Some Models for the Multiway Contingency Table with a One-to-One Correspondence among Categories

Goodman (1985) discusses a class of models for the R X R contingency table with a one-to-one correspondence between the row and column variables. The most restrictive model in this class combines the features of symmetry and independence, and the least restrictive is the model of quasi symmetry or symmetric association. In this paper, I extend the class of models discussed by Goodman to the R X R X K (K 2 2) contingency table and to the R X R X R contingency table. Several of the models I discuss have been proposed by previous investigators, but many have not been previously considered. I show how to parameterize these models in new and informative ways, and I develop the relationship between the model parameters and various measures of dependence that are especially useful in tables of the type considered here. To illustrate the types of inferences and interpretations yielded by these models, I present two empirical examples.

[1]  Michael Hout,et al.  Association and Heterogeneity: Structural Models of Similarities and Differences , 1987 .

[2]  J. Darroch,et al.  Category Distinguishability and Observer Agreement , 1986 .

[3]  Michael E. Sobel,et al.  Exchange, Structure, and Symmetry in Occupational Mobility , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Martin A. Tanner,et al.  Modeling Agreement among Raters , 1985 .

[5]  J. Anderson Regression and Ordered Categorical Variables , 1984 .

[6]  Michael E. Sobel,et al.  Structural Mobility, Circulation Mobility and the Analysis of Occupational Mobility: A Conceptual Mismatch , 1983 .

[7]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Testing Marginal Homogeneity for Ordinal Categorical Variables , 1983 .

[8]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Association Models for Multi-Dimensional Cross-Classifications of Ordinal Variables , 1983 .

[9]  J. R. Bergan MEASURING OBSERVER AGREEMENT USING THE QUASI‐INDEPENDENCE CONCEPT , 1980 .

[10]  J. Nelder,et al.  The GLIM System Release 3. , 1979 .

[11]  O. D. Duncan How Destination Depends on Origin in the Occupational Mobility Table , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Clifford C. Clogg,et al.  Some latent structure models for the analysis of likert-type data , 1979 .

[13]  Peter McCullagh,et al.  A class of parametric models for the analysis of square contingency tables with ordered categories , 1978 .

[14]  N. Mantel,et al.  Marginal homogeneity, symmetry, and independence , 1978 .

[15]  S. Haberman,et al.  The analysis of frequency data , 1974 .

[16]  Leo A. Goodman,et al.  Some multiplicative models for the analysis of cross classified data , 1972 .

[17]  J. Fryer On the Homogeneity of the Marginal Distributions of a Multidimensional Contingency Table , 1971 .

[18]  S. Kullback,et al.  Marginal Homogeneity of Multidimensional Contingency Tables , 1971 .

[19]  P. Altham The Measurement of Association in a Contingency Table: Three Extensions of the Cross‐Ratios and Metrics Methods , 1970 .

[20]  S. Kullback,et al.  Symmetry and Marginal Homogeneity of an r×r Contingency Table , 1969 .

[21]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. , 1968 .

[22]  A. Madansky TESTS OF HOMOGENEITY FOR CORRELATED SAMPLES , 1963 .

[23]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[24]  A. Stuart A TEST FOR HOMOGENEITY OF THE MARGINAL DISTRIBUTIONS IN A TWO-WAY CLASSIFICATION , 1955 .