITY-CORE: Semantic Textual Similarity Systems , 2013, *SEMEVAL.

[26]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[27]  Eduardo Reck Miranda,et al.  Enhancing Sound Design with Conceptual Blending of Sound Descriptors , 2004 .

[28]  Ashok K. Goel Biologically Inspired Design: A New Program for Computational Sustainability , 2013, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[29]  Hugo Liu,et al.  Commonsense Reasoning in and Over Natural Language , 2004, KES.

[30]  N. Roese,et al.  What Might Have Been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking , 1995 .

[31]  W. Wundt,et al.  Grundzüge der physiologischen psyhcologie , 1893 .

[32]  Francisco C. Pereira,et al.  The horse-bird creature generation experiment , 2003 .

[33]  Melanie Mitchell,et al.  The Copycat project: a model of mental fluidity and analogy-making , 1995 .

[34]  Colin Martindale The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic change. , 1991 .

[35]  S. Atkinson Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation , 2007 .

[36]  Brian Magerko,et al.  Employing Fuzzy Concept for Digital Improvisational Theatre , 2011, AIIDE.

[37]  Peter Kolb,et al.  DISCO: A Multilingual Database of Distributionally Similar Words , 2008 .

[38]  Bipin Indurkhya,et al.  Whence is creativity? , 2012, ICCC.

[39]  Finn Årup,et al.  A new ANEW: Evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis in microblogs , 2016 .

[40]  Ashwin Ram,et al.  The Role of Ontology in Creative Understanding , 1996 .