Genetic mapping of QTLs affecting tree growth and architecture in Populus: implication for ideotype breeding

A segregated F2 progeny derived from two highly divergent poplar species, Populus trichocarpa and P. deltoides, was used to evaluate the genetic basis of canopy structure and function in a clonally replicated plantation. The QTLs of large effect on growth, branch, and leaf traits were identified using the Populus linkage map constructed by 343 molecular markers. Stem height and harvest index appeared to be under the control of few QTLs with major effects, whereas variation in stem basal area, volume, and dry weight might be due to many more QTLs. Branch and leaf traits on sylleptics tended to include more QTLs with major effects than those on proleptics. In the environment where the pedigree was tested, sylleptics were very frequent in the P. trichocarpa parent but rare in the P. deltoides parent. For sylleptic traits for which two or more QTLs were identified, however, increases in the trait values were conditioned not only by the P. trichocarpa alleles, but also by the P. deltoides alleles. Similar findings were found for traits on proleptics that were differently expressed between the two parents. For both sylleptic and proleptic branch types, dominance (ranging from partial to over) was observed. The QTLs on specific linkage groups were found to be responsible for relationships between stem growth and its developmental components. Similar QTL clustering was also observed for morphological or developmental integration in poplar, i.e., traits with similar developmental origins are more strongly correlated with one another than traits with different developmental origins. The implications of these molecular genetic results for ideotype breeding of poplars are discussed.

[1]  Reinhart Ceulemans,et al.  Is There a Light Regime Determined Tree Ideotype , 1994 .

[2]  Rongling Wu Simulated optimal structure of a photosynthetic system: implication for the breeding of forest crop ideotype , 1993 .

[3]  P. Larson Stem Form Development of Forest Trees , 1963 .

[4]  J. Doebley,et al.  Inheritance of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte: comparison of results for two F2 populations. , 1993, Genetics.

[5]  C. Mitchell Ecophysiology of short rotation forest crops , 1992 .

[6]  M. Zimmermann,et al.  Trees: Structure and Function. , 1972 .

[7]  M. Cannell,et al.  Attributes of trees as crop plants , 1985 .

[8]  P. Tigerstedt,et al.  Definition and exploitation of forest tree ideotypes in Finland , 1985 .

[9]  S. Tanksley,et al.  QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross. , 1993, Genetics.

[10]  R. Chazdon The Costs of Leaf Support in Understory Palms: Economy Versus Safety , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[11]  L. B. Leopold,et al.  Trees and streams: the efficiency of branching patterns. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  R. Wu,et al.  The genetic resolution of juvenile canopy structure and function in a three-generation pedigree of Populus , 1996, Trees.

[13]  K. Niklas,et al.  Theories of optimization, form and function in branching architecture in plants , 1995 .

[14]  E. Lander,et al.  Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations, and environments. , 1991, Genetics.

[15]  D. I. Dickmann,et al.  The ideotype concept and the genetic improvement of tree crops , 1994 .

[16]  T. McMahon,et al.  Tree structures: deducing the principle of mechanical design. , 1976, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  R. Rosen Optimality Principles in Biology , 1967, Springer US.

[18]  R. L. Berg,et al.  THE ECOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF CORRELATION PLEIADES , 1960 .

[19]  P. Heilman,et al.  Populus trichocarpa × Populus deltoides hybrids for short rotation culture: variation patterns and 4-year field performance , 1988 .

[20]  S. Knapp,et al.  Using molecular markers to estimate quantitative trait locus parameters: power and genetic variances for unreplicated and replicated progeny. , 1990, Genetics.

[21]  D. Levin,et al.  Phenotypic integration and plastic correlations in Phlox drummondii (Polemoniaceae) , 1993 .

[22]  M. Cannell,et al.  Light Use Efficiency and Woody Biomass Production of Poplar and Willow , 1988 .

[23]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Physiological, morphological and anatomical components of hybrid vigor in Populus. , 1989 .

[24]  E. Lander,et al.  Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. , 1992, Genetics.

[25]  C. Gasser,et al.  Genetically Engineering Plants for Crop Improvement , 1989, Science.

[26]  S. Tanksley,et al.  Genes from wild rice improve yield , 1996, Nature.

[27]  E. D. Ford Branching, crown structure and the control of timber production , 1985 .

[28]  R. Stettler,et al.  Molecular genetics of growth and development in populus. IV. Mapping QTLs with large effects on growth, form, and phenology traits in a forest tree. , 1995, Genetics.

[29]  A. Groover,et al.  Identification of quantitative trait loci influencing wood specific gravity in an outbred pedigree of loblolly pine. , 1994, Genetics.

[30]  J. Isebrands,et al.  Effects of leaf display on light interception and apparent photosynthesis in two contrasting Populus cultivars during their second growing season. , 1990, Tree physiology.