From ‘Ivory Tower Traditionalists’ to ‘Entrepreneurial Scientists’? Academic Scientists in Fuzzy University-Industry Boundaries

Growing intensity of university-industry ties has generated an intense debate about the changing norms and practices of academic scientific work. This study challenges the protagonists' views on the emergence of a dominant market ethos in academic science and growing influence of the 'new school' entrepreneurial scientists. It argues that academic scientists are active agents seeking to shape the relationships between science and business, and shows continued diversity in their work orientations. Drawing on neo-institutional theory and the notion of 'boundary work', the study examines how scientists seek to protect and negotiate their positions, and also make sense of their professional role identities. It identifies four different orientations: the 'traditional' and 'entrepreneurial', with two hybrid types in between. The hybrids are the dominant category and are particularly adept at exploiting the ambiguities of 'boundary work' between academia and industry. The study is based on 36 interviews and a survey sample of 734 academic scientists from five UK research universities.

[1]  M. Henkel.  Can academic autonomy survive in the knowledge society? A perspective from Britain , 2007 .

[2]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[3]  C. Waterton.  Scientists' conceptions of the boundaries between their own research and policy , 2005 .

[4]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory , 1996 .

[5]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution , 1997 .

[6]  Eliot Freidson,et al.  Professionalism Reborn: Theory, Prophecy and Policy , 1994 .

[7]  N. Mouzelis.  Restructuring Structuration Theory , 1989 .

[8]  Glen E. Kreiner,et al.  On the edge of identity: Boundary dynamics at the interface of individual and organizational identities , 2006 .

[9]  Maurice Kogan,et al.  Higher Education Communities and Academic Identity , 2000 .

[10]  John Beck,et al.  The assault on the professions and the restructuring of academic and professional identities: a Bernsteinian analysis , 2005 .

[11]  Edward P. St. John,et al.  Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education , 2005 .

[12]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm , 2000 .

[13]  M. Lamont,et al.  The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences , 2002 .

[14]  H. Ibarra.  Provisional Selves: Experimenting with Image and Identity in Professional Adaptation , 1999 .

[15]  Sheila Slaughter,et al.  Academic capitalism and the new economy : markets, state, and higher education , 2009 .

[16]  H. Markus,et al.  Stability and malleability of the self-concept. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[18]  N. Toren,et al.  Scientists' Orientation Toward their Work: The Relative Effect of Socialization Versus Situation , 1982 .

[19]  Juha Tuunainen.  Contesting a Hybrid Firm at a Traditional University , 2005 .

[20]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  Labor Mobility from Academe to Commerce , 1997, Journal of Labor Economics.

[21]  M. Mallon,et al.  Constructing Scientific Careers: Change, Continuity and Context , 2006 .

[22]  Jeannette A. Colyvas,et al.  Roads to Institutionalization , 2006 .

[23]  Laurel Smith‐Doerr.  Institutionalizing the Network Form: How Life Scientists Legitimate Work in the Biotechnology Industry , 2005 .

[24]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[25]  J. Enders,et al.  Crisis? What crisis? The academic professions in the 'knowledge' society , 1999 .

[26]  C. Oliver.  STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[27]  Jane Calvert,et al.  What’s Special about Basic Research? , 2006 .

[28]  Luc Boltanski,et al.  The Sociology of Critical Capacity , 1999 .

[29]  Gerard George,et al.  Academics or Entrepreneurs? Entrepreneurial Identity and Invention Disclosure Behavior of University Scientists , 2005 .

[30]  J P Bunker,et al.  Professionalism Reborn: Theory, Prophecy, and Policy , 1994 .

[31]  P. Galison.  Refections on Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics , 1999, Perspectives on Science.

[32]  M. Mulkay.  Part One Sociology of Science in the West , 1980 .

[33]  Larry L. Leslie,et al.  Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University , 1997 .

[34]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  When Do Scientists Become Entrepreneurs? The Social Structural Antecedents of Commercial Activity in the Academic Life Sciences1 , 2006, American Journal of Sociology.

[35]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Fools Rush in? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation , 1994 .

[36]  Giuseppe Delmestri.  Streams of inconsistent institutional influences: Middle managers as carriers of multiple identities , 2006 .

[37]  R. Merton.  Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. , 1957 .

[38]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Careers and contradictions: Faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences , 2001 .

[39]  Katarzyna Kosmala,et al.  The ambivalence of professional identity: On cynicism and jouissance in audit firms , 2006 .

[40]  Robert K. Merton,et al.  Sociological ambivalence and other essays , 1976 .

[41]  Shahid Yusuf,et al.  Introduction to special section on university–industry linkages: The significance of tacit knowledge and the role of intermediaries , 2008 .

[42]  M. Mulkay.  Norms and ideology in science , 1976 .

[43]  M. Pratt,et al.  Classifying Managerial Responses to Multiple Organizational Identities , 2000 .

[44]  I. Mitroff.  Norms and Counter-Norms in a Select Group of the Apollo Moon Scientists: A Case Study of the Ambivalence of Scientists , 1974 .

[45]  C. McGourty.  Crisis ... what crisis? , 1989, Nature.

[46]  R. Badham,et al.  Cultures of ambiguity , 2005 .

[47]  Eva Lövbrand.  Pure science or policy involvement? Ambiguous boundary-work for Swedish carbon cycle science , 2007 .

[48]  L. Glenna,et al.  Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university-industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism , 2008 .

[49]  Martin Kenney,et al.  The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: a comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford , 2004 .

[50]  Paul Trowler,et al.  Captured by the Discourse? The Socially Constitutive Power of New Higher Education Discourse in the UK , 2001 .

[51]  Edward J. Hackett,et al.  Science as a Vocation in the 1990s: The Changing Organizational Culture of Academic Science. , 1990 .

[52]  Jeannette A. Colyvas,et al.  Roads to Institutionalization: The Remaking of Boundaries between Public and Private Science , 2006 .

[53]  Edward J. Hackett,et al.  Essential Tensions , 2005 .

[54]  Daniel Lee Kleinman,et al.  Contradiction, convergence and the knowledge economy: the confluence of academic and commercial biotechnology , 2007 .

[55]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  All in a Day'S Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions , 2000 .

[56]  Jane Bates,et al.  Fools rush in. , 2010, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[57]  S. Piderit.  Rethinking Resistance and Recognizing Ambivalence: A Multidimensional View of Attitudes Toward an Organizational Change , 2000 .

[58]  Sheila Slaughter,et al.  Academic capitalism and the new economy , 1997 .

[59]  H. Markus,et al.  Stability and malleability of the self-concept. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[60]  L. Vaccarezza.  The new production of knowledge. The dinamics of science and research in contemporary societies, Michael Gibbons, Camille Limoges, Hega Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott y Martin Trow, Londres, SAGE Publications, 1994, 179 páginas. , 1995 .

[61]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture and Cognition , 2002 .

[62]  T. Gieryn.  Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line , 1999 .

[63]  S. Box,et al.  Scientific identity, occupational selection, and role strain. , 1966, The British journal of sociology.

[64]  B. Clark.  Creating entrepreneurial universities , 1998 .

[65]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND THE ACADEMIC DEPARTMENT: WHO PARTICIPATES AND WHY? , 2003 .

[66]  M. Henkel.  Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment , 2005 .

[67]  Mike Wright,et al.  The rise of entrepreneurial activity at universities: organizational and societal implications , 2007 .

[68]  T. Gieryn.  Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional , 1983 .

[69]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? , 2007 .