Assessment of Total Evacuation Systems for Tall Buildings

This report focuses on the use of egress models to assess the optimal strategy in the case of total evacuation in high-rise buildings. A model case study made of two identical twin towers linked with two sky-bridges at different heights has been simulated. The towers are 50 floor high-rise buildings including both vertical and horizontal egress components, namely stairs, occupant evacuation elevators (OEEs), service elevators, transfer floors and sky-bridges. The total evacuation of the single tower has been simulated employing seven possible strategies. The configuration of the egress components is depending on the evacuation strategy under consideration. The strategies include either the use of only one type of vertical egress components (stairs or elevators), or a combination of vertical components (stairs and elevators) or a combination of vertical and horizontal components (stairs, elevators, transfer floors, and sky-bridges). This report presents the general characteristics of the model case study, i.e. the layout of the building and the available egress components in relation to the strategy employed. The evacuation strategies have been simulated employing a continuous model (Pathfinder). In order to provide a cross validation of the results produced by Pathfinder, a fine network model (STEPS) has been employed to simulate the base case (only stairs available for the evacuation) and one scenario including the use of OEEs. The comparison between the models has been made employing specified calculations, i.e. the configuration of the inputs of the models is based on complete information about the model geometry, occupant characteristics, etc. Results show that the range of variability of the results between the two sub-models for stair and elevator modelling allows performing a relative comparison between the evacuation strategies. Differences are dependent on the modelling approaches and the sub-models for stairs and elevators employed by the models. The relative comparison between the strategies has been made using Pathfinder. Strategies involving the use of Occupant Evacuation Elevators (OEEs) are not effective if not linked to appropriate information to occupants about elevator usage, i.e. the accepted waiting time for elevators is lower than 10 minutes. The strategy employing only OEEs for the evacuation is the most efficient strategy. If occupants use sky-bridges to evacuate the building, evacuation times would be significantly lower than the strategies involving the use of stairs only or a combination of elevators and stairs without appropriate information to the evacuees. (Less)

[1]  D. L. Boswell,et al.  Pre-Warning Staff Delay: A Forgotten Component in ASET/RSET Calculations , 2011 .

[2]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  Representation of the Impact of Smoke on Agent Walking Speeds in Evacuation Models , 2013 .

[3]  Fahim Sadek,et al.  Final report on the collapse of the World Trade Center towers :: federal building and fire safety investigation of the World Trade Center disaster , 2005 .

[4]  Rita F. Fahy.  Overview of Major Studies on the Evacuation of World Trade Center Buildings 1 and 2 on 9/11 , 2013 .

[5]  Erica D. Kuligowski,et al.  A Review of Building Evacuation Models | NIST , 2005 .

[6]  Craig W. Reynolds.  Steering Behaviors For Autonomous Characters , 1999 .

[7]  Mingchun Luo,et al.  TOTAL BUILDING EVACUATION STRATEGY FOR HIGH RISE BUILDINGS , 2005 .

[8]  Brian J. Meacham,et al.  Guide for Evaluating the Predictive Capabilities of Computer Egress Models. | NIST , 2005 .

[9]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  The UK 9/11 evacuation study: Analysis of survivors’ recognition and response phase in WTC1 , 2010 .

[10]  R F. Fahy.  Enhancement of EXIT89 and Analysis of World Trade Center Data | NIST , 1996 .

[11]  Byung-In Kim,et al.  Estimating the impact of residents with disabilities on the evacuation in a high-rise building: A simulation study , 2012, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[12]  Mohamed A. Sheriff,et al.  Burj Dubai: an architectural technical design case study , 2007 .

[13]  Keith M. Christensen,et al.  Agent-Based Emergency Evacuation Simulation with Individuals with Disabilities in the Population , 2008, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[14]  D. A Purser,et al.  Quantification of behaviour for engineering design standards and escape time calculations , 2001 .

[15]  Erica D. Kuligowski,et al.  The faults with default , 2010 .

[16]  Walid Khier,et al.  CFD prediction of air flow past a full helicopter configuration , 2012 .

[17]  Wan Ki Chow,et al.  The skybridge as an evacuation option for tall buildings for highrise cities in the far east , 2005 .

[18]  Karen Boyce,et al.  Experimental studies to investigate merging behaviour in a staircase , 2012 .

[19]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  A review of the methodologies used in the computer simulation of evacuation from the built environment , 1999 .

[20]  Erica D. Kuligowski,et al.  Stairwell Evacuation from Buildings: What We Know We Don't Know , 2009 .

[21]  Guylène Proulx,et al.  Occupant Behavior and Evacuation During the Chicago Cook County Administration Building Fire , 2006 .

[22]  R. Waxweiler,et al.  Physical injuries and fatalities resulting from the Oklahoma City bombing. , 1996, JAMA.

[23]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  Fire evacuation in high-rise buildings: a review of human behaviour and modelling research , 2013 .

[24]  Cjh Cees Midden,et al.  Complex evacuation; effects of motivation level and slope of stairs on emergency egress time in a sports stadium , 1999 .

[25]  Dennis S. Mileti,et al.  Modeling Pre-Evacuation Delay by Occupants in World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2 on September 11, 2001 , 2009 .

[26]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  The UK WTC9/11 Evacuation Study: An Overview of the Methodologies Employed and Some Preliminary Analysis , 2010 .

[27]  Robyn R. M. Gershon,et al.  Modeling pre-evacuation delay by evacuees in World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2 on September 11, 2001 , 2011 .

[28]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  Evacuation modelling in road tunnel fires , 2012 .

[29]  S. Blake.  AN ANALYSIS OF HUMAN BEHAVIOUR DURING THE WTC DISASTER OF 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 BASED ON PUBLISHED SURVIVOR ACCOUNTS , 2004 .

[30]  C. W. Johnson,et al.  Lessons from the evacuation of the world trade centre, 9/11 2001 for the development of computer-based simulations , 2005, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[31]  E. Kuligowski.  Terror Defeated: Occupant Sensemaking, Decision-Making and Protective Action in the 2001 World Trade Center Disaster , 2011 .

[32]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  Modelling the Impact of Emergency Exit Signs in Tunnels , 2012 .

[33]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  An Experimental Evaluation of Movement Devices used to assist People with Reduced Mobility in High-Rise Building Evacuations , 2011 .

[34]  Rodrigo Machado Tavares,et al.  Evacuation Processes Versus Evacuation Models: “Quo Vadimus”? , 2009 .

[35]  Yoshifumi Ohmiya,et al.  Occupants' behaviour in response to the high-rise apartments fire in Hiroshima City , 1999 .

[36]  Michael Spearpoint,et al.  The effect of an ageing and less fit population on the ability of people to egress buildings , 2012 .

[37]  Karen Boyce,et al.  The Behaviour and Evacuation Experiences of WTC 9/11 Evacuees with self-designated mobility impairments , 2009 .

[38]  Michael Jon. Kinsey,et al.  Vertical transport evacuation modelling , 2011 .

[39]  G. W. H. Silcock,et al.  Toward the Characterization of Building Occupancies for Fire Safety Engineering: Capabilities of Disabled People Moving Horizontally and on an Incline , 1999 .

[40]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  Investigating the representation of merging behavior at the floor–stair interface in computer simulations of multi-floor building evacuations , 2008 .

[41]  Shen-Wen Chien,et al.  A Research of the Elevator Evacuation Performance and Strategies for Taipei 101 Financial Center , 2011 .

[42]  S. Gwynne,et al.  Employing the Hydraulic Model in Assessing Emergency Movement , 2016 .

[43]  Erica D. Kuligowski,et al.  Modeling the Evacuation of the World Trade Center Towers on September 11, 2001 , 2013 .

[44]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  Evacuation models of the future: Insights from an online survey on user’s experiences and needs , 2011 .

[45]  George R. Strakosch,et al.  The vertical transportation handbook , 1998 .

[46]  Erica D. Kuligowski,et al.  Recommendations for Elevator Messaging Strategies | NIST , 2012 .

[47]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  Approximating the evacuation of the World Trade Center North Tower using computer simulation , 2008 .

[48]  Raymond Friedman,et al.  An International Survey of Computer Models for Fire and Smoke , 1992 .

[49]  Mamoru Kohno,et al.  High-Rise Building Fires , 2007 .

[50]  G. W. H. Silcock,et al.  Toward the Characterization of Building Occupancies for Fire Safety Engineering: Capability of People with Disabilities to Read and Locate Exit Signs , 1999 .