Precision medicine and oncology: an overview of the opportunities presented by next-generation sequencing and big data and the challenges posed to conventional drug development and regulatory approval pathways.

Recent studies have begun to describe the vast extent of interand intra-tumor genomic diversity and the ability of the tumor genome to evolve over time and in response to selective pressures exerted by therapy, Gerlinger et al [1], Greaves and Maley [2]. Techniques allowing the systematic evaluation of the tumor genome, particularly Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), now have performance characteristics and costs which allow them to be integrated into routine clinical care and drug development, Frampton et al [3]. It is therefore pertinent to reevaluate the drug development and approval process of oncology therapies in light of these developments. Although it is too early to predict the extent to which NGS will transform oncology, it will likely become an important tool in routine diagnostics and, when combined with the use of treatment/matching algorithms based on the clinical relevance of mutational profiles, will have a beneficial effect on patient outcomes. Along with advances in immunotherapy, NGS, as a basis of selecting targeted therapies for cancer patients, should be incorporated into strategic planning for the future of oncology drug development. In the future, integrative systems biology approaches encompassing epigenomics, pathway analysis, and insights derived from the tumor microenvironment, in addition to genomics, are expected to lead to improved decision making. The use of NGS to elucidate the impact of somatic genomic alterations on treatment outcomes is an important first step, even if current attempts 1 Algorithms in this context refer to either simple decision rules, such as those embodied in clinical guidelines or more complex decision rules, which require the use of computer supported decision support systems. at T uane U niersity M eical L irary on A ril 7, 2016 http://annofordjournals.org/ D ow nladed from

[1]  F. Nicolantonio,et al.  Liquid biopsy: monitoring cancer-genetics in the blood , 2013, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[2]  E. Mardis,et al.  Prioritizing targets for precision cancer medicine. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[3]  Ash A. Alizadeh,et al.  Toward understanding and exploiting tumor heterogeneity , 2015, Nature Medicine.

[4]  R. Arceci Intratumor Heterogeneity and Branched Evolution Revealed by Multiregion Sequencing , 2012 .

[5]  K. Dhingra Oncology 2020: a drug development and approval paradigm. , 2015, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[6]  Ton N Schumacher,et al.  Biomarkers in cancer immunotherapy. , 2015, Cancer cell.

[7]  Carlo C. Maley,et al.  Clonal evolution in cancer , 2012, Nature.

[8]  Thomas Bachelot,et al.  Comparative genomic hybridisation array and DNA sequencing to direct treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a multicentre, prospective trial (SAFIR01/UNICANCER). , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[9]  Nicolai J. Birkbak,et al.  Clonal status of actionable driver events and the timing of mutational processes in cancer evolution , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[10]  Alex M. Fichtenholtz,et al.  Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  F. Hirsch,et al.  Innovative Clinical Trials: The LUNG‐MAP Study , 2015, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[12]  Ulrich Keilholz,et al.  The combinatorial complexity of cancer precision medicine , 2014, Oncoscience.

[13]  C. Huttenhower,et al.  Passing Messages between Biological Networks to Refine Predicted Interactions , 2013, PloS one.