A simulation model of the Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations and the decomposition of the redundancy

A Triple Helix (TH) network of bi- and trilateral relations among universities, industries, and governments can be considered as an ecosystem in which uncertainty can be reduced when functions become synergetic. The functions are based on correlations among distributions of relations, and therefore latent. The correlations span a vector space in which two vectors (P and Q) can be used to represent forward “sending” and reflexive “receiving,” respectively. These two vectors can also be understood in terms of the generation versus reduction of uncertainty in the communication field that results from interactions among the three bi-lateral channels of communication. We specify a system of Lotka–Volterra equations between the vectors that can be solved. Redundancy generation can then be simulated and the results can be decomposed in terms of the TH components. Furthermore, we show that the strength and frequency of the relations are independent parameters in the model. Redundancy generation in TH arrangements can be decomposed using Fourier analysis of the time-series of empirical studies. As an example, the case of co-authorship relations in Japan is re-analyzed. The model allows us to interpret the sinusoidal functions of the Fourier analysis as representing redundancies.

[1]  Lucio Biggiero,et al.  Italian Industrial Districts: A Triple Helix Pattern of Problem Solving , 1998 .

[2]  O. Sjaastad Epilogue , 1891, The Hospital.

[3]  H. Maturana,et al.  Autopoiesis and Cognition , 1980 .

[4]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[5]  H. Maibom Social Systems , 2007 .

[6]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[7]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact , 2015, Online Inf. Rev..

[8]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Where is synergy indicated in the Norwegian innovation system? Triple-Helix relations among technology, organization, and geography , 2011, 1109.6597.

[9]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in Technology Studies , 1994 .

[10]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Nataša Golubovi,et al.  NETWORK STRUCTURE OF SOCIAL CAPITAL , 2010 .

[12]  S. Kraemer Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Gregory Bateson , 1993, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[13]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Has globalization strengthened South Korea’s national research system? National and international dynamics of the Triple Helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea , 2011, Scientometrics.

[14]  A. Berryman,et al.  A Third Window: Natural Life Beyond Newton and Darwin.ByRobert E. Ulanowicz; foreword by, Stuart A. Kauffman. West Conshohocken (Pennsylvania): Templeton Foundation Press. $24.95 (paper). xxviii + 196 p.; ill.; name and subject indexes. 978‐1‐59947‐154‐9. 2009. , 2009 .

[15]  H. Maturana,et al.  Autopoiesis and Cognition : The Realization of the Living (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Scie , 1980 .

[16]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Information of interactions in complex systems , 2009, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[17]  L. Henderson On the Social System , 1993 .

[18]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Science Visualization and Discursive Knowledge , 2012, 1206.3746.

[19]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The communication of meaning in social systems , 2009, 0911.1048.

[20]  P. Strydom,et al.  Triple contingency , 1999 .

[21]  Pichler Progress in Cybernetics and Systems Research , 1981 .

[22]  Daril A. Vilhena Beyond bibliometrics : Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact , 2022 .

[23]  John F. Padgett,et al.  The Emergence of Organizations and Markets , 2012 .

[24]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[25]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .

[26]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  ‘Meaning’ as a sociological concept: A review of the modeling, mapping and simulation of the communication of knowledge and meaning , 2010, ArXiv.

[27]  E. Kamke Differentialgleichungen : Lösungsmethoden und Lösungen , 1977 .

[28]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Ross Ashby's information theory: a bit of history, some solutions to problems, and what we face today , 2009, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[29]  Lucio Biggiero,et al.  Self-Organizing Processes in Building Entrepreneurial Networks: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation , 2012 .

[30]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University–industry–government versus international coauthorship relations , 2009 .

[31]  Daniel M. Dubois,et al.  Computing anticipatory systems with incursion and hyperincursion , 2008 .

[32]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The Swedish System of Innovation: Regional Synergies in a Knowledge-Based Economy , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[33]  A. Valle,et al.  Diffusion of nuclear energy in some developing countries , 2014 .

[34]  Raymond W. Yeung,et al.  Information Theory and Network Coding , 2008 .

[35]  J G Daugman,et al.  Information Theory and Coding , 1998 .

[36]  R. Vanderstraeten The autopoiesis of social systems , 2014 .

[37]  William J. McGill Multivariate information transmission , 1954, Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory.

[38]  Robert E. Ulanowicz,et al.  The dual nature of ecosystem dynamics , 2009 .

[39]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Mutual redundancies in interhuman communication systems: Steps toward a calculus of processing meaning , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[40]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Radical Constructivism and Radical Constructedness: Luhmann’s Sociology of Semantics, Organizations, and Self-Organization , 2012 .