Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND Laboratory studies have suggested that the sagittal displacements permitted by a knee replacement are influenced by the posterior slope of the tibial implant. The effect of the posterior slope of the tibial implant on the outcome of unicompartmental arthroplasty is not well known. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of the posterior slope on the long-term outcome of unicompartmental arthroplasty in knees with intact and deficient anterior cruciate ligaments. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the results of ninety-nine unicompartmental arthroplasties after a mean duration of follow-up of sixteen years. At the time of the arthroplasty, the anterior cruciate ligament was considered to be normal in fifty knees, damaged in thirty-one, and absent in eighteen. At the most recent follow-up, we measured the posterior tibial slope and the anterior tibial translation on standing lateral radiographs. The anteroposterior stability of seventy-seven knees that had not been revised by the time of the most recent follow-up was evaluated clinically. RESULTS In the group of seventy-seven knees that had not been revised by the time of the most recent follow-up, there was a significant linear relationship between anterior tibial translation (mean, 3.7 mm) and posterior tibial slope (mean, 4.3 degrees ) (p < 0.01). The mean posterior slope of the tibial implant was significantly less in the group of seventy-seven knees without loosening of the implant than it was in the group of seventeen knees with loosening of the implant (p < 0.05). Five ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament occurred in knees in which the ligament had been considered to be normal at the time of implantation; the posterior tibial slope in these five knees was > or = 13 degrees. Clinical evaluation revealed normal or nearly normal anteroposterior stability at the time of the most recent follow-up in all sixty-six unrevised knees in which the anterior cruciate ligament had been present at the time of implantation. Of the eighteen knees in which the anterior cruciate ligament had been absent at the time of the arthroplasty, eleven still had the implant in situ at the time of the most recent follow-up; the mean posterior tibial slope in these eleven knees was <5 degrees. Seven knees in which the anterior cruciate ligament had been absent at the time of the arthroplasty were revised. In these knees, the tibial prosthesis was implanted with a posterior slope of >8 degrees. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that >7 degrees of posterior slope of the tibial implant should be avoided, particularly if the anterior cruciate ligament is absent at the time of implantation. An intact anterior cruciate ligament, even when partly degenerated, was associated with the maintenance of normal anteroposterior stability of the knee for an average of sixteen years following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic study, Level II-1 (retrospective study). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[1]  L. Whiteside,et al.  The influence of joint line position on knee stability after condylar knee arthroplasty. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  J. Keller,et al.  Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Cadaver study of the importance of the anterior cruciate ligament. , 1985, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[3]  A. Lindstrand,et al.  Radiographic assessment of sagittal knee instability in weight bearing , 1993, Skeletal Radiology.

[4]  K. Markolf,et al.  In vitro stability of the implanted total condylar prosthesis. Effects of joint load and of sectioning the posterior cruciate ligament. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  R. Grelsamer Unicompartmental osteoarthrosis of the knee. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  B Noesberger,et al.  Stressradiography of the knee. Cruciate ligament function studied in 138 patients. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[7]  L. Whiteside,et al.  The effect of posterior tibial slope on knee stability after Ortholoc total knee arthroplasty. , 1988, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  F. Noyes,et al.  The strength of the anterior cruciate ligament in humans and Rhesus monkeys. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  P. Walker,et al.  Prediction of total knee motion using a three-dimensional computer-graphics model. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  J W Goodfellow,et al.  A radiographic study of bearing movement in unicompartmental Oxford knee replacements. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  J O'Connor,et al.  The anterior cruciate ligament in knee arthroplasty. A risk-factor with unconstrained meniscal prostheses. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  Niels O. Christensen Unicompartmental Prosthesis for Gonarthrosis A Nine‐Year Series of 575 Knees From a Swedish Hospital , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  P. Walker,et al.  Laxity and Function in Knee Replacements A Comparative Study of Three Prosthetic Designs , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  M. Bonnin,et al.  Tibial translation after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Two radiological tests compared. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[15]  W. Head,et al.  Soft-tissue balance and alignment in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  G. Deschamps,et al.  [Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament: a frequently unrecognized cause of failure of unicompartmental knee prostheses. Apropos of a series of 79 Lotus prostheses with a follow-up of more than 5 years]. , 1987, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.