Network Analysis Reveals Increased Integration during Emotional and Motivational Processing

In recent years, a large number of human studies have investigated large-scale network properties of the brain, typically during the resting state. A critical gap in the knowledge base concerns the understanding of network properties of a focused set of brain regions during task conditions engaging these regions. Although emotion and motivation recruit many brain regions, it is currently unknown how they affect network-level properties of inter-region interactions. In the present study, we sought to characterize network structure during “mini-states” engendered by emotional and motivational cues investigated in separate studies. To do so, we used graph-theoretic network analysis to probe network-, community-, and node-level properties of the trial-by-trial functional connectivity between regions of interest. We used methods that operate on weighted graphs that make use of the continuous information of connectivity strength. In both the emotion and motivation datasets, global efficiency increased and decomposability decreased. Thus, processing became less segregated with the context signaled by the cue (potential shock or potential reward). Our findings also revealed several important features of inter-community communication, including notable contributions of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, anterior insula, and thalamus during threat and of the caudate and nucleus accumbens during reward. Together, the results suggest that one way in which emotional and motivational processing affect brain responses is by enhancing signal communication between regions, especially between cortical and subcortical ones.

[1]  Luiz Pessoa,et al.  Impact of state anxiety on the interaction between threat monitoring and cognition , 2012, NeuroImage.

[2]  Luiz Pessoa,et al.  Reward Reduces Conflict by Enhancing Attentional Control and Biasing Visual Cortical Processing , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Functional Connectivity of the Striatum Links Motivation to Action Control in Humans , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Manfred G Kitzbichler,et al.  Cognitive Effort Drives Workspace Configuration of Human Brain Functional Networks , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  R. Cools,et al.  Striatal Dopamine and the Interface between Motivation and Cognition , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[6]  A. Schwarz,et al.  Negative edges and soft thresholding in complex network analysis of resting state functional connectivity data , 2011, NeuroImage.

[7]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Weight-conserving characterization of complex functional brain networks , 2011, NeuroImage.

[8]  D. Mobbs,et al.  Neural activity associated with monitoring the oscillating threat value of a tarantula , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[10]  W. M. Kelley,et al.  Human Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis Indexes Hypervigilant Threat Monitoring , 2010, Biological Psychiatry.

[11]  T. Braver,et al.  Motivated Cognitive Control: Reward Incentives Modulate Preparatory Neural Activity during Task-Switching , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[13]  Yong He,et al.  Graph-Based Network Analysis of Resting-State Functional MRI , 2010, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[14]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Embedding Reward Signals into Perception and Cognition , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[15]  Benjamin H. Good,et al.  Performance of modularity maximization in practical contexts. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  Wesley K. Thompson,et al.  MATLAB toolbox for functional connectivity , 2009, NeuroImage.

[17]  Luiz Pessoa,et al.  Segregating the significant from the mundane on a moment-to-moment basis via direct and indirect amygdala contributions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  F. Radicchi,et al.  Statistical significance of communities in networks. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Community detection in graphs , 2009, ArXiv.

[20]  L. Pessoa How do emotion and motivation direct executive control? , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  Gregory S. Berns,et al.  Neurobiological regret and rejoice functions for aversive outcomes , 2008, NeuroImage.

[23]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Efficiency and Cost of Economical Brain Functional Networks , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[24]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate , 2006 .

[25]  M. Paulus,et al.  An Insular View of Anxiety , 2006, Biological Psychiatry.

[26]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Resolution limit in community detection , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Richard J. Davidson,et al.  Brain Regions Associated with the Expression and Contextual Regulation of Anxiety in Primates , 2005, Biological Psychiatry.

[28]  Richard J. Davidson,et al.  Neural-Cardiac Coupling in Threat-Evoked Anxiety , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Measuring functional connectivity during distinct stages of a cognitive task , 2004, NeuroImage.

[30]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in very large networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[31]  Joydeep Ghosh,et al.  Cluster Ensembles --- A Knowledge Reuse Framework for Combining Multiple Partitions , 2002, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[32]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Human Amygdala Activation during Conditioned Fear Acquisition and Extinction: a Mixed-Trial fMRI Study , 1998, Neuron.

[34]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Brain Systems Mediating Aversive Conditioning: an Event-Related fMRI Study , 1998, Neuron.

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[36]  Mark S. Cohen,et al.  Parametric Analysis of fMRI Data Using Linear Systems Methods , 1997, NeuroImage.

[37]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[38]  D. Ruppert,et al.  A Note on Computing Robust Regression Estimates via Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares , 1988 .

[39]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[40]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology , 1984 .

[41]  W. Zachary,et al.  An Information Flow Model for Conflict and Fission in Small Groups , 1977, Journal of Anthropological Research.

[42]  S. Haber,et al.  The Reward Circuit: Linking Primate Anatomy and Human Imaging , 2010, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[43]  C. Grillon,et al.  Phasic vs Sustained Fear in Rats and Humans: Role of the Extended Amygdala in Fear vs Anxiety , 2010, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[44]  Padhraic Smyth,et al.  A Spectral Clustering Approach To Finding Communities in Graph , 2005, SDM.