MRI‐based radiomics signature for tumor grading of rectal carcinoma using random forest model

The present study aimed to construct prospective models for tumor grading of rectal carcinoma by using magnetic resonance (MR)‐based radiomics features. A set of 118 patients with rectal carcinoma was analyzed. After imbalance‐adjustments of the data using Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE), the final data set was randomized into the training set and validation set at the ratio of 3:1. The radiomics features were captured from manually segmented lesion of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The most related radiomics features were selected using the random forest model by calculating the Gini importance of initial extracted characteristics. A random forest classifier model was constructed using the top important features. The classifier model performance was evaluated via receive operator characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC). A total of 1,131 radiomics features were extracted from segmented lesion. The top 50 most important features were selected to construct a random forest classifier model. The AUC values of grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 for training set were 0.918, 0.822, 0.775, and 1.000, respectively, and the corresponding AUC values for testing set were 0.717, 0.683, 0.690, and 0.827 separately. The developed feature selection method and machine learning‐based prediction models using radiomics features of MRI show a relatively acceptable performance in tumor grading of rectal carcinoma and could distinguish the tumor subjects from the healthy ones, which is important for the prognosis of cancer patients.

[1]  P. Lambin,et al.  Exploratory Study to Identify Radiomics Classifiers for Lung Cancer Histology , 2016, Front. Oncol..

[2]  C. Selvasekar,et al.  Current trends in staging rectal cancer. , 2011, World journal of gastroenterology.

[3]  Camel Tanougast,et al.  Extracted magnetic resonance texture features discriminate between phenotypes and are associated with overall survival in glioblastoma multiforme patients , 2016, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[4]  J. Borrás,et al.  Multidisciplinary Rectal Cancer Management: 2nd European Rectal Cancer Consensus Conference (EURECA-CC2). , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  L. Käser,et al.  [Colorectal carcinoma]. , 2005, Praxis.

[6]  S. Yun,et al.  Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: comparison of 3-T high-field MRI and endorectal sonography. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  P. Lambin,et al.  Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[8]  A. Mosig,et al.  Label-free classification of colon cancer grading using infrared spectral histopathology. , 2016, Faraday discussions.

[9]  Hyunjin Park,et al.  Classification of the glioma grading using radiomics analysis , 2018, PeerJ.

[10]  Olivier Gevaert,et al.  Non-small cell lung cancer: identifying prognostic imaging biomarkers by leveraging public gene expression microarray data--methods and preliminary results. , 2012, Radiology.

[11]  E. Negri,et al.  Oral contraceptives and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis , 2001, British Journal of Cancer.

[12]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[13]  F. Gaillard,et al.  MRI Grading versus Histology: Predicting Survival of World Health Organization Grade II–IV Astrocytomas , 2015, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[14]  C. Mathers,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012 , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[15]  H. Ueno,et al.  Histological Grading of Colorectal Cancer: A Simple and Objective Method , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[16]  Manuel Desco,et al.  Added value of advanced over conventional magnetic resonance imaging in grading gliomas and other primary brain tumors , 2014, Cancer Imaging.

[17]  M. Yi,et al.  Tumor location as a novel high risk parameter for stage II colorectal cancers , 2017, PloS one.

[18]  W. Willett,et al.  Dairy foods, calcium, and colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 10 cohort studies. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  W. Willett,et al.  Alcohol Intake and Colorectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of 8 Cohort Studies , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[20]  Andriy Fedorov,et al.  Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype. , 2017, Cancer research.

[21]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Deriving stable multi-parametric MRI radiomic signatures in the presence of inter-scanner variations: survival prediction of glioblastoma via imaging pattern analysis and machine learning techniques , 2018, Medical Imaging.

[22]  Koichi Nagata,et al.  Preoperative evaluation of colorectal cancer using CT colonography, MRI, and PET/CT. , 2014, World journal of gastroenterology.

[23]  R. Zaino,et al.  Colorectal carcinoma: Evaluation of histologic grade and factors influencing prognosis , 1982, Journal of surgical oncology.

[24]  R. Low,et al.  MRI of colorectal cancer , 2002, Abdominal Imaging.

[25]  Milan Sonka,et al.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[26]  P. Lambin,et al.  Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach , 2014, Nature Communications.

[27]  Luc Devroye,et al.  Consistency of Random Forests and Other Averaging Classifiers , 2008, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[28]  J. Wildberger,et al.  T-staging of rectal cancer: accuracy of 3.0 Tesla MRI compared with 1.5 Tesla , 2011, Abdominal Imaging.