Changes in spinning anatomy and thread stickiness associated with the origin of orb-weaving spiders☆

The cribellum is an oval spinning field whose spigots produce silk fibrils that form the outer surfaces of the primitive prey capture threads found in aerial spider webs. A comparison of the cribella and cribellar capture threads of 13 species of spiders representing seven families (Amaurobiidae, Desidae, Dictynidae, Filistatidae, Neolanidae, Oecobiidae, and Uloboridae) confirms that the stickness of a cribellar thread is directly related to the number of spigots on a spider's cribellum. This comparison also demonstrates that the origin of orb-weaving spiders from ancestors that constructed less highly organized webs was associated with increases in both the weight-specific number of cribellum spigots and the weight-specific stickiness of cribellar prey capture threads. In contrast to other cribellate spiders, the number of cribellum spigots of orb-weaving species of the family Uloboridae scales to spider mass. Thus, the origin of orb-weaving spiders involved not only behavioural changes that stylized and restricted the placement of cribellar threads, but also included morphological changes that increased the stickiness of these capture threads by endowing them with more cribellar fibrils.

[1]  R. Forster,et al.  The spiders of New Zealand part 4. Agelenidae, Stiphidiidae, Amphinectidae. Amaurobiidae, Neolanidae, Ctenidae. Psechridae , 1973 .

[2]  W. Eberhard,et al.  Factors affecting numbers and kinds of prey caught in artificial spider webs, with considerations of how orb webs trap prey , 1980 .

[3]  N. Platnick,et al.  Towards a Phylogeny of Entelegyne Spiders (Araneae, Araneomorphae, Entelegynae) , 1999 .

[4]  J. Coddington,et al.  Web Manipulation and Two Stereotyped Attack Behaviors in the Ogre-Faced Spider Deinopis Spinosus Marx (Araneae, Deinopidae) , 1987 .

[5]  J. Coddington ORB WEBS IN “NON‐ORB WEAVING” OGRE‐FACED SPIDERS (ARANEAE: DINOPIDAE): A QUESTION OF GENEALOGY , 1986, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[6]  H. W. Levi,et al.  Systematics and Evolution of Spiders (Araneae) , 1991 .

[7]  Wayne P. Maddison,et al.  Macclade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution/Version 3 , 1992 .

[8]  B. Opell What Forces Are Responsible for the Stickiness of Spider Cribellar Threads , 1993 .

[9]  B. Opell Factors governing the stickiness of cribellar prey capture threads in the spider family Uloboridae , 1994, Journal of morphology.

[10]  B. Opell,et al.  Redesigning spider webs: Stickiness, capture area and the evolution of modern orb-webs , 1999 .

[11]  C. Craig,et al.  The ecological and evolutionary interdependence between web architecture and web silk spun by orb web weaving spiders , 1987 .

[12]  B. Opell Ontogenetic changes in cribellum spigot number and cribellar prey capture thread stickiness in the spider family Uloboridae , 1995, Journal of morphology.

[13]  Mark W. Denny,et al.  THE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SPIDER'S SILK AND THEIR ROLE IN THE DESIGN OF ORB-WEBS , 1976 .

[14]  B. Opell,et al.  Economics of spider orb-webs: the benefits of producing adhesive capture thread and of recycling silk , 1998 .

[15]  W. Eberhard,et al.  BEHAVIORAL CHARACTERS FOR THE HIGHER CLASSIFICATION OF ORB‐WEAVING SPIDERS , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  William G. Eberhard,et al.  Function and Phylogeny of Spider Webs , 1990 .

[17]  A. D. Blest,et al.  The spiders of New Zealand , 1967 .

[18]  J. Coddington Ontogeny and Homology in the Male Palpus of Orb Weaving Spiders and their Relatives, with Comments on Phylogeny (Araneoclada: Araneoidea, Deinopoidea) , 1990 .

[19]  R. Huey,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC STUDIES OF COADAPTATION: PREFERRED TEMPERATURES VERSUS OPTIMAL PERFORMANCE TEMPERATURES OF LIZARDS , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  J. Coddington Cladistics and Spider Classification: Araneomorph Phylogeny and the Monophyly of Orbweavers (Araneae: Araneomorphae, Orbiculariae) , 1991 .

[21]  J. Coddington The Monophyletic Origin of the Orb Web , 1986 .

[22]  B. Opell,et al.  Functional Similarities of Spider Webs with Diverse Architectures , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[23]  B. Opell,et al.  The material cost and stickiness of capture threads and the evolution of orb‐weaving spiders , 1997 .

[24]  D. Penny The comparative method in evolutionary biology , 1992 .

[25]  Hans M. Peters,et al.  Fine Structure and Function of Capture Threads , 1987 .

[26]  J. Bond,et al.  TESTING ADAPTIVE RADIATION AND KEY INNOVATION HYPOTHESES IN SPIDERS , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  B. Opell Increased stickiness of prey capture threads accompanying web reduction in the spider family Uloboridae , 1994 .

[28]  W. Eberhard,et al.  ULTRASTRUCTURE OF CRIBELLATE SILK OF NINE SPECIES I N EIGHT FAMILIES AND POSSIBLE TAXONOMIC IMPLICATION S (ARANEAE : AMAUROBIIDAE, DEINOPIDAE, DESIDAE , DICTYNIDAE, FILISTATIDAE, HYPOCHILIDAE, STIPHIDIIDAE, TENGELLIDAE) , 1993 .

[29]  J. Coddington,et al.  Phylogeny of the orb-web building spiders (Araneae, Orbiculariae: Deinopoidea, Araneoidea) , 1998 .