Joint estimation of activity and attenuation for PET using pragmatic MR-based prior: application to clinical TOF PET/MR whole-body data for FDG and non-FDG tracers

Accurate and robust attenuation correction remains challenging in hybrid PET/MR particularly for torsos because it is difficult to segment bones, lungs and internal air in MR images. Additionally, MR suffers from susceptibility artifacts when a metallic implant is present. Recently, joint estimation (JE) of activity and attenuation based on PET data, also known as maximum likelihood reconstruction of activity and attenuation, has gained considerable interest because of (1) its promise to address the challenges in MR-based attenuation correction (MRAC), and (2) recent advances in time-of-flight (TOF) technology, which is known to be the key to the success of JE. In this paper, we implement a JE algorithm using an MR-based prior and evaluate the algorithm using whole-body PET/MR patient data, for both FDG and non-FDG tracers, acquired from GE SIGNA PET/MR scanners with TOF capability. The weight of the MR-based prior is spatially modulated, based on MR signal strength, to control the balance between MRAC and JE. Large prior weights are used in strong MR signal regions such as soft tissue and fat (i.e. MR tissue classification with a high degree of certainty) and small weights are used in low MR signal regions (i.e. MR tissue classification with a low degree of certainty). The MR-based prior is pragmatic in the sense that it is convex and does not require training or population statistics while exploiting synergies between MRAC and JE. We demonstrate the JE algorithm has the potential to improve the robustness and accuracy of MRAC by recovering the attenuation of metallic implants, internal air and some bones and by better delineating lung boundaries, not only for FDG but also for more specific non-FDG tracers such as 68Ga-DOTATOC and 18F-Fluoride.

[1]  D. Hunter,et al.  A Tutorial on MM Algorithms , 2004 .

[2]  Ciprian Catana,et al.  Toward Implementing an MRI-Based PET Attenuation-Correction Method for Neurologic Studies on the MR-PET Brain Prototype , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  Craig S. Levin,et al.  An Expectation Maximization Method for Joint Estimation of Emission Activity Distribution and Photon Attenuation Map in PET , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  B. Schölkopf,et al.  Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[5]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  ML-reconstruction for TOF-PET with simultaneous estimation of the attenuation factors , 2014, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[6]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Joint Estimation of Activity and Attenuation in Whole-Body TOF PET/MRI Using Constrained Gaussian Mixture Models , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Florian Wiesinger,et al.  Joint estimation of activity and attenuation: Application to non-FDG TOF PET/MR clinical data , 2016, 2016 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Medical Imaging Conference and Room-Temperature Semiconductor Detector Workshop (NSS/MIC/RTSD).

[8]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[9]  Yannick Berker,et al.  Lung attenuation coefficient estimation using Maximum Likelihood reconstruction of attenuation and activity for PET/MR attenuation correction , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[10]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Quantitative analysis of MRI-guided attenuation correction techniques in time-of-flight brain PET/MRI , 2016, NeuroImage.

[11]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners. , 2003, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[12]  H. Herzog,et al.  Alternative methods for attenuation correction for PET images in MR-PET scanners , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[13]  Sangtae Ahn,et al.  Convergent iterative algorithms for joint reconstruction of activity and attenuation from time-of-flight PET data , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[14]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Tissue Classification as a Potential Approach for Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body PET/MRI: Evaluation with PET/CT Data , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  Michael E Casey,et al.  Evaluation of MLACF based calculated attenuation brain PET imaging for FDG patient studies , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Kris Thielemans,et al.  A comparative study of multiple scatter estimations in 3D PET , 2010, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[17]  T. Nyholm,et al.  A review of substitute CT generation for MRI-only radiation therapy , 2017, Radiation oncology.

[18]  J. Bowsher,et al.  Scatter Correction Requirements for Likelihood-Based Attenuation Artifact Correction in PET , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[19]  James E. Bowsher,et al.  Anomaly Detection and Artifact Recovery in PET Attenuation-Correction Images Using the Likelihood Function , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[20]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  Optimized MLAA for quantitative non-TOF PET/MR of the brain , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Hakan Erdogan,et al.  Ordered subsets algorithms for transmission tomography. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Andre Salomon,et al.  Investigation of practical initial attenuation image estimates in TOF-MLAA reconstruction for PET/MR. , 2016, Medical physics.

[23]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Accurate PET/MR Quantification Using Time of Flight MLAA Image Reconstruction , 2014, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[24]  Ninon Burgos,et al.  Attenuation Correction Synthesis for Hybrid PET-MR Scanners: Application to Brain Studies , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Gaspar Delso,et al.  Clinical evaluation of TOF versus non-TOF on PET artifacts in simultaneous PET/MR: a dual centre experience , 2017, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[26]  Pau-Choo Chung,et al.  A Fast Algorithm for Multilevel Thresholding , 2001, J. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[27]  J. Bowsher,et al.  Recovery of localized defects in PET attenuation-correction images , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[28]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Emission-based estimation of lung attenuation coefficients for attenuation correction in time-of-flight PET/MR , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  J. S. Karp,et al.  Recent developments in time-of-flight PET , 2016, EJNMMI Physics.

[31]  Mao-Jiun J. Wang,et al.  Image thresholding by minimizing the measures of fuzzines , 1995, Pattern Recognit..

[32]  M. Defrise,et al.  Time-of-flight PET data determine the attenuation sinogram up to a constant , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Clinical Assessment of Emission- and Segmentation-Based MR-Guided Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body Time-of-Flight PET/MR Imaging , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  Patrick Veit-Haibach,et al.  18F-FDG-PET/MR increases diagnostic confidence in detection of bone metastases compared with 18F-FDG-PET/CT , 2015, Nuclear medicine communications.

[35]  Kyungsang Kim,et al.  Joint estimation of activity image and attenuation sinogram using time-of-flight positron emission tomography data consistency condition filtering , 2017, Journal of medical imaging.

[36]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Fast Monotonic Algorithms for Transmission Tomography , 1999, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[37]  C. C. Watson New, faster, image-based scatter correction for 3D PET , 1999 .

[38]  Til Aach,et al.  Simultaneous Reconstruction of Activity and Attenuation for PET/MR , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[39]  J. Schenck The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. , 1996, Medical physics.

[40]  Yusheng Li,et al.  Attenuation correction in emission tomography using the emission data--A review. , 2016, Medical physics.

[41]  G. Delso,et al.  Evaluation of an Atlas-Based PET Head Attenuation Correction Using PET/CT & MR Patient Data , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[42]  W. Heiss,et al.  Hybrid PET/MR Imaging in Neurology: Present Applications and Prospects for the Future , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[43]  Josef A. Lundman,et al.  Zero TE‐based pseudo‐CT image conversion in the head and its application in PET/MR attenuation correction and MR‐guided radiation therapy planning , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[44]  G. Delso,et al.  Zero TE MR bone imaging in the head , 2016, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[45]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI: A Novel Approach Combining Pattern Recognition and Atlas Registration , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[46]  S Ted Treves,et al.  Skeletal PET with 18F-Fluoride: Applying New Technology to an Old Tracer* , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[47]  Suleman Surti,et al.  Advances in time-of-flight PET. , 2016, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[48]  S. Thiruvenkadam,et al.  Comparison of 4-class and continuous fat/water methods for whole-body, MR-based PET attenuation correction , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[49]  Andrew P. Leynes,et al.  Hybrid ZTE/Dixon MR‐based attenuation correction for quantitative uptake estimation of pelvic lesions in PET/MRI , 2017, Medical physics.

[50]  R. Günther,et al.  Automatic, three-segment, MR-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MR data , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[51]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[52]  Tyler J. Fraum,et al.  PET/MRI: Emerging Clinical Applications in Oncology. , 2016, Academic radiology.

[53]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  MR–Consistent Simultaneous Reconstruction of Attenuation and Activity for Non–TOF PET/MR , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[54]  Paul K Marsden,et al.  PET-MRI: a review of challenges and solutions in the development of integrated multimodality imaging , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[55]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Simultaneous maximum a posteriori reconstruction of attenuation and activity distributions from emission sinograms , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[56]  Ciprian Catana,et al.  PET/MRI in the Presence of Metal Implants: Completion of the Attenuation Map from PET Emission Data , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[57]  M. Conti Why is TOF PET reconstruction a more robust method in the presence of inconsistent data? , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[58]  Stephan G Nekolla,et al.  Assessing Myocardial Metabolism with Hybrid PET Imaging: Instrumentation, Concepts, and Workflows. , 2016, Current pharmaceutical design.

[59]  R. Wahl,et al.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[60]  P. Piccini,et al.  Applications of positron emission tomography (PET) in neurology , 2004, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[61]  Yannick Berker,et al.  MLAA-based attenuation correction of flexible hardware components in hybrid PET/MR imaging , 2017, EJNMMI Physics.

[62]  P. Schöffski,et al.  Biokinetics and imaging with the somatostatin receptor PET radioligand 68Ga-DOTATOC: preliminary data , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[63]  Florian Wiesinger,et al.  Joint reconstruction of activity and attenuation using MR-based priors: Application to clinical TOF PET/MR , 2015, 2015 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[64]  Michel Defrise,et al.  sMLACF: a generalized expectation-maximization algorithm for TOF-PET to reconstruct the activity and attenuation simultaneously , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[65]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Impact of Time-of-Flight PET on Quantification Errors in MR Imaging–Based Attenuation Correction , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[66]  Dattesh Shanbhag,et al.  Improved attenuation correction in PET/MRI by combining MR image segmentation and joint estimation approaches , 2013 .

[67]  A. Buck,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of Zero-Echo-Time Attenuation Correction for Brain 18F-FDG PET/MRI: Comparison with Atlas Attenuation Correction , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[68]  Y. Censor,et al.  A New Approach to the Emission Computerized Tomography Problem: Simultaneous Calculation of Attenuation and Activity Coefficients , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[69]  Sangtae Ahn,et al.  Analysis of the effects of errors in attenuation maps on PET quantitation in TOF PET , 2014, 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[70]  Samuel Matej,et al.  Transmission-less attenuation estimation from time-of-flight PET histo-images using consistency equations , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[71]  Gaspar Delso,et al.  Incorporation of Time-of-Flight Information Reduces Metal Artifacts in Simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Simulation Study , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[72]  F Hofheinz,et al.  Evaluation and automatic correction of metal-implant-induced artifacts in MR-based attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MR imaging , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[73]  Stephan G Nekolla,et al.  Attenuation correction for PET/MR: problems, novel approaches and practical solutions. , 2012, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[74]  Gaspar Delso,et al.  Design Features and Mutual Compatibility Studies of the Time-of-Flight PET Capable GE SIGNA PET/MR System , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[75]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  Completion of a truncated attenuation image from the attenuated PET emission data , 2013, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[76]  V. Schulz,et al.  Challenges and current methods for attenuation correction in PET/MR , 2013, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[77]  Steven G. Ross,et al.  Application and Evaluation of a Measured Spatially Variant System Model for PET Image Reconstruction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[78]  S. Vandenberghe,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI Using Ultrashort Echo Time Sequences , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.