Assessing the environmental impact of two options for small-scale wastewater treatment: comparing a reedbed and an aerated biological filter using a life cycle approach

Different options for wastewater treatment have different performance characteristics and also different direct impacts on the environment. These impacts occur over the whole life cycle of the treatment system. Natural wastewater systems such as the reedbed may offer reduced whole life cycle environmental impacts compared to systems with more technical and material sophistication. This paper describes a study of the life cycle impacts of two options for small-scale wastewater treatment which are a horizontal flow reedbed system and a package bio-filtration plant. The study is limited to impacts during the construction and operation phases. Energy use, CO2 emission and solid emissions were chosen as the environmental aspects. It was found that overall the reedbed and conventional systems were quite similar in terms of life cycle energy use. Transport occurring during construction and operational maintenance was a key contributor to energy use and CO2 emissions. The environmental impact of the reedbed reduced if the soil excavated on site was suitable for re-use in the infill. The effect on the results of the different assumptions made during the study was checked using sensitivity analysis. This analysis also helped us to identify recommendations for reducing the life cycle impact of the reedbed system.

[1]  R Otterpohl,et al.  Developing a model based decision support tool for the identification of sustainable treatment options for domestic wastewater. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[2]  M. Lundin,et al.  A life cycle assessment based procedure for development of environmental sustainability indicators for urban water systems , 2002 .

[3]  John N. Lester,et al.  The Life-Cycle Analysis of Small-Scale Sewage-Treatment Processes , 1995 .

[4]  P. Cooper,et al.  Reed bed treatment systems for sewage treatment in the United Kingdom - the first 10 years’ experience , 1995 .

[5]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Life cycle assessment: Comparing strategic options for the mains infrastructure — Part I , 1999 .

[6]  H. J. Bavor,et al.  Challenges for the development of advanced constructed wetlands technology , 1995 .

[7]  A. Tillman,et al.  Life cycle assessment of municipal waste water systems , 1998 .

[8]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Assessing Management Options for Wastewater Treatment Works in the Context of Life Cycle Assessment. , 1998 .

[9]  Constructed wetlands and nature conservation , 1997 .

[10]  A. R. Mels,et al.  Sustainability criteria as a tool in the development of new sewage treatment methods , 1998 .

[11]  P. J. Roeleveld,et al.  Sustainability of municipal wastewater treatment , 1997 .

[12]  R. Shutes Artificial wetlands and water quality improvement. , 2001, Environment international.

[13]  S. Molander,et al.  Life cycle assessment of wastewater systems : Influence of system boundaries and scale on calculated environmental loads , 2000 .

[14]  Gaterell,et al.  Establishing the true costs and benefits of environmental protection and enhancement in the aquatic environment , 2000, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  Hans Brix,et al.  How ‘green’ are aquaculture, constructed wetlands and conventional wastewater treatment systems? , 1999 .

[16]  Patrick Rousseaux,et al.  An LCA of alternative wastewater sludge treatment scenarios , 2002 .

[17]  John Davies,et al.  Assessment of the sustainability of alternatives for the disposal of domestic sanitary waste , 1999 .