SUPPORT Tools for Evidence-informed Policymaking in health 18: Planning monitoring and evaluation of policies

This article is part of a series written for people responsible for making decisions about health policies and programmes and for those who support these decision makers.The term monitoring is commonly used to describe the process of systematically collecting data to inform policymakers, managers and other stakeholders whether a new policy or programme is being implemented in accordance with their expectations. Indicators are used for monitoring purposes to judge, for example, if objectives are being achieved, or if allocated funds are being spent appropriately. Sometimes the term evaluation is used interchangeably with the term monitoring, but the former usually suggests a stronger focus on the achievement of results. When the term impact evaluation is used, this usually implies that there is a specific attempt to try to determine whether the observed changes in outcomes can be attributed to a particular policy or programme. In this article, we suggest four questions that can be used to guide the monitoring and evaluation of policy or programme options. These are: 1. Is monitoring necessary? 2. What should be measured? 3. Should an impact evaluation be conducted? 4. How should the impact evaluation be done?

[1]  S. Jaffar,et al.  A Cluster-Randomised Trial to Compare Home-Based with Health Facility-Based Antiretroviral Treatment in Uganda: Study Design and Baseline Findings , 2007, The open AIDS journal.

[2]  Irene Papanicolas,et al.  Performance measurement for health system improvement : experiences, challenges and prospects , 2010 .

[3]  Keith Mackay,et al.  How to Build M&E Systems to Support Better Government , 2007 .

[4]  J. Frenk.  Bridging the divide: global lessons from evidence-based health policy in Mexico , 2006, The Lancet.

[5]  Andrew D Oxman,et al.  SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 4: Using research evidence to clarify a problem , 2009, Health research policy and systems.

[6]  Felicia Marie Knaul,et al.  Comprehensive reform to improve health system performance in Mexico , 2006, The Lancet.

[7]  A. Harries,et al.  Monitoring the response to antiretroviral therapy in resource-poor settings: the Malawi model. , 2004, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

[8]  M Eccles,et al.  Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for evaluating guideline implementation strategies. , 2000, Family practice.

[9]  T. Palshof,et al.  Data from a national lung cancer registry contributes to improve outcome and quality of surgery: Danish results. , 2009, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[10]  J. Frenk.  [Bridging the divide: global lessons from evidence-based health policy in Mexico]. , 2007, Salud publica de Mexico.

[11]  Andrew D Oxman,et al.  SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 12: Finding and using research evidence about resource use and costs , 2009, Health research policy and systems.

[12]  Değerlendirme ve Sonuç,et al.  Glossary of Key Terms in Evaluation and Results-based Management in Sustainable Development (Second Edition) , 2023 .

[13]  W. Shadish,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .

[14]  A D Oxman,et al.  The unbearable lightness of healthcare policy making: a description of a process aimed at giving it some weight , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[15]  A. Oxman,et al.  Guide Support Tools for Evidence-informed Health Policymaking (stp) 17: Dealing with Insufficient Research Evidence Background , 2022 .

[16]  Claire Glenton,et al.  Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  A. Hutchinson,et al.  Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  C. Murray,et al.  Assessing the effect of the 2001–06 Mexican health reform: an interim report card , 2006, The Lancet.

[19]  Elizabeth J. Paulsen,et al.  Evidence-Informed Health Policy: Using Research to Make Health Systems Healthier , 2008 .

[20]  S. Jaffar,et al.  Integrating research into routine service delivery in an antiretroviral treatment programme: lessons learnt from a cluster randomized trial comparing strategies of HIV care in Jinja, Uganda , 2008, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[21]  Andrew D Oxman,et al.  SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) , 2009, Health research policy and systems.

[22]  J. Rivera,et al.  Impact of the Mexican program for education, health, and nutrition (Progresa) on rates of growth and anemia in infants and young children: a randomized effectiveness study. , 2004, JAMA.

[23]  A. Oxman,et al.  The Effects of Mandatory Prescribing of Thiazides for Newly Treated, Uncomplicated Hypertension: Interrupted Time-Series Analysis , 2007, PLoS medicine.