Revisiting Dosing Regimen Using Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Mathematical Modeling: Densification and Intensification of Combination Cancer Therapy

Controlling effects of drugs administered in combination is particularly challenging with a densified regimen because of life-threatening hematological toxicities. We have developed a mathematical model to optimize drug dosing regimens and to redesign the dose intensification–dose escalation process, using densified cycles of combined anticancer drugs. A generic mathematical model was developed to describe the main components of the real process, including pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy pharmacodynamics, and non-hematological toxicity risk. This model allowed for computing the distribution of the total drug amount of each drug in combination, for each escalation dose level, in order to minimize the average tumor mass for each cycle. This was achieved while complying with absolute neutrophil count clinical constraints and without exceeding a fixed risk of non-hematological dose-limiting toxicity. The innovative part of this work was the development of densifying and intensifying designs in a unified procedure. This model enabled us to determine the appropriate regimen in a pilot phase I/II study in metastatic breast patients for a 2-week-cycle treatment of docetaxel plus epirubicin doublet, and to propose a new dose-ranging process. In addition to the present application, this method can be further used to achieve optimization of any combination therapy, thus improving the efficacy versus toxicity balance of such a regimen.

[1]  A. Mukherjee,et al.  Personalising docetaxel and G-CSF schedules in cancer patients by a clinically validated computational model , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[2]  N. Munshi,et al.  A Phase II trial of high dose epirubicin in patients with advanced breast carcinoma , 2000, Cancer.

[3]  J. Schellens,et al.  Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics for Treatment Optimization in Clinical Oncology , 2008, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[4]  K. Friedrichs,et al.  Combination of taxanes and anthracyclines in first-line chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer: an interim report. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[5]  Mats O Karlsson,et al.  Model of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression with parameter consistency across drugs. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  P. Viens,et al.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of escalating dose of docetaxel administered with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in adult advanced solid tumors. , 2003, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[7]  Y. Rai,et al.  Neoadjuvant epirubicin/docetaxel (ET) concomitant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer with tumor diameter >=3.1 cm: results of the Kyushu ET therapy phase II trial. , 2012, Anticancer research.

[8]  Kok Lay Teo,et al.  Optimal Control of Drug Administration in Cancer Chemotherapy , 1993 .

[9]  Peter F Thall,et al.  Simultaneously optimizing dose and schedule of a new cytotoxic agent , 2007, Clinical trials.

[10]  M. Piccart,et al.  Phase I study of docetaxel administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion on a weekly basis. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  J. Manola,et al.  Docetaxel administered on a weekly basis for metastatic breast cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  J. Schellens,et al.  Moving towards dose individualization of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. , 2011, Cancer treatment reviews.

[13]  M. Zucchetti,et al.  Epidoxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer: a multicentric phase I-II study. , 2000, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[14]  J. Bergh,et al.  Model describing the relationship between pharmacokinetics and hematologic toxicity of the epirubicin-docetaxel regimen in breast cancer patients. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  S. Palmeri,et al.  Weekly docetaxel in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer , 2008, Therapeutics and clinical risk management.

[16]  J. Verweij,et al.  Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for the Individualization of Docetaxel Dosing: A Randomized Pharmacokinetic Study , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[17]  A Iliadis,et al.  New Adaptive Method for Phase I Trials in Oncology , 2008, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[18]  France Mentré,et al.  Modelling and Simulation in the Development and use of Anti-Cancer Agents: An Underused Tool? , 2004, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

[19]  D. Miles,et al.  High-dose epirubicin as primary chemotherapy in advanced breast carcinoma: a phase II study , 2004, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[20]  F. Cognetti,et al.  Identification of the highest dose of docetaxel associable with active doses of epirubicin. Results from a dose-finding study in advanced breast cancer patients. , 2001, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[21]  G. W. Swan Role of optimal control theory in cancer chemotherapy. , 1990, Mathematical biosciences.

[22]  E. Salminen,et al.  Epirubicin/docetaxel regimen in progressive breast cancer—a phase II study , 2002, Anti-cancer drugs.

[23]  D. Kerr,et al.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of taxotere (RP 56976) administered as a 24-hour infusion. , 1993, Cancer research.

[24]  J. Schellens,et al.  Bayesian Pharmacokinetically Guided Dosing of Paclitaxel in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[25]  Barbara L. Smith,et al.  Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  John D. Roberts,et al.  Phase I studies of weekly administration of cytotoxic agents: Implications of a mathematical model , 2003, Investigational New Drugs.

[27]  Dominique Barbolosi,et al.  Optimizing Drug Regimens in Cancer Chemotherapy by an Efficacy-Toxicity Mathematical Model , 2000, Comput. Biomed. Res..

[28]  Ivar Østby,et al.  Mathematical modeling of granulocyte reconstitution after high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support: effect of post-transplant G-CSF treatment. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  A. Milla-Santos,et al.  High-Dose Epirubicin Plus Docetaxel at Standard Dose With Lenograstim Support as First-line Therapy in Advanced Breast Cancer , 2001, American journal of clinical oncology.

[30]  M. Espié,et al.  High-dose sequential epirubicin and cyclophosphamide with peripheral blood stem cell support for advanced breast cancer: results of a phase II study , 2001, British Journal of Cancer.

[31]  A. Iliadis,et al.  An interface model for dosage adjustment connects hematotoxicity to pharmacokinetics , 2008, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

[32]  Brian R. Phillips,et al.  Real-time Dose Adjustment of Cyclophosphamide in a Preparative Regimen for Hematopoietic Cell Transplant: A Bayesian Pharmacokinetic Approach , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[33]  M. Pino,et al.  Epirubicin plus docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer: escalating dose does not improve efficacy. A phase II study. , 2004, Anticancer research.

[34]  T. Delozier,et al.  Epirubicin‐Docetaxel Combination in First‐Line Chemotherapy for Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: Final Results of a Dose‐Finding and Efficacy Study , 2001, American journal of clinical oncology.

[35]  P. R. Parthasarathy,et al.  On the cumulants of population size for the stochastic power law logistic model. , 1998, Theoretical population biology.

[36]  M. Ramos,et al.  Docetaxel plus epirubicin is a highly active, well-tolerated, first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: results of a large, multicentre phase II study , 2003, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[37]  Lewis B. Sheiner,et al.  A population pharmacokinetic model for docetaxel (Taxotere®): Model building and validation , 1996, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[38]  I. Bleiweiss,et al.  Neo-adjuvant therapy with dose-dense docetaxel plus short-term filgrastim rescue for locally advanced breast cancer , 2002, Anti-cancer drugs.

[39]  M. Piccart-Gebhart Mathematics and oncology: a match for life? , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[40]  K. Syrigos,et al.  Docetaxel and epirubicin supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor first-line in advanced breast cancer. , 2003, Anticancer research.

[41]  M. Marty,et al.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of Taxotere (RP 56976; NSC 628503) given as a short intravenous infusion. , 1993, Cancer research.

[42]  P. Vrignaud,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of epirubicin during repetitive courses of administration in Hodgkin's patients. , 1985, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[43]  R. Wierzbicki,et al.  Phase I-II study of high-dose epirubicin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[44]  Gisela Schwab,et al.  Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Pegfilgrastim in Healthy Subjects , 2006, Journal of clinical pharmacology.