Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern

After adaptation of the visual system to motion of a pattern in a particular direction, a static pattern appears to move in the opposite direction—the motion aftereffect (MAE). It is thought that the MAE is not accompanied by a shift in perceived spatial position of the pattern being viewed, providing psychophysical evidence for a dissociation of the neural processing of motion and position that complements anatomical and physiological evidence of functional specialization in primate and human visual cortex. However, here we measure the perceived orientation of a static windmill pattern after adaptation to rotary motion and find a gradual shift in orientation in the direction of the illusory rotation, though at a rate much lower than the apparent rotation speed. The orientation shift, which started to decline within a few seconds, could persist longer than the MAE, and disappeared when the MAE was nulled by physical motion of the windmill pattern. Our results indicate that the representation of the position of spatial pattern is dynamically updated by neurons involved in the analysis of motion.

[1]  H. Ridley Eye and Brain , 1973 .

[2]  R. L. Valois,et al.  Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors , 1991, Vision Research.

[3]  I. M. Spigel The Effects of Differential Post-Exposure Illumination on the Decay of a Movement After-Effect , 1960 .

[4]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  How parallel are the primate visual pathways? , 1993, Annual review of neuroscience.

[5]  S. Zeki,et al.  The Organization of Connections between Areas V5 and V1 in Macaque Monkey Visual Cortex , 1989, The European journal of neuroscience.

[6]  S. Zeki Functional organization of a visual area in the posterior bank of the superior temporal sulcus of the rhesus monkey , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  The Motion Aftereffect:A Modern Perspective , 1998 .

[8]  S. Zeki,et al.  The Organization of Connections between Areas V5 and V2 in Macaque Monkey Visual Cortex , 1989, The European journal of neuroscience.

[9]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Extrapolation or attention shift? , 1995, Nature.

[10]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Motion extrapolation in catching , 1994, Nature.

[11]  Richard L Gregory,et al.  The artful eye , 1995 .

[12]  DH Hubel,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  Stanley A. Klein,et al.  Extrapolation or attention shift? , 1995, Nature.

[14]  N. Mai,et al.  Selective disturbance of movement vision after bilateral brain damage. , 1983, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Biological image motion processing: A review , 1985, Vision Research.

[16]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Illusory Displacement of Equiluminous Kinetic Edges , 1990, Perception.

[17]  S. Zeki A vision of the brain , 1993 .