Adaptive smoothing of evoked potentials

Abstract Evoked potentials (EPs) are very low amplitude signals generated in brain or spinal nervous structures after a brief stimulation of peripheral sensory organs. Their extraction from the ongoing electroencephalogram requires sophisticated signal processing methods, because the signal-to-noise ratio is very low. The basic time-locked average of successive responses to a train of stimulations obviously improves the SNR but is unable to track the slow variations of significant waves. Therefore, adaptive techniques are used to reduce the number of stimulations and this is what the present article will attempt to describe. One can consider the successive elementary responses as the rows of a bidimensional signal, the columns of which being made up of the points having the same time delay from the stimulus. The proposed signal processing consists of a ‘vertical’ exponential filtering (equivalent to a sliding-window averaging), associated with a ‘horizontal’ forward-backward non-causal smoothing based on a new statistical model of the filtered signal, leading to a very efficient global algorithm. The proposed 2D processing allows a real-time (row after row) extraction of smoothed responses, providing an unbiased and adaptive location of the EPs waves.

[1]  Clare D. McGillem,et al.  Measurements of Signal Components in Single Visualy Evoked Brain Potentials , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  K. Yu,et al.  Optimum Filters for Estimating Evoked Potential Waveforms , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  T A Pedley,et al.  Real-time reconstruction of evoked potentials using a new two-dimensional filter method. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  J Möcks,et al.  Does filtering and smoothing of average evoked potentials really pay? A statistical comparison. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  D G Wastell When Wiener filtering is less than optimal: a illustrative application to the brain stem evoked potential. , 1981, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  N V Thakor,et al.  Adaptive Filterng of Evoked Potentials , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  H Künkel,et al.  ARMA – Filtering of Evoked Potentials , 1984, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[8]  R. Singer Estimating Optimal Tracking Filter Performance for Manned Maneuvering Targets , 1970, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[9]  R A Dobie,et al.  Optimal ('Wiener') digital filtering of auditory evoked potentials: use of coherence estimates. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  C. Doncarli,et al.  Lissage-detection de signaux non stationnaires , 1988 .

[11]  D. Fraser,et al.  The optimum linear smoother as a combination of two optimum linear filters , 1969 .

[12]  C. K. Yuen,et al.  Theory and Application of Digital Signal Processing , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[13]  E. Micheli-Tzanakou,et al.  An adaptive approach to spectral analysis of pattern-reversal visual potentials , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Ashley J. Welch,et al.  ADAPTIVE ESTIMATION OF SINGLE EVOKED POTENTIALS. , 1986 .

[15]  M. von Spreckelsen,et al.  Estimation of single-evoked cerebral potentials by means of parametric modeling and Kalman filtering , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Sidney Katz,et al.  Is Wiener Filtering an Effective Method of Improving Evoked Potential Estimation? , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  N. Thakor,et al.  Adaptive Fourier estimation of time-varying evoked potentials , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Jorge I. Aunon,et al.  Classification and Detection of Single Evoked Brain Potentials Using Time-Frequency Amplitude Features , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.