Encoding and retrieval of landmark‐related spatial cues during navigation: An fMRI study

To successfully navigate, humans can use different cues from their surroundings. Learning locations in an environment can be supported by parallel subsystems in the hippocampus and the striatum. We used fMRI to look at differences in the use of object‐related spatial cues while 47 participants actively navigated in an open‐field virtual environment. In each trial, participants navigated toward a target object. During encoding, three positional cues (columns) with directional cues (shadows) were available. During retrieval, the removed target had to be replaced while either two objects without shadows (objects trial) or one object with a shadow (shadow trial) were available. Participants were informed in blocks about which type of retrieval trial was most likely to occur, thereby modulating expectations of having to rely on a single landmark or on a configuration of landmarks. How the spatial learning systems in the hippocampus and caudate nucleus were involved in these landmark‐based encoding and retrieval processes were investigated. Landmark configurations can create a geometry similar to boundaries in an environment. It was found that the hippocampus was involved in encoding when relying on configurations of landmarks, whereas the caudate nucleus was involved in encoding when relying on single landmarks. This might suggest that the observed hippocampal activation for configurations of objects is linked to a spatial representation observed with environmental boundaries. Retrieval based on configurations of landmarks activated regions associated with the spatial updation of object locations for reorientation. When only a single landmark was available during retrieval, regions associated with updating the location of oneself were activated. There was also evidence that good between‐participant performance was predicted by right hippocampal activation. This study therefore sheds light on how the brain deals with changing demands on spatial processing related purely to landmarks. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Knowing where and getting there: a human navigation network. , 1998, Science.

[2]  Gabriele Janzen,et al.  Neural Encoding of Objects Relevant for Navigation and Resting State Correlations with Navigational Ability , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  Weimin Mou,et al.  Roles of egocentric and allocentric spatial representations in locomotion and reorientation. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  K. Zilles,et al.  Neural Correlates of First-Person Perspective as One Constituent of Human Self-Consciousness , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  R. Muller,et al.  Failure of Centrally Placed Objects to Control the Firing Fields of Hippocampal Place Cells , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  M. Petrides,et al.  Cognitive Strategies Dependent on the Hippocampus and Caudate Nucleus in Human Navigation: Variability and Change with Practice , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  John M. Pearce,et al.  Hippocampal lesions disrupt navigation based on cognitive maps but not heading vectors , 1998, Nature.

[8]  Weimin Mou,et al.  Retrieving enduring spatial representations after disorientation , 2012, Cognition.

[9]  Christian F. Doeller,et al.  Imagining being somewhere else: neural basis of changing perspective in space. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Mental navigation along memorized routes activates the hippocampus, precuneus, and insula , 1997, Neuroreport.

[11]  K. Cheng The vector sum model of pigeon landmark use. , 1989 .

[12]  Christian F. Doeller,et al.  Establishing the Boundaries: The Hippocampal Contribution to Imagining Scenes , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Some psychophysics of the pigeon's use of landmarks , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[14]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons , 1996, Nature.

[15]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Modelling neural correlates of working memory: A coordinate-based meta-analysis , 2012, NeuroImage.

[16]  J. D. McGaugh,et al.  Double dissociation of fornix and caudate nucleus lesions on acquisition of two water maze tasks: further evidence for multiple memory systems. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[17]  A. Lew Looking beyond the boundaries: time to put landmarks back on the cognitive map? , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Dissociable neural circuits for encoding and retrieval of object locations during active navigation in humans , 2010, NeuroImage.

[19]  J. D. McGaugh,et al.  Inactivation of Hippocampus or Caudate Nucleus with Lidocaine Differentially Affects Expression of Place and Response Learning , 1996, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[20]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  Neil Burgess,et al.  Distinct error-correcting and incidental learning of location relative to landmarks and boundaries , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Sachin S. Deshmukh,et al.  Influence of local objects on hippocampal representations: Landmark vectors and memory , 2013, Hippocampus.

[23]  K. Jeffery Self-localization and the entorhinal–hippocampal system , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[24]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[25]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  Neural Correlates of Encoding Space from Route and Survey Perspectives , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Christian Büchel,et al.  Spatial updating: how the brain keeps track of changing object locations during observer motion , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  R. J. McDonald,et al.  Multiple Parallel Memory Systems in the Brain of the Rat , 2002, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[29]  R. Passingham The hippocampus as a cognitive map J. O'Keefe & L. Nadel, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1978). 570 pp., £25.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[30]  Arne D. Ekstrom,et al.  Cellular networks underlying human spatial navigation , 2003, Nature.

[31]  C. Büchel,et al.  Differential Recruitment of the Hippocampus, Medial Prefrontal Cortex, and the Human Motion Complex during Path Integration in Humans , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  K. Jeffery,et al.  The Boundary Vector Cell Model of Place Cell Firing and Spatial Memory , 2006, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[33]  M. Ernst,et al.  Walking Straight into Circles , 2009, Current Biology.

[34]  Albert Postma,et al.  Categorical and coordinate spatial relations in working memory: An fMRI study , 2009, Brain Research.

[35]  E. Maguire,et al.  The Well-Worn Route and the Path Less Traveled Distinct Neural Bases of Route Following and Wayfinding in Humans , 2003, Neuron.

[36]  Gabriele Janzen,et al.  Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Modulation of neural activity by angle of rotation during imagined spatial transformations , 2006, NeuroImage.

[38]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Modeling place fields in terms of the cortical inputs to the hippocampus , 2000, Hippocampus.

[39]  Weimin Mou,et al.  Defining a boundary in goal localization: Infinite number of points or extended surfaces. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  R. J. McDonald,et al.  Parallel information processing in the water maze: evidence for independent memory systems involving dorsal striatum and hippocampus. , 1994, Behavioral and neural biology.

[41]  Christian F. Doeller,et al.  Parallel striatal and hippocampal systems for landmarks and boundaries in spatial memory , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  D. Norris,et al.  BOLD contrast sensitivity enhancement and artifact reduction with multiecho EPI: Parallel‐acquired inhomogeneity‐desensitized fMRI , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.