Leveraging Processing to Understand Linguistic Cues, Power and Persuasion

In a persuasion context, how something is said can influence perceptions of power and subsequent information processing just as much as what is said. Here we focus predominantly on the ways in which various linguistic cues and styles (e.g. rhetorical questions, linguistic extremity) can impact persuasion attempts. Using common dual- and multi-process models as a guide, we examine how linguistic cues and the associated power dynamic serve multiple roles in a persuasion context. Taken together, the role and resultant information processing determine the durability of attitudes formed in the persuasion context. Taking each linguistic variable in turn, there are clear indicators that linguistic cues also convey information about power dynamics. This information about the relative power between source and audience also influences information processing and attitude strength. By leveraging information-processing models it is possible to discuss implications for attitude strength, confidence and durability. As a result of these processes, linguistic cues provide a mechanism by which power dynamics are both revealed and reified. Finally, while most research has focused on the impact of persuasion on attitudes towards a wide variety of topics, we propose that using particular linguistic cues can influence not only attitudes toward messages, but also attitudes toward people.

[1]  Lawrence A. Hosman,et al.  Powerful and Powerless Language Forms , 2006 .

[2]  Traci Y. Craig,et al.  Language Use and Persuasion: Multiple Roles for Linguistic Styles , 2011 .

[3]  H. Kelley,et al.  The social psychology of groups , 1960 .

[4]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Personal involvement as a determinant of argument based persuasion , 1981 .

[5]  R. Petty,et al.  When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of source credibility on persuasion , 2006 .

[6]  Charles S. Areni,et al.  An investigation of the effects of language style and communication modality on persuasion , 1998 .

[7]  S. Fiske,et al.  Controlling other people. The impact of power on stereotyping. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[8]  M. Heesacker,et al.  Effects of rhetorical questions on persuasion: A cognitive response analysis. , 1981 .

[9]  H. Kelman Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change , 1958 .

[10]  Michael Burgoon,et al.  Long-Term Effects of Language Intensity in Preventive Messages on Planned Family Solar Protection , 2000, Health communication.

[11]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Issue Involvement As a Moderator of the Effects on Attitude of Advertising Content and Context , 1981 .

[12]  D. Zillmann,et al.  Induction of Curiosity via Rhetorical Questions and its Effect on the Learning of Factual Materials. , 1973 .

[13]  Lawrence A. Hosman The Evaluative Consequences of Hedges, Hesitations, and Intensifiers: Powerful and Powerless Speech Styles. , 1989 .

[14]  H. Rao Unnava,et al.  Self-Referencing , 1989 .

[15]  J. W. Wright,et al.  The effects of hedges and hesitations on impression formation in a simulated courtroom context , 1987 .

[16]  R. Meyers,et al.  Powerful/Powerless Language Use in Group Interactions: Sex Differences or Similarities?. , 1997 .

[17]  H. Giles,et al.  Language attitudes as a social process: A conceptual model and new directions , 1994 .

[18]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Thought systems, argument quality, and persuasion. , 1991 .

[19]  P. Zimbardo,et al.  Interpersonal Dynamics in a Simulated Prison , 1972 .

[20]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  11. The role of metacognition in social judgment , 2007 .

[21]  Campbell Leaper,et al.  Women Are More Likely Than Men to Use Tentative Language, Aren’t They? A Meta-Analysis Testing for Gender Differences and Moderators , 2011 .

[22]  R. K. Aune,et al.  Effects of Language Intensity Similarity on Perceptions of Credibility Relational Attributions, and Persuasion , 1993 .

[23]  Mark Hamilton,et al.  Extending an Information Processing Model of Language Intensity Effects. , 1993 .

[24]  S. Milgram BEHAVIORAL STUDY OF OBEDIENCE. , 1963, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[25]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: the self-validation hypothesis. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  R. Emerson Power-Dependence Relations , 1962, Power in Modern Societies.

[27]  T. Holtgraves,et al.  Linguistic Power and Persuasion , 1999 .

[28]  Lawrence A. Hosman The Relationship between Locus of Control and the Evaluative Consequences of Powerful and Powerless Speech Styles , 1997 .

[29]  Traci Y. Craig,et al.  Something about Mary: Information Processing and the Persistence of Implicit Causality , 2012 .

[30]  William M. O'Barr,et al.  Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speech , 1978 .

[31]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[32]  Lawrence A. Hosman,et al.  The Impact of Power-of-Speech Style, Argument Strength, and Need for Cognition on Impression Formation, Cognitive Responses, and Persuasion , 2002 .

[33]  James J. Bradac,et al.  A Molecular View of Powerful and Powerless Speech Styles. , 1984 .

[34]  J. Bowers,et al.  THREE LANGUAGE VARIABLES IN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH: INTENSITY, IMMEDIACY, AND DIVERSITY , 1979 .

[35]  Charles S. Areni,et al.  The effects of sales presentation quality and initial perceptions on persuasion: a multiple role perspective , 2002 .

[36]  Traci Y. Craig,et al.  Rhetorical Question Use and Resistance to Persuasion: An Attitude Strength Analysis , 2006 .

[37]  Traci Y. Craig,et al.  Language and persuasion: Tag questions as powerless speech or as interpreted in context ☆ , 2007 .

[38]  Traci Y. Craig,et al.  Powerless Language Markers and the Correspondence Bias , 2007 .

[39]  Lawrence A. Hosman Language and Persuasion , 2002 .

[40]  Lawrence A. Hosman,et al.  Hedges, Tag Questions, Message Processing, and Persuasion , 2011 .

[41]  J. Bradac,et al.  Powerful Versus Powerless Language: Consequences for Persuasion, Impression Formation, and Cognitive Response , 1991 .

[42]  G. Miller,et al.  Prior Attitude and Language Intensity as Predictors of Message Style and Attitude Change Following Counterattitudinal Advocacy. , 1971 .

[43]  D. Buller,et al.  Using language intensity to increase the success of a family intervention to protect children from ultraviolet radiation: predictions from language expectancy theory. , 2000, Preventive medicine.

[44]  Sik Hung Ng,et al.  Language and Social Influence in Small Conversational Groups , 1986 .

[45]  A. Greenwald 6 – Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change1 , 1968 .

[46]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. , 1983 .

[47]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Controlling Self and Others: A Theory of Anxiety, Mental Control, and Social Control , 1996 .

[48]  Charles S. Areni,et al.  The effects of structural and grammatical variables on persuasion: An elaboration likelihood model perspective , 2003 .

[49]  R. Petty,et al.  Attitude strength : antecedents and consequences , 1995 .

[50]  Charles S. Areni,et al.  Language power and persuasion , 2005 .

[51]  M. Hamilton Message Variables That Mediate and Moderate the Effect of Equivocal Language on Source Credibility , 1998 .

[52]  R. Petty,et al.  What doesn't kill me makes me stronger: the effects of resisting persuasion on attitude certainty. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  Traci Y. Craig,et al.  Language and Persuasion: Linguistic Extremity Influences Message Processing and Behavioral Intentions , 2011 .

[54]  L. McMullen,et al.  Effects of communication apprehension, familiarity of partner, and topic on selected “women's language” features , 1992 .

[55]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. , 1998 .

[56]  R. Lakoff LANGUAGE AND WOMANS PLACE , 1973 .

[57]  Richard J. Lutz,et al.  The Role of Argument Quality in the Elaboration Likelihood Model , 1988 .

[58]  J. Bowers Language intensity, social introversion, and attitude change , 1963 .

[59]  G. Zimet,et al.  Behavioral interventions to increase HPV vaccination acceptability among mothers of young girls. , 2010, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[60]  Ron Borland,et al.  Impact of Behavioral Intention on Effectiveness of Message Features Evidence From the Family Sun Safety Project , 1998 .

[61]  John E. Baird,et al.  Sex differences in group communication: A review of relevant research , 1976 .

[62]  J. Sparks,et al.  Style Versus Substance: Multiple Roles of Language Power in Persuasion , 2007 .

[63]  Kevin L. Blankenship,et al.  The Role of Different Markers of Linguistic Powerlessness in Persuasion , 2005 .

[64]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.