Combining fMRI and MEG increases the reliability of presurgical language localization: A clinical study on the difference between and congruence of both modalities

To avoid neurological impairment during surgery near language-related eloquent brain areas, we performed presurgical functional brain mapping with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) in 172 patients using language tasks. For MEG localizations, we used either a moving equivalent-current dipole fit or a current-density reconstruction using a minimum variance beamformer with a spatial filter algorithm. We localized the Wernicke and Broca language areas for every patient. We integrated the results into a frameless stereotaxy system. To visualize the results in the navigation microscope during surgery, we superimposed the fMRI and MEG findings on the brain surface. MEG and fMRI results differed in 4% of cases, and in 19%, one modality showed activation but not the other. In the vicinity of large gliomas, the BOLD (blood oxygenation level-dependent) effect was suppressed in 53% of our patients. Of the 124 patients who had surgery, only 7 patients (5.6%) experienced a transient language deterioration, which resolved in all cases. We used MEG and fMRI to show different aspects of brain activity and to establish validation between MEG and fMRI. We conclude that measurement by both MEG and fMRI increases the degree of reliability of language area localization and that the combination of fMRI and MEG is useful for presurgical localization of language-related eloquent cortex.

[1]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  O Ganslandt,et al.  Functional neuronavigation and intraoperative MRI. , 2004, Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery.

[3]  S Thesen,et al.  Prospective acquisition correction for head motion with image‐based tracking for real‐time fMRI , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Peggy Gatignol,et al.  The role of dominant premotor cortex in language: a study using intraoperative functional mapping in awake patients , 2003, NeuroImage.

[5]  J A Maldjian,et al.  The effect of brain tumors on BOLD functional MR imaging activation in the adjacent motor cortex: implications for image-guided neurosurgery. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[6]  J A Maldjian,et al.  Decreased BOLD functional MR activation of the motor and sensory cortices adjacent to a glioblastoma multiforme: implications for image-guided neurosurgery. , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[7]  H J Reulen,et al.  [Tumor surgery of the speech cortex in local anesthesia. Neuropsychological and neurophysiological monitoring during operations in the dominant hemisphere]. , 1997, Der Nervenarzt.

[8]  Christopher Nimsky,et al.  Co-Registration of Function and Anatomy in Frameless Stereotaxy by Contour Fitting , 2003, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.

[9]  S. Petersen,et al.  Hemispheric Specialization in Human Dorsal Frontal Cortex and Medial Temporal Lobe for Verbal and Nonverbal Memory Encoding , 1998, Neuron.

[10]  G. Ojemann,et al.  Cortical language localization in left, dominant hemisphere. An electrical stimulation mapping investigation in 117 patients. , 1989, Journal of neurosurgery.

[11]  T. L. Davis,et al.  Language dominance determined by whole brain functional MRI in patients with brain lesions , 1999, Neurology.

[12]  J. M. Watson,et al.  Functional MRI reveals an interhemispheric dissociation of frontal and temporal language regions in a patient with focal epilepsy , 2003, Epilepsy & Behavior.

[13]  C. Nimsky,et al.  Observation of unaveraged giant MEG activity from language areas during speech tasks in patients harboring brain lesions very close to essential language areas: expression of brain plasticity in language processing networks? , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[14]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Segregating Semantic from Phonological Processes during Reading , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Alan Connelly,et al.  A Direct Test for Lateralization of Language Activation using fMRI: Comparison with Invasive Assessments in Children with Epilepsy , 2002, NeuroImage.

[16]  P. Grummich,et al.  Magnetic source imaging supports clinical decision making in glioma patients , 2004, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[17]  R J Wise,et al.  Separate neural subsystems within 'Wernicke's area'. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  J. A. Frost,et al.  Determination of language dominance using functional MRI , 1996, Neurology.

[19]  Mitchel S. Berger,et al.  Low grade gliomas: Functional mapping resection strategies, extent of resection, and outcome , 1997, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[20]  J. Sarvas Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Functional MRI during word generation, using conventional equipment , 1995, Neurology.

[22]  Manfried Hoke,et al.  Biomagnetism: Clinical Aspects , 1992 .

[23]  H Duffau,et al.  Long term reshaping of language, sensory, and motor maps after glioma resection: a new parameter to integrate in the surgical strategy , 2002, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[24]  G Zouridakis,et al.  Assessment of functional cerebral laterality for language using magnetoencephalography. , 1998, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[25]  J. B. Demb,et al.  Functional MRI measurement of language lateralization in Wada-tested patients. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  George Zouridakis,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic mapping of the language-specific cortex , 1999 .

[27]  K. Boulanouar,et al.  LANGUAGE FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF LANGUAGE AREAS :C ORRELATION WITH DIRECT , 2003 .

[28]  S. Bookheimer,et al.  15O water positron emission tomography in language localization: A study comparing positron emission tomography visual and computerized region of interest analysis with the wada test , 1999, Annals of neurology.

[29]  H. Duffau,et al.  Usefulness of intraoperative electrical subcortical mapping during surgery for low-grade gliomas located within eloquent brain regions: functional results in a consecutive series of 103 patients. , 2003, Journal of neurosurgery.

[30]  J Vieth,et al.  New approach to localize speech relevant brain areas and hemispheric dominance using spatially filtered magnetoencephalography , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[31]  R T Constable,et al.  Functional MRI of Language Processing: Dependence on Input Modality and Temporal Lobe Epilepsy , 2001, Epilepsia.

[32]  R. Hari,et al.  Dynamics of brain activation during picture naming , 1994, Nature.

[33]  T A Yousry,et al.  Preoperative activation and intraoperative stimulation of language-related areas in patients with glioma. , 1997, Neurosurgery.

[34]  J Hennig,et al.  The influence of gliomas and nonglial space-occupying lesions on blood-oxygen-level-dependent contrast enhancement. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[35]  D. Dinner,et al.  Aphasia after hemispherectomy in an adult with early onset epilepsy and hemiplegia. , 2004, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[36]  Oliver Ganslandt,et al.  Sensory Speech Area Investigated by Magnetoencephalography , 1994 .

[37]  J. Desmond,et al.  The role of left prefrontal cortex in language and memory. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Stéphane Lehéricy,et al.  Arteriovenous brain malformations: is functional MR imaging reliable for studying language reorganization in patients? Initial observations. , 2002, Radiology.

[39]  Mitchel S. Berger,et al.  Cortical localization of temporal lobe language sites in patients with gliomas. , 1994 .

[40]  D Le Bihan,et al.  Functional MR evaluation of temporal and frontal language dominance compared with the Wada test , 2000, Neurology.

[41]  Nick F Ramsey,et al.  Discrepant findings for Wada test and functional magnetic resonance imaging with regard to language function: use of electrocortical stimulation mapping to confirm results. Case report. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[42]  W. Penfield,et al.  Speech and Brain‐Mechanisms , 1960 .

[43]  Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  New insights into the anatomo-functional connectivity of the semantic system: a study using cortico-subcortical electrostimulations. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[44]  K Ugurbil,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of Broca's area during internal speech. , 1993, Neuroreport.

[45]  K. Boulanouar,et al.  Language Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Language Areas: Correlation with Direct Cortical Stimulation , 2003, Neurosurgery.

[46]  P. T. Fox,et al.  Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing , 1988, Nature.

[47]  S. Cappa,et al.  Phonemic and lexical errors in fluent aphasia: Correlation with lesion site , 1981, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  J Pile-Spellman,et al.  Interhemispheric transfer of language in patients with left frontal cerebral arteriovenous malformation , 2000, Neuropsychologia.