Spatial distributions of understory light along the grassland/forest continuum: Effects of cover, height, and spatial pattern of tree canopies

Abstract The understory light environment is a key determinant of vegetation pattern and ecosystem processes, and varies spatially perhaps more than any resource used by plants. Understory light varies along gradients of vegetation structure that range from grassland with no woody canopy cover to forest with nearly complete woody canopy cover. Spatial variability in understory light is largely determined by several characteristics of overstory plants — spatial pattern, height, and cover — which vary concurrently along the grassland/forest continuum. Using a spatially-explicit ray-tracing model, we quantified trends in mean and variance of understory light along the continuum. We modeled understory light over a growing season for two types of plots: (1) generated plots in which cover, spatial pattern, and height of trees were varied systematically, and (2) three actual plots using stand data from pinon-juniper woodland sites for which cover, spatial pattern and height varied concurrently. Mean understory light decreased with increasing canopy cover and was sensitive to changes in height, as expected, but was not sensitive to spatial pattern. Variance in understory light was maximum at an intermediate value of cover that was dependent on both spatial pattern and cover — maximum variance occurred at lower values of cover as height increased and as spatial pattern progressed from regular to random to aggregated. These trends in the overall patterns of understory light were also examined with respect to changes in understory light in canopy and intercanopy locations. Variance in understory light for intercanopy locations was less than that for canopy locations at low canopy cover, but exceeded that for canopy locations as canopy cover increased. The value of canopy cover at which variance in intercanopy locations exceeded that in canopy locations was sensitive to variation in height but not in spatial pattern. The distributions of understory light for the actual plots were generally similar to those for corresponding generated plots, with dissimilarities attributable to differences in cover and height. The general trends highlighted by our simulations are broadly applicable to sites along the grassland/forest continuum.

[1]  Christopher E. Heil,et al.  Effects of Woody Plants on Microclimate in a Semiarid Woodland: Soil Temperature and Evaporation in Canopy and Intercanopy Patches , 1998, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[2]  F. J. Barnes,et al.  Carbon gain and water use in pinyon pine-juniper woodlands of northern New Mexico: field versus phytotron chamber measurements. , 1991, Tree physiology.

[3]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  North American Terrestrial Vegetation , 1988 .

[4]  D. Breshears,et al.  Hydrology and ecology of pinyon-juniper woodlands: Conceptual framework and field studies , 1994 .

[5]  T. Pukkala,et al.  Effect of crown shape and tree distribution on the spatial distribution of shade , 1987 .

[6]  T. Smith,et al.  Modeling vegetation structure-ecosystem process interactions across sites and ecosystems , 1993 .

[7]  Francisco de Castro,et al.  Three dimensional model of the interception of light by a canopy , 1998 .

[8]  D. Breshears,et al.  Soil Morphology of Canopy and Intercanopy Sites in a Piñon-Juniper Woodland , 1996 .

[9]  D. Retalis,et al.  Relationships of photosynthetically active radiation and shortwave irradiance , 1993 .

[10]  J. M. Norman,et al.  Partitioning solar radiation into direct and diffuse, visible and near-infrared components , 1985 .

[11]  C. Allen,et al.  Viewpoint: Sustainability of pinon-juniper ecosystems - A unifying perspective of soil erosion thresholds , 1998 .

[12]  C. Prentice.  Plants in changing environments: Linking physiological, population and community ecology , 1997 .

[13]  Timo Pukkala,et al.  Below‐Canopy distribution of photosynthetically active radiation and its relation to seedling growth in a boreal Pinus sylvestris stand , 1993 .

[14]  O. Sala,et al.  Ecosystem responses to changes in plant functional type composition: An example from the Patagonian steppe , 1996 .

[15]  R. Pieper,et al.  Plant distribution surrounding Rocky Mountain pinyon pine and oneseed juniper in south-central New Mexico , 1988 .

[16]  A. Brunner.  A light model for spatially explicit forest stand models , 1996 .

[17]  F. J. Barnes,et al.  OVERSTORY-IMPOSED HETEROGENEITY IN SOLAR RADIATION AND SOIL MOISTURE IN A SEMIARID WOODLAND , 1997 .

[18]  A. Cescatti.  Modelling the radiative transfer in discontinuous canopies of asymmetric crowns. I. Model structure and algorithms , 1997 .

[19]  Eric Haines,et al.  Essential ray tracing algorithms , 1989 .

[20]  Andrew S. Glassner,et al.  An introduction to ray tracing , 1989 .

[21]  J. Norman,et al.  Radiative Transfer in an Array of Canopies1 , 1983 .

[22]  J. G. Skellam,et al.  A New Method for determining the Type of Distribution of Plant Individuals , 1954 .

[23]  T. Pukkala,et al.  Relationship between radiation interception and photosynthesis in forest canopies: effect of stand structure and latitude , 1989 .

[24]  K. Lajtha,et al.  Plant Spatial Pattern and Nutrient Distribution in Pinyon-Juniper Woodlands Along an Elevational Gradient in Northern New Mexico , 1992, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[25]  T. Pukkala,et al.  Predicting spatial distribution of direct radiation below forest canopies , 1991 .

[26]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  Detection of Critical Densities Associated with Pinon‐Juniper Woodland Ecotones , 1996 .

[27]  J. F. Arnold.  Zonation of Understory Vegetation around a Juniper Tree , 1964 .

[28]  R. Walraven.  Calculating the position of the sun , 1978 .

[29]  Dean L. Urban,et al.  Implications of natural history traits to system-level dynamics: comparisons of a grassland and a forest , 1993 .

[30]  D. Breshears,et al.  Runoff and Erosion in a Piñon–Juniper Woodland Influence of Vegetation Patches , 1999 .

[31]  Craig A. Lindley,et al.  Practical ray tracing in C , 1992, Comput. Aided Des..

[32]  S. Martens,et al.  Differential use of spatially heterogeneous soil moisture by two semiarid woody species: Pinus edulis and Juniperus monosperma , 1997 .

[33]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  The interplay of facilitation and competition in plant communities , 1997 .

[34]  M. E. Floyd.  Dioecy in Five Pinus edulis Populations in the Southwestern United States , 1983 .

[35]  Scott N. Martens,et al.  Scales of aboveground and below‐ground competition in a semi‐arid woodland detected from spatial pattern , 1997 .

[36]  R. Scholes,et al.  Tree-grass interactions in Savannas , 1997 .

[37]  D. Tongway,et al.  Landscape Ecology, Function and Management: Principles from Australia's Rangelands , 1996 .

[38]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns , 1983 .

[39]  Guy R. McPherson,et al.  Ecology and Management of North American Savannas , 1998 .

[40]  Alessandro Cescatti,et al.  Modelling the radiative transfer in discontinuous canopies of asymmetric crowns. II. Model testing and application in a Norway spruce stand , 1997 .

[41]  Bradford P. Wilcox,et al.  Runoff and erosion in intercanopy zones of pinyon-juniper woodlands , 1994 .

[42]  S. Jørgensen,et al.  Movement rules for individual-based models of stream fish , 1999 .

[43]  Timo Pukkala,et al.  Simulation of within-tree and between-tree shading of direct radiation in a forest canopy: effect of crown shape and sun elevation , 1989 .

[44]  Paul G. Jarvis,et al.  Description and validation of an array model - MAESTRO. , 1990 .

[45]  C. Canham,et al.  Forest Gaps and Isolated Savanna Trees , 1994 .

[46]  P. Stenberg,et al.  Joint effect of angular distribution of radiation and spatial pattern of trees on radiation interception , 1998 .