Efficient Schemes for Computing α-tree Representations

Hierarchical image representations have been addressed by various models by the past, the max-tree being probably its best representative within the scope of Mathematical Morphology. However, the max-tree model requires to impose an ordering relation between pixels, from the lowest values (root) to the highest (leaves). Recently, the α-tree model has been introduced to avoid such an ordering. Indeed, it relies on image quasi-flat zones, and as such focuses on local dissimilarities. It has led to successful attempts in remote sensing and video segmentation. In this paper, we deal with the problem of α-tree computation, and propose several efficient schemes which help to ensure real-time (or near-real time) morphological image processing.

[1]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Pattern Spectra from Partition Pyramids and Hierarchies , 2011, ISMM.

[2]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics , 2001, Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001.

[3]  Michel Couprie,et al.  Building the Component Tree in Quasi-Linear Time , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Constrained connectivity for hierarchical image partitioning and simplification , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  Robert E. Tarjan,et al.  Efficiency of a Good But Not Linear Set Union Algorithm , 1972, JACM.

[6]  Christophe Collet,et al.  Hyperconnections and Hierarchical Representations for Grayscale and Multiband Image Processing , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  John I. Goutsias,et al.  Mathematical Morphology and its Applications to Image and Signal Processing , 2000, Computational Imaging and Vision.

[8]  Philippe Salembier,et al.  Binary partition tree as an efficient representation for image processing, segmentation, and information retrieval , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[9]  Michael H. F. Wilkinson,et al.  Mathematical Morphology and Its Application to Signal and Image Processing, 9th International Symposium, ISMM 2009, Groningen, The Netherlands, August 24-27, 2009 Proceedings , 2009, ISMM.

[10]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Constrained Connectivity and Transition Regions , 2009, ISMM.

[11]  Soille Pierre,et al.  THE SWITCHBOARD PLATFORM FOR INTERACTIVE IMAGE INFORMATION MINING , 2012 .

[12]  Sébastien Lefèvre,et al.  Fast Image and Video Segmentation Based on Alpha-tree Multiscale Representation , 2012, 2012 Eighth International Conference on Signal Image Technology and Internet Based Systems.

[13]  Philippe Salembier,et al.  Antiextensive connected operators for image and sequence processing , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[14]  Jean Serra Anamorphoses and function lattices , 1993, Optics & Photonics.

[15]  Mohamed Akil,et al.  Parallel Hardware Implementation of Connected Component Tree Computation , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications.

[16]  Soille Pierre,et al.  Applications of Discrete Geometry and Mathematical Morphology , 2012, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[17]  Pierre Soille,et al.  On Morphological Hierarchical Representations for Image Processing and Spatial Data Clustering , 2010, WADGMM.