What naturalistic stimuli tell us about pronoun resolution in real-time processing
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Crocker,et al. Retrieval (N400) and integration (P600) in expectation-based comprehension , 2021, PloS one.
[2] Ingmar Brilmayer,et al. Referential Chains Reveal Predictive Processes and Form-to-Function Mapping: An Electroencephalographic Study Using Naturalistic Story Stimuli , 2021, Frontiers in Psychology.
[3] M. Crocker,et al. When components collide: Spatiotemporal overlap of the N400 and P600 in language comprehension , 2021, Brain Research.
[4] Jesse A. Harris,et al. Extended Perspective Shift and Discourse Economy in Language Processing , 2021, Frontiers in Psychology.
[5] S. Hinterwimmer. Zum Zusammenspiel von Erzähler- und Protagonistenperspektive in den Brenner-Romanen von Wolf Haas , 2020 .
[6] B. Höhle,et al. Common Ground Information Affects Reference Resolution: Evidence From Behavioral Data, ERPs, and Eye-Tracking , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.
[7] V. Lai,et al. The mental representation and social aspect of expressives , 2020, Cognition & emotion.
[8] S. Hinterwimmer,et al. Constraints on German diese demonstratives: language formality and subject-avoidance , 2020, Glossa: a journal of general linguistics.
[9] Liberty S. Hamilton,et al. The revolution will not be controlled: natural stimuli in speech neuroscience , 2018, Language, cognition and neuroscience.
[10] Inge Kirsner. „Tschick“ , 2020, pop.religion: lebensstil – kultur – theologie.
[11] P. Schumacher,et al. Referential shift potential of demonstrative pronouns – Evidence from text continuation , 2020 .
[12] K. Heusinger,et al. Discourse prominence: Definition and application , 2019, Journal of Pragmatics.
[13] M. Bader,et al. The interpretation of German personal pronouns and d-pronouns , 2019, Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft.
[14] M. Crocker,et al. Event-related potentials index lexical retrieval (N400) and integration (P600) during language comprehension , 2019, Brain and Cognition.
[15] S. Hinterwimmer. Prominent protagonists , 2019 .
[16] M. Schlesewsky,et al. The exceptional nature of the first person in natural story processing and the transfer of egocentricity , 2018, Language, Cognition and Neuroscience.
[17] S. Hinterwimmer,et al. Demonstrative Pronouns and Propositional Attitudes , 2018 .
[18] Per B. Brockhoff,et al. lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .
[19] Phillip M. Alday,et al. Electrophysiology Reveals the Neural Dynamics of Naturalistic Auditory Language Processing: Event-Related Potentials Reflect Continuous Model Updates , 2016, eNeuro.
[20] Patrick Sturt,et al. Processing of It and This in Written Narrative Discourse , 2016 .
[21] Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,et al. Towards a Neurobiology of Information Structure , 2016 .
[22] Erich Schröger,et al. High-pass filters and baseline correction in M/EEG analysis-continued discussion , 2016, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.
[23] E. Schröger,et al. High-pass filters and baseline correction in M/EEG analysis. Commentary on: “How inappropriate high-pass filters can produce artefacts and incorrect conclusions in ERP studies of language and cognition” , 2016, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.
[24] Michael Burke,et al. Taking Perspective: Personal Pronouns Affect Experiential Aspects of Literary Reading , 2016, PloS one.
[25] Florian Schiel,et al. BAS Speech Science Web Services - an Update of Current Developments , 2016, LREC.
[26] M. de Vega,et al. Readers of narratives take the protagonist’s geographical perspective. Evidence from an event-related potential study , 2016, Brain and Language.
[27] S. Hinterwimmer,et al. Demonstrative pronouns and perspective , 2016 .
[28] P. Schumacher,et al. Thematic role as prominence cue during pronoun resolution in German , 2016 .
[29] P. Schumacher,et al. Backward- and Forward-Looking Potential of Anaphors , 2015, Front. Psychol..
[30] Erich Schröger,et al. Digital filter design for electrophysiological data – a practical approach , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.
[31] Israel de la Fuente. Putting pronoun resolution in context : the role of syntax, semantics, and pragmatics in pronoun interpretation , 2015 .
[32] Iryna Gurevych,et al. Automatic Annotation Suggestions and Custom Annotation Layers in WebAnno , 2014, ACL.
[33] Steven J. Luck,et al. ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[34] P. Schumacher,et al. Animacy matters: ERP evidence for the multi-dimensionality of topic-worthiness in Chinese , 2014, Brain Research.
[35] Petra B. Schumacher,et al. New is not always costly: evidence from online processing of topic and contrast in Japanese , 2013, Front. Psychol..
[36] D. Barr,et al. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.
[37] Sonja A. Kotz,et al. Prediction errors in self- and externally-generated deviants , 2013, Biological Psychology.
[38] Saveria Colonna,et al. Information structure effects on anaphora resolution in German and French: A crosslinguistic study of pronoun resolution , 2012 .
[39] B. Hemforth,et al. Different effects of focus in intra- and inter-sentential pronoun resolution in German , 2012 .
[40] Petra B. Schumacher,et al. Topicality matters: Position-specific demands on Chinese discourse processing , 2012, Neuroscience Letters.
[41] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. Eye movements and brain electric potentials during reading , 2012, Psychological research.
[42] E. Kaiser. Salience and contrast effects in reference resolution: The interpretation of Dutch pronouns and demonstratives , 2011 .
[43] Aibao Zhou,et al. An EEG study on the effect of self-relevant possessive pronoun: Self-referential content and first-person perspective , 2011, Neuroscience Letters.
[44] Neal R. Norrick,et al. 12. Reference and anaphora , 2011 .
[45] E. Kaiser. Relation between Coherence Relations and Anaphoric Demonstratives in German * , 2011 .
[46] Beate Sodian,et al. True- and false-belief reasoning in children and adults: An event-related potential study of theory of mind , 2011, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.
[47] Aibao Zhou,et al. An ERP study on the effect of self-relevant possessive pronoun , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.
[48] Joël Pynte,et al. Language specific preferences in anaphor resolution: Exposure or Gricean maxims? , 2010 .
[49] Christopher Potts,et al. Perspective-shifting with appositives and expressives , 2009 .
[50] Petra B. Schumacher,et al. Definiteness Marking Shows Late Effects during Discourse Processing: Evidence from ERPs , 2009, DAARC.
[51] M. Schlesewsky,et al. The neural mechanisms of word order processing revisited: Electrophysiological evidence from Japanese , 2008, Brain and Language.
[52] J. Trueswell,et al. Interpreting pronouns and demonstratives in Finnish: Evidence for a form-specific approach to reference resolution , 2008 .
[53] P. Bosch,et al. The Non-Subject Bias of German Demonstrative Pronouns , 2007 .
[54] Carla Umbach,et al. Reference Determination for Demonstrative Pronouns , 2007 .
[55] Petra Burkhardt,et al. Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: Evidence from event-related brain potentials , 2006, Brain and Language.
[56] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. When Peanuts Fall in Love: N400 Evidence for the Power of Discourse , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[57] Petra B. Schumacher,et al. The Syntax–Discourse Interface: Representing and interpreting dependency , 2005 .
[58] P. Gordon,et al. Electrophysiological Evidence for Reversed Lexical Repetition Effects in Language Processing , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[59] Frank Rösler,et al. Different Anaphoric Expressions Are Investigated by Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2004, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[60] Arnaud Delorme,et al. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.
[61] H. Gray,et al. P300 as an index of attention to self-relevant stimuli , 2004 .
[62] E. Kaiser. Word Order, Grammatical Function, and Referential Form: On the Patterns of Anaphoric Reference in Finnish , 2004 .
[63] M. Tanenhaus,et al. The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation , 2003 .
[64] Elsi Kaiser,et al. The quest for a referent: A crosslinguistic look at reference resolution , 2003 .
[65] Peter Bosch,et al. Demonstrative Pronouns and Personal Pronouns: German der vs er , 2003 .
[66] R. Sainsbury. Reference And Anaphora , 2002 .
[67] W. Abraham. Pronomina im Diskurs: deutsche Personal- und Demonstrativpronomina unter 'Zentrierungsperspektive'. Grammatische Überlegungen zu einer Teiltheorie der Textkohärenz , 2002 .
[68] Lyn Frazier,et al. Null vs. overt pronouns and the Topic-Focus articulation in Spanish: 2704 , 2002 .
[69] A. Friederici,et al. Localization of early syntactic processes in frontal and temporal cortical areas: A magnetoencephalographic study , 2000, Human brain mapping.
[70] Marjorie Taylor,et al. Neural Correlates of Theory-of-Mind Reasoning: An Event-Related Potential Study , 2000, Psychological science.
[71] D. Barr,et al. Taking Perspective in Conversation: The Role of Mutual Knowledge in Comprehension , 2000, Psychological science.
[72] Beatrice Primus,et al. Cases and thematic roles : ergative, accusative and active , 1999 .
[73] Florian Schiel,et al. Automatic Phonetic Transcription of Non-Prompted Speech , 1999 .
[74] Scott Weinstein,et al. Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse , 1995, CL.
[75] Alexis Dimitriadis,et al. When pro-Drop Languages Don't: On Overt Pronominal Subjects in Greek , 1995 .
[76] David R. Dowty. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .
[77] S. Baron-Cohen,et al. Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ? , 1985, Cognition.
[78] M. Kutas,et al. Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies , 1983, Memory & cognition.