Clinical and Product Features Associated with Outcome of DLBCL Patients to CD19-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy

Simple Summary Factors impacting the response to CAR T-cell therapies are not fully understood. In this monocentric prospective study, we describe the outcome of 60 patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and transformed follicular lymphoma infused with CD19-directed CAR T-cell products, axicabtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel. We obtained a 40% complete metabolic response and a 27% partial metabolic response with a median progression-free survival of 3.1 months and a median of overall survival of 12.3 months. We also found that age-adjusted IPI at the time of infusion, product features, in vivo expansion, and CAR T-cell exhaustion phenotype were significatively associated with the efficacy of the CAR T-cell therapy. Abstract CD19-directed CAR T-cells have been remarkably successful in treating patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and transformed follicular lymphoma (t-FL). In this cohort study, we treated 60 patients with axicabtagene ciloleucel or tisagenlecleucel. Complete and partial metabolic responses (CMR/PMR) were obtained in 40% and 23% of patients, respectively. After 6.9 months of median follow-up, median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) were estimated at 3.1 and 12.3 months, respectively. Statistical analyses revealed that CMR, PFS, and OS were all significantly associated with age-adjusted international prognostic index (aaIPI, p < 0.05). T-cell subset phenotypes in the apheresis product tended to correlate with PFS. Within the final product, increased percentages of both CD4 and CD8 CAR+ effector memory cells (p = 0.02 and 0.01) were significantly associated with CMR. Furthermore, higher CMR/PMR rates were observed in patients with a higher maximal in vivo expansion of CAR T-cells (p = 0.05) and lower expression of the LAG3 and Tim3 markers of exhaustion phenotype (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04). Thus, we find that aaIPI at the time of infusion, phenotype of the CAR T product, in vivo CAR T-cell expansion, and low levels of LAG3/Tim3 are associated with the efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in DLBCL patients.

[1]  R. Houot,et al.  FIRST RESULTS OF DLBCL PATIENTS TREATED WITH CAR‐T CELLS AND ENROLLED IN DESCAR‐T REGISTRY, A FRENCH REAL‐LIFE DATABASE FOR CAR‐T CELLS IN HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES , 2021, Hematological Oncology.

[2]  N. Kröger,et al.  Axicabtagene ciloleucel in vivo expansion and treatment outcome in aggressive B-cell lymphoma in a real-world setting. , 2021, Blood advances.

[3]  U. Sack,et al.  Advanced Flow Cytometry Assays for Immune Monitoring of CAR-T Cell Applications , 2021, Frontiers in Immunology.

[4]  A. Baruchel,et al.  [Eligibility of patients for CAR T-cell: Expert opinion-based collaborative work by the SFGM-TC]. , 2021, Bulletin du cancer.

[5]  D. Miklos,et al.  Immune reconstitution and infectious complications following axicabtagene ciloleucel therapy for large B-cell lymphoma. , 2021, Blood advances.

[6]  I. Yakoub-Agha,et al.  A real-time quantitative PCR targeting the viral vector for the monitoring of patients treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel. , 2020, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[7]  P. Merlet,et al.  Predictive factors of early progression after CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. , 2020, Blood advances.

[8]  D. Miklos,et al.  Tumor burden, inflammation, and product attributes determine outcomes of axicabtagene ciloleucel in large B-cell lymphoma. , 2020, Blood advances.

[9]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  Long-Term Follow-Up of Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy. , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Michael R. Green,et al.  Characteristics of anti-CD19 CAR T cell infusion products associated with efficacy and toxicity in patients with large B cell lymphomas , 2020, Nature Medicine.

[11]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Single-Cell Analyses Identify Brain Mural Cells Expressing CD19 as Potential Off-Tumor Targets for CAR-T Immunotherapies , 2020, Cell.

[12]  Michael L. Wang,et al.  Lisocabtagene maraleucel for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas (TRANSCEND NHL 001): a multicentre seamless design study , 2020, The Lancet.

[13]  I. Yakoub-Agha,et al.  Monitoring CAR T‐cells using flow cytometry , 2020, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[14]  R. Sékaly,et al.  Automated Manufacture of Autologous CD19 CAR-T Cells for Treatment of Non-hodgkin Lymphoma , 2020, Frontiers in Immunology.

[15]  G. Salles,et al.  Commercial anti‐CD19 CAR T cell therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive B cell lymphoma in a European center , 2020, American journal of hematology.

[16]  Matthew J. Frigault,et al.  Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in the Non-Trial Setting: Outcomes and Correlates of Response, Resistance, and Toxicity. , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  A. Maghnouj,et al.  Digital-Droplet PCR for Quantification of CD19-Directed CAR T-Cells , 2020, Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences.

[18]  J. Vose,et al.  Standard-of-Care Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Results From the US Lymphoma CAR T Consortium. , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  S. Steinberg,et al.  CD4/CD8 T-Cell Selection Affects Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Potency and Toxicity: Updated Results From a Phase I Anti-CD22 CAR T-Cell Trial. , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  J. Myklebust,et al.  Tuning the Antigen Density Requirement for CAR T Cell Activity. , 2020, Cancer discovery.

[21]  M. Kersten,et al.  Tisagenlecleucel cellular kinetics, dose, and immunogenicity in relation to clinical factors in relapsed/refractory DLBCL. , 2020, Blood advances.

[22]  N. Kröger,et al.  Digital PCR Assays for Precise Quantification of CD19-CAR-T Cells after Treatment with Axicabtagene Ciloleucel , 2020, Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development.

[23]  L. Sellner,et al.  Optimizing Manufacturing Protocols of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells for Improved Anticancer Immunotherapy , 2019, International journal of molecular sciences.

[24]  P. Riedell,et al.  Refining patient selection for CAR T-cell therapy in aggressive large B-cell lymphoma , 2019, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[25]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  c-Jun overexpression in CAR T cells induces exhaustion resistance , 2019, Nature.

[26]  H. Holte,et al.  Tisagenlecleucel in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients without measurable disease at infusion. , 2019, Blood advances.

[27]  I. Flinn,et al.  Long-term safety and activity of axicabtagene ciloleucel in refractory large B-cell lymphoma (ZUMA-1): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 1-2 trial. , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[28]  S. Grupp,et al.  ASTCT Consensus Grading for Cytokine Release Syndrome and Neurologic Toxicity Associated with Immune Effector Cells. , 2019, Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

[29]  I. Flinn,et al.  2-Year Follow-up and High-Risk Subset Analysis of Zuma-1, the Pivotal Study of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Axi-Cel) in Patients with Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma , 2018, Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

[30]  R. Levy,et al.  Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR T‐Cell Therapy in Refractory Large B‐Cell Lymphoma , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  J. Cerhan,et al.  Outcomes in refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results from the international SCHOLAR-1 study. , 2017, Blood.

[32]  Thomas Filleron,et al.  Impact of Expert Pathologic Review of Lymphoma Diagnosis: Study of Patients From the French Lymphopath Network. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  Yang Feng,et al.  Human CAR T cells with cell-intrinsic PD-1 checkpoint blockade resist tumor-mediated inhibition. , 2016, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[34]  J. Kochenderfer,et al.  Toxicities of chimeric antigen receptor T cells: recognition and management. , 2016, Blood.

[35]  Daniel Li,et al.  CD19 CAR-T cells of defined CD4+:CD8+ composition in adult B cell ALL patients. , 2016, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[36]  Brian Keith,et al.  Distinct Signaling of Coreceptors Regulates Specific Metabolism Pathways and Impacts Memory Development in CAR T Cells. , 2016, Immunity.

[37]  R. Kaplan,et al.  4-1BB Costimulation Ameliorates T Cell Exhaustion Induced by Tonic Signaling of Chimeric Antigen Receptors , 2015, Nature Medicine.

[38]  Bruce D Cheson,et al.  Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[39]  C. Creighton,et al.  Closely related T-memory stem cells correlate with in vivo expansion of CAR.CD19-T cells and are preserved by IL-7 and IL-15. , 2014, Blood.

[40]  A Orfao,et al.  EuroFlow antibody panels for standardized n-dimensional flow cytometric immunophenotyping of normal, reactive and malignant leukocytes , 2012, Leukemia.

[41]  Hao Liu,et al.  CD28 costimulation improves expansion and persistence of chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in lymphoma patients. , 2011, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[42]  W. Burns,et al.  Human effector CD8+ T cells derived from naive rather than memory subsets possess superior traits for adoptive immunotherapy. , 2011, Blood.

[43]  H. Gudmundsdottir,et al.  Dynamics and requirements of T cell clonal expansion in vivo at the single-cell level: effector function is linked to proliferative capacity. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[44]  G. Salles,et al.  Tisagenlecleucel in Adult Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B‐Cell Lymphoma , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.