TOPSIS and VIKOR methods in study of sustainable development in the EU countries

Abstract Sustainable development is one of the most important problems under interest of scientists and organisations related to study development of countries in the world. Various groups (agendas) are established to develop the plan for sustainable development (e.g. SDGs- UN). To harmonize activities, particular goals and measurement indicators are defined. Each initiative in this respect is valuable and brings benefits to operability of sustainable development concept. Therefore the authors take up the attempt to apply TOPSIS and VIKOR methods to study sustainable development, by using selected indices out from objectives defined by SDGs. The results may be applied as the recommendation for proper method selection in the similar studies.

[1]  Przemyslaw Kazienko,et al.  Fuzzy multi-objective modeling of effectiveness and user experience in online advertising , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[2]  Martin O'Connor,et al.  Sustainable development : Concepts, rationalities and strategies , 1998 .

[3]  Mohammad Izadikhah,et al.  Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[4]  Shahzad Faizi,et al.  Group Decision-Making for Hesitant Fuzzy Sets Based on Characteristic Objects Method , 2017, Symmetry.

[5]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Jarosław Wątróbski,et al.  Using the PROSA Method in Offshore Wind Farm Location Problems , 2017 .

[7]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[8]  S. MacFeely Measuring the Sustainable Development Goals: What does it mean for Ireland? , 2017 .

[9]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[10]  D. Blanc Towards Integration at Last?: The Sustainable Development Goals as a Network of Targets , 2015 .

[11]  M. Fleurbaey On sustainability and social welfare , 2015 .

[12]  R. Costanza,et al.  Development: Time to leave GDP behind , 2014, Nature.

[13]  Tuuli Hirvilammi,et al.  Wellbeing and Sustainability: A Relational Approach , 2015 .

[14]  Brent Bleys The Regional Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare for Flanders, Belgium , 2013 .

[15]  Kostas Kolomvatsos,et al.  Fuzzy Modeling of User Behaviors and Virtual Goods Purchases in Social Networking Platforms , 2016, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[16]  Analysis of key indicators of economic dimensions of spas' sustainable development in Serbia as tourism destinations. , 2015 .

[17]  Chunshan Zhou,et al.  Estimation of eco-efficiency and its influencing factors in Guangdong province based on Super-SBM and panel regression models , 2018 .

[18]  Mojtaba Aghajani,et al.  Pollution Levels in Iranian Economy Sectors Using Input-output Analysis and TOPSIS Technique: An Approach to Sustainable Development☆ , 2014 .

[19]  B. Vira,et al.  Poorer without It? The Neglected Role of the Natural Environment in Poverty and Wellbeing , 2018 .

[20]  A. Verbruggen,et al.  Sustainability assessment and indicators: Tools in a decision-making strategy for sustainable development , 2014 .

[21]  Jarosław Wątróbski,et al.  Green Energy for a Green City—A Multi-Perspective Model Approach , 2016 .

[22]  Kimia Moazeni Assessment of urban welfare to achieve sustainable urban development using an integrated Fuzzy AHP-VIKOR with a case study , 2014 .

[23]  Mohammad Izadikhah,et al.  An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[24]  R. Hastie Problems for judgment and decision making. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.