Medical Imaging Safety in Global Health Radiology

Attention to matters of safety is important in any imaging facility. In the context of low- and middle-income countries, limited resources may complicate the attempt to set up and operate an imaging facility with the highest standards of safety, but it is important to see that all applicable safety measures are nonetheless carried out. Imaging safety involves several general principles, including the need to minimize radiation exposure consistent with answering the clinical question at hand. Safety considerations relevant to patients, staff, and the general public must be addressed. Considerations specific to individual modalities include appropriate limitations on exposure in x-ray and CT imaging, attention to magnetic field hazards in magnetic resonance imaging, proper preparation and control of radionuclides in nuclear medicine, and avoidance of excessive prenatal imaging procedures with ultrasound. An important general safety consideration for all imaging modalities is assuring proper clinical utilization, which includes factors such as not performing imaging procedures without medical referral and supervision, attention to image quality to ensure procedures are not repeated unnecessarily, and carefully considering the clinical appropriateness of any requested imaging procedure. Training and credentialing of staff is of utmost importance, and includes staff who design, prepare, and evaluate a new imaging facility as well as medical staff who acquire, order, or review images. Ensuring imaging safety requires the input of a team of experts, including trained and qualified medical physicists, health physicists, radiation safety officers, clinical safety personnel, installation and service personnel, radiologic technologists, and radiologists. With appropriate attention to safety, diagnostic imaging is a useful component of healthcare services in resource-limited regions.

[1]  Donald P. Frush,et al.  MDCT in Children: Scan Techniques and Contrast Issues , 2008 .

[2]  John Gosbee,et al.  ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Geoffrey D. Rubin,et al.  Body CT: technical advances for improving safety. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  Donald P. Frush,et al.  The ALARA concept in pediatric imaging: building bridges between radiology and emergency medicine: consensus conference on imaging safety and quality for children in the emergency setting, Feb. 23–24, 2008, Orlando, FL – Executive Summary , 2008, Pediatric Radiology.

[5]  V. Fuchs,et al.  Physicians' views of the relative importance of thirty medical innovations. , 2001, Health affairs.

[6]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  Managing radiation use in medical imaging: a multifaceted challenge. , 2011, Radiology.

[7]  Richard H Cohan,et al.  Incidence and severity of acute allergic-like reactions to i.v. nonionic iodinated contrast material in children. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  J. Boice,et al.  Radiation epidemiology and recent paediatric computed tomography studies , 2015, Annals of the ICRP.

[9]  Stephen Balter,et al.  Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients' skin and hair. , 2010, Radiology.

[10]  Frank G. Shellock,et al.  Reference Manual for Magnetic Resonance Safety, Implants, and Devices , 2009 .

[11]  Y C Lin,et al.  Emergency management and infection control in a radiology department during an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome. , 2005, The British journal of radiology.

[12]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Radiation dose reduction to the breast in thoracic CT: comparison of bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation, and use of a globally decreased tube current. , 2011, Medical physics.

[13]  J. Mathews,et al.  Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians , 2013, BMJ.

[14]  F. Sung,et al.  Paediatric head CT scan and subsequent risk of malignancy and benign brain tumour: a nation-wide population-based cohort study , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.

[15]  C. Claussen,et al.  Erratum to: Risk of cancer incidence before the age of 15 years after exposure to ionising radiation from computed tomography: results from a German cohort study , 2015, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[16]  D. Larson,et al.  National trends in CT use in the emergency department: 1995-2007. , 2011, Radiology.

[17]  James H Thrall,et al.  Addressing overutilization in medical imaging. , 2010, Radiology.

[18]  Peter Vock,et al.  Using the American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry to Evaluate Practice Patterns and Radiation Dose Estimates of Pediatric Body CT. , 2018, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  Rutger A. J. Nievelstein,et al.  Multidetector CT in children: current concepts and dose reduction strategies , 2010, Pediatric Radiology.

[20]  Marilyn Hravnak,et al.  Intrahospital Transport to the Radiology Department: Risk for Adverse Events, Nursing Surveillance, Utilization of a MET and Practice Implications. , 2011, Journal of radiology nursing.

[21]  James T. Dobbins Image Quality Metrics for Digital Systems , 2000 .

[22]  David Zurakowski,et al.  Has pediatric CT at children's hospitals reached its peak? , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Effective dose efficiency: an application-specific metric of quality and dose for digital radiography , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Donald P. Frush,et al.  Bismuth shielding in CT: support for use in children , 2010, Pediatric Radiology.

[25]  Keith J Strauss,et al.  Image gently: Ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT dose for pediatric patients. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  Sheila Weinmann,et al.  The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. , 2013, JAMA pediatrics.

[27]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Use of medical imaging procedures with ionizing radiation in children: a population-based study. , 2011, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[28]  Lisa M Ho,et al.  Conventional and reduced radiation dose of 16-MDCT for detection of nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  Jenia Vassileva,et al.  IAEA survey of paediatric computed tomography practice in 40 countries in Asia, Europe, Latin America and Africa: procedures and protocols , 2012, European Radiology.

[30]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Assessment of detective quantum efficiency: intercomparison of a recently introduced international standard with prior methods. , 2007, Radiology.

[31]  H. Brisse,et al.  Comment on: Are the studies on cancer risk from CT scans biased by indication? Elements of answer from a large-scale cohort study in France , 2015, British Journal of Cancer.

[32]  K. P. Kim,et al.  Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study , 2012, The Lancet.

[33]  Daniel A. Hirsh,et al.  Trends in Computed Tomography Utilization in the Pediatric Emergency Department , 2012, Pediatrics.