A longitudinal study of small group interaction in social virtual reality

Now that high-end consumer phones can support immersive virtual reality, we ask whether social virtual reality is a promising medium for supporting distributed groups of users. We undertook an exploratory in-the-wild study using Samsung Gear VR headsets to see how existing social groups that had become geographically dispersed could use VR for collaborative activities. The study showed a strong propensity for users to feel present and engaged with group members. Users were able to bring group behaviors into the virtual world. To overcome some technical limitations, they had to create novel forms of interaction. Overall, the study found that users experience a range of emotional states in VR that are broadly similar to those that they would experience face-to-face in the same groups. The study highlights the transferability of existing social group dynamics in VR interactions but suggests that more work would need to be done on avatar representations to support some intimate conversations.

[1]  Steve Benford,et al.  User embodiment in collaborative virtual environments , 1995, CHI '95.

[2]  Anthony Steed,et al.  The impact of a self-avatar on cognitive load in immersive virtual reality , 2016, 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[3]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Talk to the Virtual Hands: Self-Animated Avatars Improve Communication in Head-Mounted Display Virtual Environments , 2011, PloS one.

[4]  Mariano Alcañiz Raya,et al.  Affective Interactions Using Virtual Reality: The Link between Presence and Emotions , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[5]  Mel Slater,et al.  Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Musings on Telepresence and Virtual Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[7]  K. Scherer What are emotions? And how can they be measured? , 2005 .

[8]  Ilona Heldal,et al.  Strangers and friends in caves: an exploratory study of collaboration in networked IPT systems for extended periods of time , 2003, I3D '03.

[9]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Ideal Elf: Identity Exploration in World of Warcraft , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[10]  Mitsuru Ishizuka,et al.  THE EMPATHIC COMPANION: A CHARACTER-BASED INTERFACE THAT ADDRESSES USERS' AFFECTIVE STATES , 2005, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[11]  Victoria McArthur The UX of Avatar Customization , 2017, CHI.

[12]  Holtjona Galanxhi-Janaqi,et al.  Deception in cyberspace: A comparison of text-only vs. avatar-supported medium , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  Claire Petitmengin,et al.  Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness , 2006 .

[14]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  From presence to consciousness through virtual reality , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Laura K. Guerrero,et al.  Nonverbal Communication in Close Relationships , 2005 .

[16]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  The Unbearable Likeness of Being Digital: The Persistence of Nonverbal Social Norms in Online Virtual Environments , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[17]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Toward a More Robust Theory and Measure of Social Presence: Review and Suggested Criteria , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[18]  M. Argyle Bodily communication, 2nd ed. , 1988 .

[19]  Ernst Prelinger,et al.  Extension and Structure of the Self , 1959 .

[20]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[21]  Melissa S. Cook,et al.  Your Second Selves , 2010, Games Cult..

[22]  Anne M. Cronin Between friends: Making emotions intersubjectively , 2014 .

[23]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal Expectancies and the Evaluative Consequences of Violations , 1990 .

[24]  Marc Fabri,et al.  The Emotional Avatar: Non-verbal Communication Between Inhabitants of Collaborative Virtual Environments , 1999, Gesture Workshop.

[25]  Cade McCall,et al.  What Can Virtual Reality Teach Us About Prosocial Tendencies in Real and Virtual Environments? , 2008 .

[26]  Ming-Hui Wen,et al.  Body and mind: a study of avatar personalization in three virtual worlds , 2009, CHI.

[27]  Melissa S. Cook,et al.  ‘‘Blacks Deserve Bodies Too!’’: Design and Discussion About Diversity and Race in a Tween Virtual World , 2010 .

[28]  Ulrike Schultze,et al.  The Avatar-Self Relationship: Enacting Presence in Second Life , 2009, ICIS.

[29]  Mel Slater,et al.  Spatial Social Behavior in Second Life , 2007, IVA.

[30]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[31]  Ewald Moser,et al.  Amygdala activation at 3T in response to human and avatar facial expressions of emotions , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[33]  Oliver Otto,et al.  A review on effective closely-coupled collaboration using immersive CVE's , 2006, VRCIA '06.

[34]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Towards a Digital Body: The Virtual Arm Illusion , 2008, Frontiers in human neuroscience.

[35]  J. Russell,et al.  Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: dissecting the elephant. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  Sally Hong,et al.  The Social Life of Avatars: Presence and Interaction in Shared Virtual Environments , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..