Effects of degree of segmentation and learner disposition on multimedia learning

The construction of asynchronous learning environments often involves the creation of self-paced multimedia instructional episodes that provide the learner with control over the pacing of instruction (segmentation); however, does the amount of segmentation impact learning? This study explored the effects of the degree of segmentation on recall and application of new knowledge and the nature of learner dispositions toward segmentation. Undergraduate students ( n = 212) were randomly assigned to engage in a 9-minute multimedia tutorial (ie, instructionally designed video-based presentation) addressing historical inquiry that was divided into 1, 7, 14 or 28 segments (degree of segmentation) where students had control over when each segment began via a 'Continue' button. Students' dispositions toward the segmentation-helped learning, made learning easier, made learning confusing, was annoying or seemed appropriate-were also measured. Results indicated that increased segmentation facilitated recall and application; however, learners perceived a high degree of segmentation (28 segments) more negatively. Overall, these results indicate that increased segmentation within a multimedia instructional environment has a positive influence on recall and application, regardless of the learner's disposition toward the segmentation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  Tamara van Gog,et al.  An expertise reversal effect of segmentation in learning from animated worked-out examples , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  Susanne Narciss,et al.  Interactivity and Learners’ Achievement in Web-Based Learning , 2007 .

[3]  P. Chandler,et al.  Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn , 1994 .

[4]  R. Mayer,et al.  How Seductive Details Do Their Damage: A Theory of Cognitive Interest in Science Learning , 1998 .

[5]  The Effect of Study Techniques, Study Preferences, and Familiarity on Later Recall , 1978 .

[6]  R. Mayer,et al.  When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? , 2001 .

[7]  M. Mitchell Waldrop,et al.  Massive Open Online Courses, aka MOOCs, Transform Higher Education and Science , 2014 .

[8]  KIMBERLY A. LAWLESS,et al.  Multimedia learning environments: Issues of learner control and navigation , 1997 .

[9]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  Can instruction as such affect learning? The case of learner control , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[10]  Nicola J. Gibbons,et al.  The interactivity effect in multimedia learning , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Pseudoscience in Computer-Based Instruction: The Case of Learner Control Research. , 1993 .

[12]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent , 2003 .

[13]  Andrew D. Ho,et al.  Changing “Course” , 2014 .

[14]  William D. Milheim Perceived Attitudinal Effects of Various Types of Learner Control in an Interactive Video Lesson. , 1989 .

[15]  Tamara van Gog,et al.  Explaining the segmentation effect in learning from animations: The role of pausing and temporal cueing , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[16]  William Haseman,et al.  User attitude as a mediator of learning performance improvement in an interactive multimedia environment: an empirical investigation of the degree of interactivity and learning styles , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[17]  R. Mayer Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[18]  Béatrice S. Hasler,et al.  Learner Control, Cognitive Load and Instructional Animation , 2007 .

[19]  Peter E. Doolittle,et al.  Multimedia learning and individual differences: Mediating the effects of working memory capacity with segmentation , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[20]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[21]  Corwin Senko,et al.  Pursuing their own learning agenda: How mastery-oriented students jeopardize their class performance , 2008 .

[22]  Dale E. Berger,et al.  Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Instruction in Statistics , 2011 .

[23]  Azar Pakdaman Savoji,et al.  Cognitive consequences of segmentation and modality methods in learning from instructional animations , 2011 .

[24]  David Hicks,et al.  Fostering Analysis in Historical Inquiry Through Multimedia Embedded Scaffolding , 2008 .

[25]  Mehmet Firat,et al.  Use of visual metaphors for navigation in educational hypermedia: Effects on the navigational performance , 2010 .

[26]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  Understanding in-video dropouts and interaction peaks inonline lecture videos , 2014, L@S.

[27]  Chien-Hung Liu,et al.  Learning effectiveness in a Web-based virtual learning environment: a learner control perspective , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[28]  Gary R. Morrison,et al.  Uses and effects of learner control of context and instructional support in computer-based instruction , 1989 .

[29]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Limitations of Student Control: Do Students Know When They Need Help? , 2000, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[30]  R. Azevedo,et al.  The Role of Self-Regulated Learning in Fostering Students' Conceptual Understanding of Complex Systems with Hypermedia , 2004 .

[31]  Huib K. Tabbers,et al.  Learner control in animated multimedia instructions , 2010 .

[32]  Philip J. Guo,et al.  How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos , 2014, L@S.

[33]  Steven M. Crooks,et al.  Does segmenting principle counteract modality principle in instructional animation? , 2014, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[34]  E. R. Steinberg Cognition and learner control: a literature review, 1977–1988 , 1989 .

[35]  B. Rittle-Johnson,et al.  Promoting transfer: effects of self-explanation and direct instruction. , 2006, Child development.

[36]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .